Unit (ring theory)





In mathematics, an invertible element or a unit in a (unital) ring R is any element u that has an inverse element in the multiplicative monoid of R, i.e. an element v such that



uv = vu = 1R, where 1R is the multiplicative identity.[1][2]

The set of units of any ring is closed under multiplication (the product of two units is again a unit), and forms a group for this operation. It never contains the element 0 (except in the case of the zero ring), and is therefore not closed under addition; its complement however might be a group under addition, which happens if and only if the ring is a local ring.


The term unit is also used to refer to the identity element 1R of the ring, in expressions like ring with a unit or unit ring, and also e.g. 'unit' matrix. For this reason, some authors call 1R "unity" or "identity", and say that R is a "ring with unity" or a "ring with identity" rather than a "ring with a unit".


The multiplicative identity 1R and its opposite −1R are always units. Hence, pairs of additive inverse elements[3]x and x are always associated.




Contents






  • 1 Examples


    • 1.1 Integers


    • 1.2 Polynomials and power series


    • 1.3 Matrix rings


    • 1.4 In general




  • 2 Group of units


  • 3 Associatedness


  • 4 See also


  • 5 References





Examples


In any ring, 1 is a unit. More generally, any root of unity in a ring R is a unit: if rn = 1, then rn − 1 is a multiplicative inverse of r.
On the other hand, 0 is never a unit (except in the zero ring). A ring R is a field (possibly non-commutative, also known as a skew field or division ring) if and only if U(R) = R ∖ {0}, where U(R) is the group of units of R. For example, the units of the real numbers R are R ∖ {0}.
Thus, for any ring R, there is an inclusion


roots of unity ⊂U(R)⊂R∖{0}.{displaystyle {text{roots of unity }}subset U(R)subset Rbackslash {0}.}{displaystyle {text{roots of unity }}subset U(R)subset Rbackslash {0}.}


Integers


In the ring of integers Z, the only units are +1 and −1.


Rings of integers R=OF{displaystyle R={mathfrak {O}}_{F}}{displaystyle R={mathfrak {O}}_{F}} in a number field F have, in general, more units. For example,


(5 + 2)(5 − 2) = 1

in the ring Z[1 + 5/2], and in fact the unit group of this ring is infinite.


In fact, Dirichlet's unit theorem describes the structure of U(R) precisely: it is isomorphic to a group of the form


Zn⊕μR{displaystyle mathbf {Z} ^{n}oplus mu _{R}}{displaystyle mathbf {Z} ^{n}oplus mu _{R}}

where μR{displaystyle mu _{R}}mu_R is the (finite, cyclic) group of roots of unity in R and n, the rank of the unit group is


n=r1+r2−1,{displaystyle n=r_{1}+r_{2}-1,}{displaystyle n=r_{1}+r_{2}-1,}

where r1,r2{displaystyle r_{1},r_{2}}{displaystyle r_{1},r_{2}} are the numbers of real embeddings and the number of pairs of complex embeddings of F, respectively.


This recovers the above example: the unit group of (the ring of integers of) a real quadratic field is infinite of rank 1, since r1=2,r2=0{displaystyle r_{1}=2,r_{2}=0}{displaystyle r_{1}=2,r_{2}=0}.


In the ring Z/nZ of integers modulo n, the units are the congruence classes (mod n) represented by integers coprime to n. They constitute the multiplicative group of integers modulo n.



Polynomials and power series


For a commutative ring R, the units of the polynomial ring R[x] are precisely those polynomials


p(x)=a0+a1x+…anxn{displaystyle p(x)=a_{0}+a_{1}x+dots a_{n}x^{n}}{displaystyle p(x)=a_{0}+a_{1}x+dots a_{n}x^{n}}

such that a0{displaystyle a_{0}}a_{0} is a unit in R, and the remaining coefficients a1,…,an{displaystyle a_{1},dots ,a_{n}}a_{1},dots ,a_{n} are nilpotent elements, i.e., satisfy aiN=0{displaystyle a_{i}^{N}=0}{displaystyle a_{i}^{N}=0} for some N.[4] In particular, if R is a domain (has no zero divisors), then the units of R[x] agree with the ones of R.
The units of the power series ring R[[x]]{displaystyle R[[x]]}{displaystyle R[[x]]} are precisely those power series


p(x)=∑i=0∞aixi{displaystyle p(x)=sum _{i=0}^{infty }a_{i}x^{i}}{displaystyle p(x)=sum _{i=0}^{infty }a_{i}x^{i}}

such that a0{displaystyle a_{0}}a_{0} is a unit in R.[5]



Matrix rings


The unit group of the ring Mn(R) of n × n matrices over a commutative ring R (for example, a field) is the group GLn(R) of invertible matrices.


An element of the matrix ring Mn⁡(R){displaystyle operatorname {M} _{n}(R)}{displaystyle operatorname {M} _{n}(R)} is invertible if and only if the determinant of the element is invertible in R, with the inverse explicitly given by Cramer's rule.



In general


Let R{displaystyle R}R be a ring. For any x,y{displaystyle x,y}x,y in R{displaystyle R}R, if 1−xy{displaystyle 1-xy}{displaystyle 1-xy} is invertible, then 1−yx{displaystyle 1-yx}{displaystyle 1-yx} is invertible with the inverse 1+y(1−xy)−1x{displaystyle 1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x}{displaystyle 1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x}.[6] The formula for the inverse can be found as follows: thinking formally, suppose 1−yx{displaystyle 1-yx}{displaystyle 1-yx} is invertible and that the inverse is given by a geometric series: (1−yx)−1=∑0∞(yx)n{displaystyle (1-yx)^{-1}=sum _{0}^{infty }(yx)^{n}}{displaystyle (1-yx)^{-1}=sum _{0}^{infty }(yx)^{n}}. Then, manipulating it formally,


(1−yx)−1=1+y(∑0∞(xy)n)x=1+y(1−xy)−1x.{displaystyle (1-yx)^{-1}=1+yleft(sum _{0}^{infty }(xy)^{n}right)x=1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x.}{displaystyle (1-yx)^{-1}=1+yleft(sum _{0}^{infty }(xy)^{n}right)x=1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x.}

See also Hua's identity for a similar type of results.



Group of units


The units of a ring R form a group U(R) under multiplication, the group of units of R. Other common notations for U(R) are R, R×, and E(R) (from the German term Einheit).


This defines a functor U from the category of rings to the category of groups: every ring homomorphism f : RS induces a group homomorphism U(f) : U(R) → U(S), since f maps units to units. This functor has a left adjoint which is the integral group ring construction.



Associatedness



In a commutative unital ring R, the group of units U(R) acts on R via multiplication. The orbits of this action are called sets of associates; in other words, there is an equivalence relation ∼ on R called associatedness such that


rs

means that there is a unit u with r = us.


In an integral domain the cardinality of an equivalence class of associates is the same as that of U(R).



See also


  • S-units


References





  1. ^ Dummit, David S.; Foote, Richard M. (2004). Abstract Algebra (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-43334-9..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  2. ^ Lang, Serge (2002). Algebra. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer. ISBN 0-387-95385-X.


  3. ^ In a ring, the additive inverse of a non-zero element can equal the element itself.


  4. ^ Watkins (2007, Theorem 11.1)


  5. ^ Watkins (2007, Theorem 12.1)


  6. ^ Jacobson, § 2.2. Exercise 4.




  • Jacobson, Nathan (2009), Basic Algebra 1 (2nd ed.), Dover,
    ISBN 978-0-486-47189-1


  • Watkins, John J. (2007), Topics in commutative ring theory, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-12748-4, MR 2330411




Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Lugert, Oklahoma