How do I write Python unit tests for scripts in my bin directory
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The Python unittest module seems to assume a directory structure for a project in which there's a project root level directory with the source code and tests under that directory.
I would like, however, to write Python scripts in my ~/bin directory and tests for it in another directory (say, ~/dev/tests). Is there a way for me to run the unit tests using the command line interface without setting my PYTHONPATH environment variable and creating __init__.py files and whatnot?
Here's a simple example demonstrating what I want:
~/bin/candy:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
~/dev/tests/test_candy.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
I notice that everything can be done conveniently if:
- The two files are named with py extensions (
candy.pyandtest_candy.py) - The two files are in the same directory
- The test is run with the following in the directory of the tests:
$ python -m unittest test_candy
Can I run python with the unittest module to do the following without setting anything in my environment explicitly:
- My file under test does not have the py extension (just
~/candy). - I don't care if
test_candyhas py as an extension or not. - I want
candyandtest_candy.pyto not share a common root (other than my home directory).
If that's not possible with a simple invocation of python -m unittest, what is the most simple way to accomplish this?
python unit-testing python-unittest
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The Python unittest module seems to assume a directory structure for a project in which there's a project root level directory with the source code and tests under that directory.
I would like, however, to write Python scripts in my ~/bin directory and tests for it in another directory (say, ~/dev/tests). Is there a way for me to run the unit tests using the command line interface without setting my PYTHONPATH environment variable and creating __init__.py files and whatnot?
Here's a simple example demonstrating what I want:
~/bin/candy:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
~/dev/tests/test_candy.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
I notice that everything can be done conveniently if:
- The two files are named with py extensions (
candy.pyandtest_candy.py) - The two files are in the same directory
- The test is run with the following in the directory of the tests:
$ python -m unittest test_candy
Can I run python with the unittest module to do the following without setting anything in my environment explicitly:
- My file under test does not have the py extension (just
~/candy). - I don't care if
test_candyhas py as an extension or not. - I want
candyandtest_candy.pyto not share a common root (other than my home directory).
If that's not possible with a simple invocation of python -m unittest, what is the most simple way to accomplish this?
python unit-testing python-unittest
Why are you writing python files without a.pyextension?
– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
4
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just useimp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build
– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's thedistutils/setuptoolsbuild, then the scripts passed viascriptslist to thesetupfunction are copied tobuild/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.
– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
The Python unittest module seems to assume a directory structure for a project in which there's a project root level directory with the source code and tests under that directory.
I would like, however, to write Python scripts in my ~/bin directory and tests for it in another directory (say, ~/dev/tests). Is there a way for me to run the unit tests using the command line interface without setting my PYTHONPATH environment variable and creating __init__.py files and whatnot?
Here's a simple example demonstrating what I want:
~/bin/candy:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
~/dev/tests/test_candy.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
I notice that everything can be done conveniently if:
- The two files are named with py extensions (
candy.pyandtest_candy.py) - The two files are in the same directory
- The test is run with the following in the directory of the tests:
$ python -m unittest test_candy
Can I run python with the unittest module to do the following without setting anything in my environment explicitly:
- My file under test does not have the py extension (just
~/candy). - I don't care if
test_candyhas py as an extension or not. - I want
candyandtest_candy.pyto not share a common root (other than my home directory).
If that's not possible with a simple invocation of python -m unittest, what is the most simple way to accomplish this?
python unit-testing python-unittest
The Python unittest module seems to assume a directory structure for a project in which there's a project root level directory with the source code and tests under that directory.
I would like, however, to write Python scripts in my ~/bin directory and tests for it in another directory (say, ~/dev/tests). Is there a way for me to run the unit tests using the command line interface without setting my PYTHONPATH environment variable and creating __init__.py files and whatnot?
Here's a simple example demonstrating what I want:
~/bin/candy:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
~/dev/tests/test_candy.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
I notice that everything can be done conveniently if:
- The two files are named with py extensions (
candy.pyandtest_candy.py) - The two files are in the same directory
- The test is run with the following in the directory of the tests:
$ python -m unittest test_candy
Can I run python with the unittest module to do the following without setting anything in my environment explicitly:
- My file under test does not have the py extension (just
~/candy). - I don't care if
test_candyhas py as an extension or not. - I want
candyandtest_candy.pyto not share a common root (other than my home directory).
If that's not possible with a simple invocation of python -m unittest, what is the most simple way to accomplish this?
python unit-testing python-unittest
python unit-testing python-unittest
asked Nov 2 '15 at 1:12
firebush
1,26431320
1,26431320
Why are you writing python files without a.pyextension?
– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
4
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just useimp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build
– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's thedistutils/setuptoolsbuild, then the scripts passed viascriptslist to thesetupfunction are copied tobuild/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.
– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24
add a comment |
Why are you writing python files without a.pyextension?
– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
4
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just useimp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build
– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's thedistutils/setuptoolsbuild, then the scripts passed viascriptslist to thesetupfunction are copied tobuild/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.
– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24
Why are you writing python files without a
.py extension?– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
Why are you writing python files without a
.py extension?– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
4
4
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just use
imp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just use
imp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's the
distutils/setuptools build, then the scripts passed via scripts list to the setup function are copied to build/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's the
distutils/setuptools build, then the scripts passed via scripts list to the setup function are copied to build/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
This is candy executable (no change):
➜ cat ~/bin/candy
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
and this is ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py (changed):
➜ cat ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import imp
import unittest
from os.path import expanduser, join
# use expanduser to locate its home dir and join bin and candy module paths
candy_module_path = join(expanduser("~"), "bin", "candy")
# load the module without .py extension
candy = imp.load_source("candy", candy_module_path)
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
What changed?
We added
imp.load_sourceto import~/bin/candy(a module without*.pyextension)We added provision to locate home directory mention i.e.
~usingexpanduserWe are using
os.path.jointo join the paths for~/bin/candy
Now you can run the tests with discover option of unittest module.
Check python -m unittest --help for more details.
Excerpts below
-s directory Directory to start discovery ('.' default)
-p pattern Pattern to match test files ('test*.py' default)
➜ python -m unittest discover -s ~/bin/ -p 'test*' -v ~/dev/tests
testCandy (test_candy.CandyTestCase) ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s
OK
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have not tried this with unittest, but my quick fix for problems like these are to just change my working directory inside the script using the os module. This SHOULD work for you though.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import os
os.chdir("/usr/bin/candy")
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Short answer, no. The problem is that you need to import the modules you're trying to test, so at least you have to change your PYTHONPATH. My advice is that you change it temporarily as you execute the tests, like this:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['~/dir1','~/dir2','~/anotherdir'])
The solution of @Paritosh_Singh is algo good.
The long run is to install a test runner like tox and configure it so it "sees" your modules. But I think you don't want to do that.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
This is candy executable (no change):
➜ cat ~/bin/candy
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
and this is ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py (changed):
➜ cat ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import imp
import unittest
from os.path import expanduser, join
# use expanduser to locate its home dir and join bin and candy module paths
candy_module_path = join(expanduser("~"), "bin", "candy")
# load the module without .py extension
candy = imp.load_source("candy", candy_module_path)
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
What changed?
We added
imp.load_sourceto import~/bin/candy(a module without*.pyextension)We added provision to locate home directory mention i.e.
~usingexpanduserWe are using
os.path.jointo join the paths for~/bin/candy
Now you can run the tests with discover option of unittest module.
Check python -m unittest --help for more details.
Excerpts below
-s directory Directory to start discovery ('.' default)
-p pattern Pattern to match test files ('test*.py' default)
➜ python -m unittest discover -s ~/bin/ -p 'test*' -v ~/dev/tests
testCandy (test_candy.CandyTestCase) ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s
OK
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
This is candy executable (no change):
➜ cat ~/bin/candy
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
and this is ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py (changed):
➜ cat ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import imp
import unittest
from os.path import expanduser, join
# use expanduser to locate its home dir and join bin and candy module paths
candy_module_path = join(expanduser("~"), "bin", "candy")
# load the module without .py extension
candy = imp.load_source("candy", candy_module_path)
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
What changed?
We added
imp.load_sourceto import~/bin/candy(a module without*.pyextension)We added provision to locate home directory mention i.e.
~usingexpanduserWe are using
os.path.jointo join the paths for~/bin/candy
Now you can run the tests with discover option of unittest module.
Check python -m unittest --help for more details.
Excerpts below
-s directory Directory to start discovery ('.' default)
-p pattern Pattern to match test files ('test*.py' default)
➜ python -m unittest discover -s ~/bin/ -p 'test*' -v ~/dev/tests
testCandy (test_candy.CandyTestCase) ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s
OK
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
This is candy executable (no change):
➜ cat ~/bin/candy
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
and this is ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py (changed):
➜ cat ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import imp
import unittest
from os.path import expanduser, join
# use expanduser to locate its home dir and join bin and candy module paths
candy_module_path = join(expanduser("~"), "bin", "candy")
# load the module without .py extension
candy = imp.load_source("candy", candy_module_path)
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
What changed?
We added
imp.load_sourceto import~/bin/candy(a module without*.pyextension)We added provision to locate home directory mention i.e.
~usingexpanduserWe are using
os.path.jointo join the paths for~/bin/candy
Now you can run the tests with discover option of unittest module.
Check python -m unittest --help for more details.
Excerpts below
-s directory Directory to start discovery ('.' default)
-p pattern Pattern to match test files ('test*.py' default)
➜ python -m unittest discover -s ~/bin/ -p 'test*' -v ~/dev/tests
testCandy (test_candy.CandyTestCase) ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s
OK
This is candy executable (no change):
➜ cat ~/bin/candy
#!/usr/bin/env python
def candy():
return "candy"
if __name__ == '__main__':
print candy()
and this is ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py (changed):
➜ cat ~/dev/tests/test_candy.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import imp
import unittest
from os.path import expanduser, join
# use expanduser to locate its home dir and join bin and candy module paths
candy_module_path = join(expanduser("~"), "bin", "candy")
# load the module without .py extension
candy = imp.load_source("candy", candy_module_path)
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
What changed?
We added
imp.load_sourceto import~/bin/candy(a module without*.pyextension)We added provision to locate home directory mention i.e.
~usingexpanduserWe are using
os.path.jointo join the paths for~/bin/candy
Now you can run the tests with discover option of unittest module.
Check python -m unittest --help for more details.
Excerpts below
-s directory Directory to start discovery ('.' default)
-p pattern Pattern to match test files ('test*.py' default)
➜ python -m unittest discover -s ~/bin/ -p 'test*' -v ~/dev/tests
testCandy (test_candy.CandyTestCase) ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s
OK
answered Nov 14 at 7:47
Navid
487312
487312
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have not tried this with unittest, but my quick fix for problems like these are to just change my working directory inside the script using the os module. This SHOULD work for you though.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import os
os.chdir("/usr/bin/candy")
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have not tried this with unittest, but my quick fix for problems like these are to just change my working directory inside the script using the os module. This SHOULD work for you though.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import os
os.chdir("/usr/bin/candy")
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I have not tried this with unittest, but my quick fix for problems like these are to just change my working directory inside the script using the os module. This SHOULD work for you though.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import os
os.chdir("/usr/bin/candy")
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
I have not tried this with unittest, but my quick fix for problems like these are to just change my working directory inside the script using the os module. This SHOULD work for you though.
#!/usr/bin/env python
import unittest
import os
os.chdir("/usr/bin/candy")
import candy
class CandyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def testCandy(self):
candyOutput = candy.candy()
assert candyOutput == "candy"
answered Nov 10 at 20:59
Paritosh Singh
2116
2116
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Short answer, no. The problem is that you need to import the modules you're trying to test, so at least you have to change your PYTHONPATH. My advice is that you change it temporarily as you execute the tests, like this:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['~/dir1','~/dir2','~/anotherdir'])
The solution of @Paritosh_Singh is algo good.
The long run is to install a test runner like tox and configure it so it "sees" your modules. But I think you don't want to do that.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Short answer, no. The problem is that you need to import the modules you're trying to test, so at least you have to change your PYTHONPATH. My advice is that you change it temporarily as you execute the tests, like this:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['~/dir1','~/dir2','~/anotherdir'])
The solution of @Paritosh_Singh is algo good.
The long run is to install a test runner like tox and configure it so it "sees" your modules. But I think you don't want to do that.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Short answer, no. The problem is that you need to import the modules you're trying to test, so at least you have to change your PYTHONPATH. My advice is that you change it temporarily as you execute the tests, like this:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['~/dir1','~/dir2','~/anotherdir'])
The solution of @Paritosh_Singh is algo good.
The long run is to install a test runner like tox and configure it so it "sees" your modules. But I think you don't want to do that.
Short answer, no. The problem is that you need to import the modules you're trying to test, so at least you have to change your PYTHONPATH. My advice is that you change it temporarily as you execute the tests, like this:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['~/dir1','~/dir2','~/anotherdir'])
The solution of @Paritosh_Singh is algo good.
The long run is to install a test runner like tox and configure it so it "sees" your modules. But I think you don't want to do that.
answered Nov 14 at 1:01
PROW
1427
1427
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f33469246%2fhow-do-i-write-python-unit-tests-for-scripts-in-my-bin-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why are you writing python files without a
.pyextension?– ppperry
Nov 2 '15 at 1:27
4
Modules in a python library should have the .py extension. Executable scripts, on the other hand, be they shell, perl, python, or whatever, don't need .ksh, .bash, .py, etc. extensions because the user of them doesn't need to know how what language they are implemented in to run them. I generally don't name executables with an extension indicating the type of script it is.
– firebush
Nov 3 '15 at 2:51
It's pretty easy to do this for adhoc tests, just use
imp.load_source(MODULE_NAME, 'bin/EXECUTABLE_FILE'), what I find I'm having trouble with is when doing debuild, it's not copying files that don't end in .py to the build dir so those scripts don't get tested in the build– Peter Turner
Nov 8 at 19:55
@PeterTurner can you elaborate a bit more? What kind of build are you performing? If it's the
distutils/setuptoolsbuild, then the scripts passed viascriptslist to thesetupfunction are copied tobuild/scripts-X.Y, where X.Y is the interpreter version.– hoefling
Nov 10 at 23:52
@hoefling, oh, I don't have a "scripts" list I'll have to look that up, I'm just doing a debuild with some parameters, can't remember off-hand, I'll look it up Monday
– Peter Turner
Nov 11 at 18:24