Shared Lambda authorizer setup in Serverless Framework
I am trying to create a custom Lambda authorizer that will be shared between a few different services/serverless stacks. If I understand the documentation here https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/events/apigateway/#note-while-using-authorizers-with-shared-api-gateway, that means that I need to create a shared authorizer resource in a “common resources” service/serverless stack, and then refer to that shared authorizer from my other services. First of all: Is my understanding correct?
If my understanding is correct, my next question becomes: How do I do this? The documentation doesn’t provide a clear example for lambda authorizers, so here’s how I tried to customize it:
functions:
authorizerFunc:
handler: authorizer/authorizer.handler
runtime: nodejs8.10
resources:
Resources:
authorizer:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Authorizer
Properties:
AuthorizerResultTtlInSeconds: 0
Name: Authorizer
Type: REQUEST
AuthorizerUri: ???
RestApiId:
Fn::ImportValue: myRestApiId
I don’t understand what the syntax for AuthorizerUri is supposed to be. I’ve tried “Ref: authorizerFunc”, “Fn::GetAtt: [authorizerFunc, Arn]” etc. to no avail.
When I get the authorizerUri working, do I just add an Output for my authorizer resource, then Fn::ImportValue it from the services containing my API Lambdas?
Link to my question on the Serverless forum for posterity: https://forum.serverless.com/t/shared-lambda-authorizer/6447
amazon-web-services serverless-framework
add a comment |
I am trying to create a custom Lambda authorizer that will be shared between a few different services/serverless stacks. If I understand the documentation here https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/events/apigateway/#note-while-using-authorizers-with-shared-api-gateway, that means that I need to create a shared authorizer resource in a “common resources” service/serverless stack, and then refer to that shared authorizer from my other services. First of all: Is my understanding correct?
If my understanding is correct, my next question becomes: How do I do this? The documentation doesn’t provide a clear example for lambda authorizers, so here’s how I tried to customize it:
functions:
authorizerFunc:
handler: authorizer/authorizer.handler
runtime: nodejs8.10
resources:
Resources:
authorizer:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Authorizer
Properties:
AuthorizerResultTtlInSeconds: 0
Name: Authorizer
Type: REQUEST
AuthorizerUri: ???
RestApiId:
Fn::ImportValue: myRestApiId
I don’t understand what the syntax for AuthorizerUri is supposed to be. I’ve tried “Ref: authorizerFunc”, “Fn::GetAtt: [authorizerFunc, Arn]” etc. to no avail.
When I get the authorizerUri working, do I just add an Output for my authorizer resource, then Fn::ImportValue it from the services containing my API Lambdas?
Link to my question on the Serverless forum for posterity: https://forum.serverless.com/t/shared-lambda-authorizer/6447
amazon-web-services serverless-framework
add a comment |
I am trying to create a custom Lambda authorizer that will be shared between a few different services/serverless stacks. If I understand the documentation here https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/events/apigateway/#note-while-using-authorizers-with-shared-api-gateway, that means that I need to create a shared authorizer resource in a “common resources” service/serverless stack, and then refer to that shared authorizer from my other services. First of all: Is my understanding correct?
If my understanding is correct, my next question becomes: How do I do this? The documentation doesn’t provide a clear example for lambda authorizers, so here’s how I tried to customize it:
functions:
authorizerFunc:
handler: authorizer/authorizer.handler
runtime: nodejs8.10
resources:
Resources:
authorizer:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Authorizer
Properties:
AuthorizerResultTtlInSeconds: 0
Name: Authorizer
Type: REQUEST
AuthorizerUri: ???
RestApiId:
Fn::ImportValue: myRestApiId
I don’t understand what the syntax for AuthorizerUri is supposed to be. I’ve tried “Ref: authorizerFunc”, “Fn::GetAtt: [authorizerFunc, Arn]” etc. to no avail.
When I get the authorizerUri working, do I just add an Output for my authorizer resource, then Fn::ImportValue it from the services containing my API Lambdas?
Link to my question on the Serverless forum for posterity: https://forum.serverless.com/t/shared-lambda-authorizer/6447
amazon-web-services serverless-framework
I am trying to create a custom Lambda authorizer that will be shared between a few different services/serverless stacks. If I understand the documentation here https://serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/events/apigateway/#note-while-using-authorizers-with-shared-api-gateway, that means that I need to create a shared authorizer resource in a “common resources” service/serverless stack, and then refer to that shared authorizer from my other services. First of all: Is my understanding correct?
