Ndtyjky

This article is part of a series on
Conservatism in the United States
Schools Compassionate Fiscal Fusion Libertarian Movement Neo Paleo Social Traditional
Principles Classical liberalism Family values Free market Free Trade Judeo-Christian values Limited government Moral absolutism Natural law Republicanism Rule of law Tradition
History Overview Bourbon Democrat Conservative coalition Conservative Democrat Conservative Manifesto Loyalists (colonial) Old Right New Right Rockefeller Republican Southern Agrarians Modern timeline
People Elliott Abrams Roger Ailes Samuel Alito Dick Armey Lee Atwater Irving Babbitt Steve Bannon Glenn Beck Morton Blackwell Robert Bork John R. Bolton Brent Bozell Andrew Breitbart Arthur C. Brooks Pat Buchanan William F. Buckley Jr. James Burnham George H. W. Bush George W. Bush Jeb Bush Ben Nighthorse Campbell Tucker Carlson Ben Carson Whittaker Chambers Dick Cheney Grover Cleveland Tom Coburn Roy Cohn Bob Corker Tom Cotton Calvin Coolidge Ann Coulter Steven Crowder Ted Cruz Charles Curtis Jim DeMint John Derbyshire Everett Dirksen Lou Dobbs James Dobson Terry Dolan Bob Dole Dinesh D'Souza Larry Elder Dwight Eisenhower Erick Erickson Jerry Falwell Jerry Falwell Jr. Edwin Feulner Thomas Fleming Steve Forbes Gerald Ford Sam Francis Milton Friedman Foster Friess David Frum Michael Gerson Newt Gingrich Paul Gottfried Jonah Goldberg Barry Goldwater Sebastian Gorka Neil Gorsuch Billy Graham Franklin Graham Sean Hannity Hugh Hewitt Hans-Hermann Hoppe David Horowitz Jesse Helms Amy Holmes Laura Ingraham Alex Jones Jack Kemp Alan Keyes Alveda King Russell Kirk Jeane Kirkpatrick Henry Kissinger Larry Klayman William F. Knowland Charles Koch David Koch Charles Krauthammer Irving Kristol William Kristol Art Laffer Wayne LaPierre Mike Lee Mark Levin Rush Limbaugh Henry Cabot Lodge Dana Loesch Rich Lowry Clare Boothe Luce Michelle Malkin Noah M. Mason Joe McCarthy Mitch McConnell Green McCurtain Larry McDonald Mark Meadows Edwin Meese Rebekah Mercer Robert Mercer Frank Meyer Stephen Miller Markwayne Mullin Richard Nixon Peggy Noonan Grover Norquist Oliver North Robert Novak James O'Keefe Bill O'Reilly Candace Owens Sarah Palin Rand Paul Ron Paul Mike Pence Tony Perkins Howard Phillips Daniel Pipes John Podhoretz Norman Podhoretz Dennis Prager Ronald Reagan Ralph Reed Pat Robertson Phil Robertson Karl Rove Marco Rubio Donald Rumsfeld Richard Russell Jr. Steve Sailer Ben Sasse Michael Savage Antonin Scalia Phyllis Schlafly Ben Shapiro Howard W. Smith Joseph Sobran Thomas Sowell Leo Strauss Roger Stone Robert Taft William Howard Taft Clarence Thomas Strom Thurmond Donald Trump Emmett Tyrrell Arthur Vandenberg Richard Viguerie Booker T. Washington Robert Welch Paul Weyrich Paul Wolfowitz George Will Walter E. Williams
Parties America First Party America's Party American Party American Independent Party Christian Liberty Party Conservative Party of New York State Constitution Party Libertarian Party Native American Party Prohibition Party Reform Party Republican Party (GOP) States' Rights Democratic Party
Think tanks Acton Institute Alexis de Tocqueville Institution American Enterprise Institute Center for Immigration Studies Center for Security Policy Center for the National Interest Charles Koch Institute Claremont Institute Competitive Enterprise Institute David Horowitz Freedom Center Discovery Institute Ethics and Public Policy Center Family Research Institute Gatestone Institute Heartland Institute Heritage Foundation Hoover Institution Hudson Institute Intercollegiate Studies Institute Institute on the Constitution Manhattan Institute Mises Institute Pacific Research Institute Project for the New American Century Ripon Society R Street Institute Rockford Institute State Policy Network Tax Foundation
Other organizations ACT! for America Alliance Defending Freedom American Center for Law & Justice American Family Association American Liberty League Arlington Group Chalcedon Foundation Christian Coalition of America Christian Voice Club for Growth Concerned Women for America ConservAmerica Conservative Caucus Council of Conservative Citizens Council for National Policy Eagle Forum Faith and Freedom Coalition Family Research Council Federalist Society Federation for American Immigration Reform Fellowship Foundation Focus on the Family Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Foundation for Moral Law Freedom Caucus Freedom Partners FreedomWorks Gun Owners of America Independent Women's Forum John Birch Society John M. Olin Foundation Judicial Watch Leadership Institute Liberty Lobby Log Cabin Republicans Media Research Center Moral Majority National Conservative Political Action Committee National Federation of Independent Business National Organization for Marriage National Rifle Association National Right to Life Committee National Taxpayers Union NumbersUSA Oath Keepers Philadelphia Society Regnery Publishing Republican Main Street Partnership Republican Study Committee Second Amendment Caucus Susan B. Anthony List Tea Party Patriots Turning Point USA Traditional Values Coalition United States Chamber of Commerce Young America's Foundation Young Americans for Liberty Youth for Western Civilization
Media American Affairs The American Conservative The American Spectator American Renaissance American Thinker Breitbart TheBlaze Campus Reform Chicago Tribune CBN City Journal Claremont Review of Books CNSNews.com Commentary Conservative Review Chronicles Daily Caller Daily Signal Daily Wire Dallas Morning News Drudge Report The Federalist First Things Fox Business Fox News FrontPage Magazine Front Porch Republic Gateway Pundit Hot Air Human Events Independent Journal Review InfoWars Jewish World Review Jihad Watch Las Vegas Review-Journal LifeSiteNews LifeZette Modern Age National Affairs The National Interest National Review The New American The New Criterion NewsBusters Newsmax New York Observer New York Post One America News Network PanAm Post Policy Review Power Line PragerU PJ Media Rare Real News Update RedState RSBN Sinclair Broadcast Group The Spotlight Taki's Magazine Townhall TruthRevolt Twitchy VDARE Wall Street Journal Washington Examiner Washington Free Beacon Washington Times Weekly Standard The Western Journal WorldNetDaily
Variants and movements Christian right Conservative Democrat Patriot movement Radical Right Tea Party movement Asian and Pacific Islander conservatism Black conservatism Green conservatism LGBT conservatism Women in conservatism
See also Bibliography American nationalism Libertarianism List
Conservatism portal
v t e

