Floating-point precision problems
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Why do these two formulae produce different results?
= (0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1)
produces -2.775E-17
while
= 0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1
produces exactly 0.
The only difference is in the brackets. Does Excel try to do clever things with floating-point numbers that it thinks should be a certain value instead of another value in order to hide the usual problems of binary floating-point and make it look as though it's using decimal arithmetic? Is this documented?
excel floating-point precision
add a comment |
Using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Why do these two formulae produce different results?
= (0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1)
produces -2.775E-17
while
= 0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1
produces exactly 0.
The only difference is in the brackets. Does Excel try to do clever things with floating-point numbers that it thinks should be a certain value instead of another value in order to hide the usual problems of binary floating-point and make it look as though it's using decimal arithmetic? Is this documented?
excel floating-point precision
1
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
2
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
Using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Why do these two formulae produce different results?
= (0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1)
produces -2.775E-17
while
= 0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1
produces exactly 0.
The only difference is in the brackets. Does Excel try to do clever things with floating-point numbers that it thinks should be a certain value instead of another value in order to hide the usual problems of binary floating-point and make it look as though it's using decimal arithmetic? Is this documented?
excel floating-point precision
Using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Why do these two formulae produce different results?
= (0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1)
produces -2.775E-17
while
= 0.5 - 0.4 - 0.1
produces exactly 0.
The only difference is in the brackets. Does Excel try to do clever things with floating-point numbers that it thinks should be a certain value instead of another value in order to hide the usual problems of binary floating-point and make it look as though it's using decimal arithmetic? Is this documented?
excel floating-point precision
excel floating-point precision
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:48
DodgyCodeExceptionDodgyCodeException
3,6571426
3,6571426
1
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
2
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
1
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
2
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37
1
1
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
2
2
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337274%2ffloating-point-precision-problems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337274%2ffloating-point-precision-problems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Consider reading this: link.
– Pspl
Nov 16 '18 at 11:54
2
Related: stackoverflow.com/q/36452194/270986, stackoverflow.com/q/40293983/270986. The answers to your last two questions appear to be (1) Yes, and (2) Not really, no.
– Mark Dickinson
Nov 16 '18 at 16:48
@MarkDickinson thanks. I think those two linked posts together fully answer my question in a roundabout way.
– DodgyCodeException
Nov 19 '18 at 9:37