Asp.net IIS6 - application pool recycle
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm running an ASP.NET website on Windows 2003 IIS 6.0
Every 24-28 hours I'm getting the following error:
When the error occurrs all users are disconnected from the website.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: W3SVC
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1013
Date: 02/02/2010
Time: 19:29:38
User: N/A
A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during
shut down. The process id was '1660'.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any idea what does the error means?
Is this related to application pool recycle?
If so, is it a "must" to recycle the IIS app pool?
asp.net iis-6 windows-server-2003
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm running an ASP.NET website on Windows 2003 IIS 6.0
Every 24-28 hours I'm getting the following error:
When the error occurrs all users are disconnected from the website.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: W3SVC
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1013
Date: 02/02/2010
Time: 19:29:38
User: N/A
A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during
shut down. The process id was '1660'.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any idea what does the error means?
Is this related to application pool recycle?
If so, is it a "must" to recycle the IIS app pool?
asp.net iis-6 windows-server-2003
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm running an ASP.NET website on Windows 2003 IIS 6.0
Every 24-28 hours I'm getting the following error:
When the error occurrs all users are disconnected from the website.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: W3SVC
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1013
Date: 02/02/2010
Time: 19:29:38
User: N/A
A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during
shut down. The process id was '1660'.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any idea what does the error means?
Is this related to application pool recycle?
If so, is it a "must" to recycle the IIS app pool?
asp.net iis-6 windows-server-2003
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
I'm running an ASP.NET website on Windows 2003 IIS 6.0
Every 24-28 hours I'm getting the following error:
When the error occurrs all users are disconnected from the website.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: W3SVC
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1013
Date: 02/02/2010
Time: 19:29:38
User: N/A
A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during
shut down. The process id was '1660'.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Any idea what does the error means?
Is this related to application pool recycle?
If so, is it a "must" to recycle the IIS app pool?
asp.net iis-6 windows-server-2003
asp.net iis-6 windows-server-2003
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
edited Dec 14 '11 at 11:48
SteveC
6,3711869121
6,3711869121
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
asked Feb 2 '10 at 18:22
RuSh
75541638
75541638
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16
add a comment |
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yep this is IIS running a clean up, and recycling the app pool. you can change how this works by changing the setting on the applicationn pool..
IIS 6 Configuring Worker Processes for Recycling
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can also be caused by deadlocks on the threadpool for your application. You may need to adjust the worker threads in your machine.config or alter that recycling settings adjust how often/when the recycling occurs based on processes or virtual memory.
Contention, poor performance, and deadlocks when you make Web service requests from ASP.NET applications
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yep this is IIS running a clean up, and recycling the app pool. you can change how this works by changing the setting on the applicationn pool..
IIS 6 Configuring Worker Processes for Recycling
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Yep this is IIS running a clean up, and recycling the app pool. you can change how this works by changing the setting on the applicationn pool..
IIS 6 Configuring Worker Processes for Recycling
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Yep this is IIS running a clean up, and recycling the app pool. you can change how this works by changing the setting on the applicationn pool..
IIS 6 Configuring Worker Processes for Recycling
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
Yep this is IIS running a clean up, and recycling the app pool. you can change how this works by changing the setting on the applicationn pool..
IIS 6 Configuring Worker Processes for Recycling
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:45
TheAlbear
3,72274176
3,72274176
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can also be caused by deadlocks on the threadpool for your application. You may need to adjust the worker threads in your machine.config or alter that recycling settings adjust how often/when the recycling occurs based on processes or virtual memory.
Contention, poor performance, and deadlocks when you make Web service requests from ASP.NET applications
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can also be caused by deadlocks on the threadpool for your application. You may need to adjust the worker threads in your machine.config or alter that recycling settings adjust how often/when the recycling occurs based on processes or virtual memory.
Contention, poor performance, and deadlocks when you make Web service requests from ASP.NET applications
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This can also be caused by deadlocks on the threadpool for your application. You may need to adjust the worker threads in your machine.config or alter that recycling settings adjust how often/when the recycling occurs based on processes or virtual memory.
Contention, poor performance, and deadlocks when you make Web service requests from ASP.NET applications
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
This can also be caused by deadlocks on the threadpool for your application. You may need to adjust the worker threads in your machine.config or alter that recycling settings adjust how often/when the recycling occurs based on processes or virtual memory.
Contention, poor performance, and deadlocks when you make Web service requests from ASP.NET applications
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
answered Feb 9 '10 at 12:53
Joel Etherton
33.2k87094
33.2k87094
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
add a comment |
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
Unless further information is collected, I personally don't think it is a good idea to follow that KB article. Such warnings in event logs are generally harmless (if no other errors are observed at the same time).
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f2186541%2fasp-net-iis6-application-pool-recycle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Possible duplication: stackoverflow.com/questions/411918/iis-apppool-error-1013-w3svc
– Zhaph - Ben Duguid
Feb 2 '10 at 22:57
not quite the same as the other is a forced recycle by IIS, this is a normal recycle.
– TheAlbear
Feb 9 '10 at 12:46
Forced or not, application pool recycle is there, and you should then avoid in-process session mode (which means the new worker process does not keep previous sessions). That change of design can guarantee you won't get "all users are disconnected from the website". The latter is an issue, while the recycle is innocent.
– Lex Li
Dec 17 '14 at 8:11
Did one of the answers answer your question?
– John Saunders
Jun 23 '15 at 1:16