If my understanding is correct, my next question becomes: How do I do this? The documentation doesn’t provide a clear example for lambda authorizers, so here’s how I tried to customize it:
functions:
authorizerFunc:
handler: authorizer/authorizer.handler
runtime: nodejs8.10
resources:
Resources:
authorizer:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Authorizer
Properties:
AuthorizerResultTtlInSeconds: 0
Name: Authorizer
Type: REQUEST
AuthorizerUri: ???
RestApiId:
Fn::ImportValue: myRestApiId
I don’t understand what the syntax for AuthorizerUri is supposed to be. I’ve tried “Ref: authorizerFunc”, “Fn::GetAtt: [authorizerFunc, Arn]” etc. to no avail.
When I get the authorizerUri working, do I just add an Output for my authorizer resource, then Fn::ImportValue it from the services containing my API Lambdas?
Link to my question on the Serverless forum for posterity: https://forum.serverless.com/t/shared-lambda-authorizer/6447
amazon-web-services serverless-framework
amazon-web-services serverless-framework
asked Nov 14 '18 at 14:15
DanDan
185
185
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I had the same issue that you describe. Or at least I think so. And I managed to get it solved by following the documentation on links you provided.
The serverless documentation states for the authorizer format to be
authorizer:
# Provide both type and authorizerId
type: COGNITO_USER_POOLS # TOKEN or COGNITO_USER_POOLS, same as AWS Cloudformation documentation
authorizerId:
Ref: ApiGatewayAuthorizer # or hard-code Authorizer ID
Per my understanding, my solution (provide below) follows the hard-coded authorizer ID approach.
In the service that has the shared authorizer, it is declared in the serverless.yml in normal fashion, i.e.
functions:
myCustomAuthorizer:
handler: path/to/authorizer.handler
name: my-shared-custom-authorizer
Then in the service that wishes to use this shared authorizer, the function in servlerless.yml is declared as
functions:
foo:
# some properties ...
events:
- http:
# ... other properties ...
authorizer:
name: authorize
arn:
Fn::Join:
- ""
- - "arn:aws:lambda"
# References to values such as region, account id, stage, etc
# Can be done with Pseudo Parameter Reference
- ":"
- "function:myCustomAuthorizer"
It was crucial to add the name property. It would not work without it, at least at the moment.
For details see
- ARN naming conventions
- Pseudo Parameter Reference
- Fn::Join
Unfortunately I cannot say whether this approach has some limitations compared to your suggestion of defining authorizer as a resource. In fact, that might make it easier to re-use the same authorizer in multiple functions within same service.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53302266%2fshared-lambda-authorizer-setup-in-serverless-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I had the same issue that you describe. Or at least I think so. And I managed to get it solved by following the documentation on links you provided.
The serverless documentation states for the authorizer format to be
authorizer:
# Provide both type and authorizerId
type: COGNITO_USER_POOLS # TOKEN or COGNITO_USER_POOLS, same as AWS Cloudformation documentation
authorizerId:
Ref: ApiGatewayAuthorizer # or hard-code Authorizer ID
Per my understanding, my solution (provide below) follows the hard-coded authorizer ID approach.
In the service that has the shared authorizer, it is declared in the serverless.yml in normal fashion, i.e.
functions:
myCustomAuthorizer:
handler: path/to/authorizer.handler
name: my-shared-custom-authorizer
Then in the service that wishes to use this shared authorizer, the function in servlerless.yml is declared as
functions:
foo:
# some properties ...
events:
- http:
# ... other properties ...
authorizer:
name: authorize
arn:
Fn::Join:
- ""
- - "arn:aws:lambda"
# References to values such as region, account id, stage, etc
# Can be done with Pseudo Parameter Reference
- ":"
- "function:myCustomAuthorizer"
It was crucial to add the name property. It would not work without it, at least at the moment.
For details see
- ARN naming conventions
- Pseudo Parameter Reference
- Fn::Join
Unfortunately I cannot say whether this approach has some limitations compared to your suggestion of defining authorizer as a resource. In fact, that might make it easier to re-use the same authorizer in multiple functions within same service.
add a comment |
I had the same issue that you describe. Or at least I think so. And I managed to get it solved by following the documentation on links you provided.