Fiscal conservatism (also economic conservatism or conservative economics) is a political-economic philosophy regarding fiscal policy and fiscal responsibility advocating low taxes, reduced government spending and minimal government debt.^[1]Free trade, deregulation of the economy, lower taxes, and privatization are the defining qualities of fiscal conservatism. Fiscal conservatism follows the same philosophical outlook of classical liberalism and economic liberalism.^[2] The term has its origins in the era of the New Deal during the 1930s as a result of the policies initiated by reform or modern liberals, when many classical liberals started calling themselves conservatives as they did not wish to be identified with what was passing for liberalism.^[3]

In the United States the term liberalism has become associated with the welfare state and expanded regulatory policies created as a result of the New Deal and its offshoots from the 1930s onwards.^[4] Fiscal conservatives form one of the three legs of the traditional conservative movement in the United States, together with social conservatism and national defense conservatism.^[5] Many Americans who are classical liberals also tend to identify as libertarian,^[6] holding more socially liberal views and advocating a non-interventionist foreign policy while supporting lower taxes and less government spending.^[5]

Overview

Principles

Fiscal conservatism is the economic philosophy of prudence in government spending and debt.^[7] Fiscal conservatives advocate the avoidance of deficit spending, the reduction of overall government spending and national debt, and ensuring balanced budgets. In other words, fiscal conservatives are against the government expanding beyond its means through debt, but will usually choose debt over tax increases.

Edmund Burke, in his Reflections on the Revolution in France, argued that a government does not have the right to run up large debts and then throw the burden on the taxpayer:

[I]t is to the property of the citizen, and not to the demands of the creditor of the state, that the first and original faith of civil society is pledged. The claim of the citizen is prior in time, paramount in title, superior in equity. The fortunes of individuals, whether possessed by acquisition or by descent or in virtue of a participation in the goods of some community, were no part of the creditor's security, expressed or implied ... [T]he public, whether represented by a monarch or by a senate, can pledge nothing but the public estate; and it can have no public estate except in what it derives from a just and proportioned imposition upon the citizens at large.

Factions or subgroups

Although all fiscal conservatives agree generally on a smaller and less expensive government there are disagreements over priorities.^[5] There are three main factions or subgroups each advocating for a particular emphasis.
Deficit hawks emphasize balancing government budgets and reducing the size of government debt, viewing government debt as economically damaging and morally dubious since it passes on obligations on to future generations who have played no part in present-day tax and spending decisions.^[5] Deficit hawks are willing to consider tax increases if the additional revenue is used to reduce debt rather than increase spending.^[5]

A second group put their main emphasis on tax cuts rather than spending cuts or debt reduction. Many embrace supply-side economics, arguing that as high taxes discourage economic activity and investment, tax cuts would result in economic growth leading in turn to higher government revenues.^[5] These additional government revenues, would in the long term reduce debt, they also argue for reducing taxes even if it were to lead to short term increases in the deficit.^[5] Some supply-siders have even advocated that the increases in revenue through tax cuts make drastic cuts in spending unnecessary.^[5] However, the Congressional Budget Office has consistently reported that income tax cuts increase deficits and debt and do not pay for themselves. For example, the CBO estimated that the Bush tax cuts added about $1.5 trillion to deficits and debt from 2002-2011^[8] and would have added nearly $3 trillion to deficits and debt over the 2010-2019 decade if fully extended at all income levels.^[9]

A third group makes little distinction between debt and taxes, this group emphasizes reduction in spending rather than tax policy or debt reduction.^[10] They argue that the true cost of government is the level of spending not how that spending is financed.^[5] Every dollar that the government spends is a dollar taken from American workers, regardless whether it is from debt or taxes. Taxes simply redistribute purchasing power, doing so in a particularly inefficient manner, reducing the incentives to produce or hire and borrowing simply forces businesses and investors to anticipate higher taxes later on.^[10]

History in the United States

Early to mid 20th century

Herbert Hoover addresses a large crowd in his 1932 campaign.

In the early 20th century fiscal conservatives were often at odds with progressives who desired economic reform.
During the 1920s, President Calvin Coolidge's pro-business economic policies were credited for the successful period of economic growth known as the "Roaring Twenties." His actions, however, may have been due more to a sense of federalism than fiscal conservatism: Robert Sobel notes, "As Governor of Massachusetts, Coolidge supported wages and hours legislation, opposed child labor, imposed economic controls during World War I, favored safety measures in factories, and even worker representation on corporate boards."^[11]

are often popularly contrasted with the New Deal deficit spending of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Republican Party opposition to Roosevelt's government spending was a unifying cause for a significant caucus of Republicans through even the presidencies of Truman and Eisenhower. Barry Goldwater was a famous champion of both the socially and fiscally conservative Republicans.

Reagan era

Reagan spent the most of any recent President, measured as annual average % GDP.^[12]

Fiscal conservatism was rhetorically promoted during the presidency of Ronald Reagan (1981–1989). During Reagan's tenure, the top personal income tax bracket dropped from 70% to 28%,^[13] while payroll taxes and the effective tax rates on the lower two income quintiles increased.^[14][15] Real GDP growth recovered strongly after the 1982 recession, growing at an annual rate of 3.4% for the rest of his time in office.^[16] Unemployment dropped after peaking at over 10.7% percent in 1982, and inflation decreased significantly.^[17] Federal tax receipts nearly doubled from $517 billion in 1980 to $1,032 billion in 1990. Employment grew at about the same rate as population.

According to a United States Department of the Treasury nonpartisan economic study, the major tax bills enacted under Reagan caused federal revenue to fall by an amount equal to roughly 1% of GDP.^[18] By the end of Reagan's second term, the national debt held by the public increased by almost 60%, and the total debt equalled $2.6 trillion. In fewer than eight years, the U.S. went from being the world's largest creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation.^[19]

Ross Perot

In the 1992 Presidential election, Ross Perot, a successful American businessman, ran as a third-party candidate. Despite significant campaign stumbles, and the uphill struggles involved in mounting a third-party candidacy, Perot received 18.9% of the popular vote (the largest percentage of any third-party candidate in modern history), largely on the basis of his central platform plank of limited-government, balanced-budget fiscal conservatism.

Clinton era

The Ominibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 increased the average federal tax rates for the top 1%, while lowering average tax rates for the middle class. President Obama also raised tax rates for higher income persons starting in 2013, through the partial expiration of the Bush tax cuts. The Clinton and Obama tax increases lowered deficits relative to CBO policy baselines without them.

While the mantle of fiscal conservatism is most commonly claimed by Republicans and libertarians, it is also claimed in some ways by many centrist or moderate Democrats who often refer to themselves as "New Democrats". Although not supportive of the wide range tax cut policies that were often enacted during the Reagan and Bush administrations,^[20][21] the New Democrat coalition's primary economic agenda differed from the traditional philosophy held by liberal Democrats and sided with the fiscal conservative belief that a balanced federal budget should take precedence over some spending programs.^[21] Former President Bill Clinton, who was a New Democrat and part of the somewhat fiscally conservative Third Way advocating Democratic Leadership Council, is a prime example of this as his administration along with the Democratic-majority congress of 1993 passed on a party-line vote the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 which cut government spending, created a 36% individual income tax bracket, raised the top tax bracket, which encompassed the top 1.2% earning taxpayers, from 31% to 39.6%, and created a 35% income tax rate for corporations.^[22] The 1993 Budget Act also cut taxes for fifteen million low-income families and 90% of small businesses. Additionally, during the Clinton years, the PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) system originally introduced with the passing of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (which required that all increases in direct spending or revenue decreases be offset by other spending decreases or revenue increases and was very popular with deficit hawks) had gone into effect, and was used regularly until the system's expiration in 2002.

In the 1994 midterm elections, Republicans ran on a platform that included fiscal responsibility drafted by then-Congressman Newt Gingrich called the Contract with America, which advocated such things as balancing the budget, providing the president with a line-item veto, and welfare reform. After the elections gave the Republicans a majority in the House of Representatives, newly minted Speaker of the House Gingrich pushed aggressively for reduced government spending, which created a confrontation with the White House that climaxed in the 1995–1996 government shutdown. After Clinton's re-election in 1996, they were able to cooperate and pass the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, which lowered the top capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20% and the 15% rate to 10%.

After this combination of tax hikes and spending reductions, the United States was able to create budget surpluses from fiscal years 1998-2001 (the first time since 1969), and the longest period of sustained economic growth in United States history.^[23][24][25]

Modern fiscal conservatism in the United States

Comparison of annual federal deficits (CBO 10-year forecast from prior to inauguration vs. the actual amount), during the Obama and G.W. Bush presidencies. Bush added far more to the debt relative to the CBO 2001 forecast than Obama added relative to the CBO 2009 forecast.

American businessman, politician, and former Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, considers himself a fiscal conservative and expressed his definition of the term at the 2007 British Conservative Party Conference:

"To me, fiscal conservatism means balancing budgets – not running deficits that the next generation can't afford. It means improving the efficiency of delivering services by finding innovative ways to do more with less. It means cutting taxes when possible and prudent to do so, raising them overall only when necessary to balance the budget, and only in combination with spending cuts. It means when you run a surplus, you save it; you don't squander it. And most importantly, being a fiscal conservative means preparing for the inevitable economic downturns – and by all indications, we've got one coming."^[26]

Rest of the world

As a result of the expansion of the welfare state and increased regulatory policies by the Roosevelt administration beginning in the 1930s, the term liberalism in the United States today has become associated with modern rather than classical liberalism.^[4] In Western Europe, however, the expanded welfare states created after the Second World War were created by socialist or social democratic parties such as the British Labour Party rather than liberal parties.^[4] As a result, many liberal parties in Western Europe tend to adhere to classical liberalism, the Free Democratic Party in Germany being one example.^[4] The Liberal Democrats in the UK have a classical and a social liberal wing of the party. In many countries liberalism or neoliberalism is used to describe what Americans call fiscal conservatism.^[4][27][2]

Fiscal conservatism in the UK was arguably most popular during the premiership of Margaret Thatcher, who, after a number of years of deficit spending under the previous Labour government, advocated spending cuts and selective tax increases to balance the budget. In 2010, as a result of the deterioration in the UK's public finances—according to fiscal conservatives caused by another spate of deficit spending under the previous Labour government, the late-2000s recession and by the European sovereign debt crisis—the Liberal Democrat-Conservative Coalition embarked on an austerity programme, featuring a combination of spending cuts and tax rises, in an attempt to halve the deficit and completely eliminate the structural deficit over the five-year parliament.^[28]

In Canada, the rise of the socialist Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) pushed the Liberal Party to create and expand the welfare state before and after World War II.^[4] Fiscal conservatism in Canada is generally referred to as Blue Toryism when it is present within the Conservative Party of Canada.^[29] In Alberta, fiscal conservatism is represented by the United Conservative Party.^[30] In Ontario, fiscal conservatism is represented by the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario.

See also

• Austerity


• Balance of payments


• Balance of trade


• Capitalism


• Classical liberalism


• Criticisms of welfare


• Economic freedom


• Economic liberalism


• Market economy


• Minarchism


• Right-wing politics

US-specific

• Concord Coalition


• Citizens Against Government Waste


• Republican Main Street Partnership

Notes

References

• 
  Clark, Barry Stewart (1998). Political Economy: A Comparative Approach. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-275-95869-8.
  


• 
  Coates, David (2012). The Oxford Companion to American Politics, Volume 2. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-976431-X.
  


• 
  Fujii, George (2013). "Liberalism". Encyclopedia of the Cold War. Routledge. ISBN 1-135-92311-6.
  


• 
  Lloyd, Gordon; Davenport, David (2013). The New Deal & Modern American Conservatism: A Defining Rivalry. Hoover Press. ISBN 0-817-91686-5.
  


• 
  Grigsby, Ellen (2004). Analyzing Politics. Cengage Learning. ISBN 0-534-63077-4.
  


• 
  Johnston, Larry (2011). Politics: An Introduction to the Modern Democratic State. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 1-4426-0533-2.
  

Further reading

• Barber, William J. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the economists, and American economic policy. Cambridge University Press. (1985)


• Beito, David. Taxpayers in revolt: Tax resistance during the Great Depression. University of North Carolina Press. (1989)


• Brownlee, W. Elliot. Federal taxation in America: A short history. Cambridge University Press. 1996.


• Kimmel, Lewis. Federal budget and fiscal policy, 1789–1958. Brookings Institution Press. 1959.


• Left, Mark. 1983. Taxing the "forgotten man": The politics of Social Security finance in the New Deal. Journal of American History 70 (September): 359-81. online in JSTOR


• Morgan, Iwan W. Deficit government: Taxing and spending in modern America. Ivan Dee. 1995.


• Sargent, James E. "Roosevelt's Economy Act: Fiscal conservatism and the early New Deal." Congressional Studies 7 (winter 1980): 33–51.


• Savage, James D. Balanced budgets & American politics. Cornell University Press. 1988.


• Herbert Stein. Presidential Economics, 3rd Edition: The Making of Economic Policy From Roosevelt to Clinton (1994)


• Julian E. Zelizer; "The Forgotten Legacy of the New Deal: Fiscal Conservatism and the Roosevelt Administration, 1933–1938." Presidential Studies Quarterly. 30#2. (2000). pp 331+. online