Altering stored procedure from another procedure












0














I would like to know how to alter a stored procedure from another stored procedure. I have created one stored procedure called dbo.change, and in this procedure I would like to alter other stored procedure that needs to be altered.



But currently I use alter procedure and when the change procedure is compiling it fails at the alter. Is there a method of doing this?










share|improve this question




















  • 7




    why would you need to that?
    – Mitch Wheat
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:53






  • 1




    I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
    – Giannis Paraskevopoulos
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54










  • It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
    – jpw
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54












  • because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
    – user3086751
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:55










  • @user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
    – Paolo
    Sep 9 '14 at 13:32


















0














I would like to know how to alter a stored procedure from another stored procedure. I have created one stored procedure called dbo.change, and in this procedure I would like to alter other stored procedure that needs to be altered.



But currently I use alter procedure and when the change procedure is compiling it fails at the alter. Is there a method of doing this?










share|improve this question




















  • 7




    why would you need to that?
    – Mitch Wheat
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:53






  • 1




    I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
    – Giannis Paraskevopoulos
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54










  • It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
    – jpw
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54












  • because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
    – user3086751
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:55










  • @user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
    – Paolo
    Sep 9 '14 at 13:32
















0












0








0







I would like to know how to alter a stored procedure from another stored procedure. I have created one stored procedure called dbo.change, and in this procedure I would like to alter other stored procedure that needs to be altered.



But currently I use alter procedure and when the change procedure is compiling it fails at the alter. Is there a method of doing this?










share|improve this question















I would like to know how to alter a stored procedure from another stored procedure. I have created one stored procedure called dbo.change, and in this procedure I would like to alter other stored procedure that needs to be altered.



But currently I use alter procedure and when the change procedure is compiling it fails at the alter. Is there a method of doing this?







sql sql-server sql-server-2008 stored-procedures






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 9 '14 at 12:02









marc_s

569k12811001250




569k12811001250










asked Sep 9 '14 at 11:51









user3086751

147116




147116








  • 7




    why would you need to that?
    – Mitch Wheat
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:53






  • 1




    I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
    – Giannis Paraskevopoulos
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54










  • It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
    – jpw
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54












  • because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
    – user3086751
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:55










  • @user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
    – Paolo
    Sep 9 '14 at 13:32
















  • 7




    why would you need to that?
    – Mitch Wheat
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:53






  • 1




    I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
    – Giannis Paraskevopoulos
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54










  • It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
    – jpw
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:54












  • because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
    – user3086751
    Sep 9 '14 at 11:55










  • @user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
    – Paolo
    Sep 9 '14 at 13:32










7




7




why would you need to that?
– Mitch Wheat
Sep 9 '14 at 11:53




why would you need to that?
– Mitch Wheat
Sep 9 '14 at 11:53




1




1




I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
– Giannis Paraskevopoulos
Sep 9 '14 at 11:54




I do not know why you would want to do that, but you could use a dynamic sql.
– Giannis Paraskevopoulos
Sep 9 '14 at 11:54












It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
– jpw
Sep 9 '14 at 11:54






It might be possible using dynamic sql, but why would you want to do this? What is the real problem you are trying to solve?
– jpw
Sep 9 '14 at 11:54














because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
– user3086751
Sep 9 '14 at 11:55




because i need to make changes to a live database, and am testing it on a local one to see changes to the tables don't affect the data, and these procedure have local data-type declared need to change these so they match the new table schema
– user3086751
Sep 9 '14 at 11:55












@user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
– Paolo
Sep 9 '14 at 13:32






@user3086751 the real question is the one behind your 'because i need to make changes to a live database'. which changes you need to make? why they do have to be performed by a stored procedure? imho the solution you are trying to implement is a paved highway to major troubles: executing alter statements from stored procedures will produce naive behaviour almost impossible to trace & debug.
– Paolo
Sep 9 '14 at 13:32














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














You need to use dynamic SQL to alter a stored procedure from within another. For example:



ALTER PROC dbo.Change
AS
EXEC sp_executesql N'ALTER PROC dbo.SomeOtherProc AS ...';
GO





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f25743960%2faltering-stored-procedure-from-another-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    You need to use dynamic SQL to alter a stored procedure from within another. For example:



    ALTER PROC dbo.Change
    AS
    EXEC sp_executesql N'ALTER PROC dbo.SomeOtherProc AS ...';
    GO





    share|improve this answer


























      4














      You need to use dynamic SQL to alter a stored procedure from within another. For example:



      ALTER PROC dbo.Change
      AS
      EXEC sp_executesql N'ALTER PROC dbo.SomeOtherProc AS ...';
      GO





      share|improve this answer
























        4












        4








        4






        You need to use dynamic SQL to alter a stored procedure from within another. For example:



        ALTER PROC dbo.Change
        AS
        EXEC sp_executesql N'ALTER PROC dbo.SomeOtherProc AS ...';
        GO





        share|improve this answer












        You need to use dynamic SQL to alter a stored procedure from within another. For example:



        ALTER PROC dbo.Change
        AS
        EXEC sp_executesql N'ALTER PROC dbo.SomeOtherProc AS ...';
        GO






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 9 '14 at 11:56









        Dan Guzman

        22.8k31540




        22.8k31540






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f25743960%2faltering-stored-procedure-from-another-procedure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Florida Star v. B. J. F.

            Danny Elfman

            Lugert, Oklahoma