The serverless documentation states for the authorizer format to be
authorizer:
# Provide both type and authorizerId
type: COGNITO_USER_POOLS # TOKEN or COGNITO_USER_POOLS, same as AWS Cloudformation documentation
authorizerId:
Ref: ApiGatewayAuthorizer # or hard-code Authorizer ID
Per my understanding, my solution (provide below) follows the hard-coded authorizer ID approach.
In the service that has the shared authorizer, it is declared in the serverless.yml in normal fashion, i.e.
functions:
myCustomAuthorizer:
handler: path/to/authorizer.handler
name: my-shared-custom-authorizer
Then in the service that wishes to use this shared authorizer, the function in servlerless.yml is declared as
functions:
foo:
# some properties ...
events:
- http:
# ... other properties ...
authorizer:
name: authorize
arn:
Fn::Join:
- ""
- - "arn:aws:lambda"
# References to values such as region, account id, stage, etc
# Can be done with Pseudo Parameter Reference
- ":"
- "function:myCustomAuthorizer"
It was crucial to add the name property. It would not work without it, at least at the moment.
For details see
- ARN naming conventions
- Pseudo Parameter Reference
- Fn::Join
Unfortunately I cannot say whether this approach has some limitations compared to your suggestion of defining authorizer as a resource. In fact, that might make it easier to re-use the same authorizer in multiple functions within same service.
add a comment |
I had the same issue that you describe. Or at least I think so. And I managed to get it solved by following the documentation on links you provided.
The serverless documentation states for the authorizer format to be
authorizer:
# Provide both type and authorizerId
type: COGNITO_USER_POOLS # TOKEN or COGNITO_USER_POOLS, same as AWS Cloudformation documentation
authorizerId:
Ref: ApiGatewayAuthorizer # or hard-code Authorizer ID
Per my understanding, my solution (provide below) follows the hard-coded authorizer ID approach.
In the service that has the shared authorizer, it is declared in the serverless.yml in normal fashion, i.e.
functions:
myCustomAuthorizer:
handler: path/to/authorizer.handler
name: my-shared-custom-authorizer
Then in the service that wishes to use this shared authorizer, the function in servlerless.yml is declared as
functions:
foo:
# some properties ...
events:
- http:
# ... other properties ...
authorizer:
name: authorize
arn:
Fn::Join:
- ""
- - "arn:aws:lambda"
# References to values such as region, account id, stage, etc
# Can be done with Pseudo Parameter Reference
- ":"
- "function:myCustomAuthorizer"
It was crucial to add the name property. It would not work without it, at least at the moment.
For details see
- ARN naming conventions
- Pseudo Parameter Reference
- Fn::Join
Unfortunately I cannot say whether this approach has some limitations compared to your suggestion of defining authorizer as a resource. In fact, that might make it easier to re-use the same authorizer in multiple functions within same service.
I had the same issue that you describe. Or at least I think so. And I managed to get it solved by following the documentation on links you provided.
The serverless documentation states for the authorizer format to be
authorizer:
# Provide both type and authorizerId
type: COGNITO_USER_POOLS # TOKEN or COGNITO_USER_POOLS, same as AWS Cloudformation documentation
authorizerId:
Ref: ApiGatewayAuthorizer # or hard-code Authorizer ID
Per my understanding, my solution (provide below) follows the hard-coded authorizer ID approach.
In the service that has the shared authorizer, it is declared in the serverless.yml in normal fashion, i.e.
functions:
myCustomAuthorizer:
handler: path/to/authorizer.handler
name: my-shared-custom-authorizer
Then in the service that wishes to use this shared authorizer, the function in servlerless.yml is declared as
functions:
foo:
# some properties ...
events:
- http:
# ... other properties ...
authorizer:
name: authorize
arn:
Fn::Join:
- ""
- - "arn:aws:lambda"
# References to values such as region, account id, stage, etc
# Can be done with Pseudo Parameter Reference
- ":"
- "function:myCustomAuthorizer"
It was crucial to add the name property. It would not work without it, at least at the moment.
For details see
- ARN naming conventions
- Pseudo Parameter Reference
- Fn::Join
Unfortunately I cannot say whether this approach has some limitations compared to your suggestion of defining authorizer as a resource. In fact, that might make it easier to re-use the same authorizer in multiple functions within same service.
answered Jan 28 at 11:34
kaskelottikaskelotti
1,70983256
1,70983256
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53302266%2fshared-lambda-authorizer-setup-in-serverless-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown