Grok “or” around multiple “or” patterns?
Is this possible.
I don't have the regex to hand, but in "pseudo" regex i have so far is:
(Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)
This works, if it is an IP alone, it matches. If it an IP:PORT it matches. But what I want is:
((Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)) | ((somethingElse:ANOTHERGROK ) | (soemthingElse:ANOTHERGROK2))
I've tried lots of combinations but nothing works so far.
regex logstash logstash-grok
add a comment |
Is this possible.
I don't have the regex to hand, but in "pseudo" regex i have so far is:
(Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)
This works, if it is an IP alone, it matches. If it an IP:PORT it matches. But what I want is:
((Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)) | ((somethingElse:ANOTHERGROK ) | (soemthingElse:ANOTHERGROK2))
I've tried lots of combinations but nothing works so far.
regex logstash logstash-grok
add a comment |
Is this possible.
I don't have the regex to hand, but in "pseudo" regex i have so far is:
(Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)
This works, if it is an IP alone, it matches. If it an IP:PORT it matches. But what I want is:
((Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)) | ((somethingElse:ANOTHERGROK ) | (soemthingElse:ANOTHERGROK2))
I've tried lots of combinations but nothing works so far.
regex logstash logstash-grok
Is this possible.
I don't have the regex to hand, but in "pseudo" regex i have so far is:
(Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)
This works, if it is an IP alone, it matches. If it an IP:PORT it matches. But what I want is:
((Client_id:IP) | (Cient_id:IPPORT)) | ((somethingElse:ANOTHERGROK ) | (soemthingElse:ANOTHERGROK2))
I've tried lots of combinations but nothing works so far.
regex logstash logstash-grok
regex logstash logstash-grok
edited Nov 12 '18 at 12:55
baudsp
2,89911125
2,89911125
asked Nov 9 '18 at 18:07
xeon48
6651926
6651926
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There are lots of complex regular expressions in the built-in patterns. Looking there can sometimes yield good results.
For you, I noticed [HTTPD_COMMONLOG][1], which contains:
%{NUMBER:response} (?:%{NUMBER:bytes}|-)
So you can see how they combine one pattern ("response") with another pattern that contains the "or" ("bytes").
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53231171%2fgrok-or-around-multiple-or-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are lots of complex regular expressions in the built-in patterns. Looking there can sometimes yield good results.
For you, I noticed [HTTPD_COMMONLOG][1], which contains:
%{NUMBER:response} (?:%{NUMBER:bytes}|-)
So you can see how they combine one pattern ("response") with another pattern that contains the "or" ("bytes").
add a comment |
There are lots of complex regular expressions in the built-in patterns. Looking there can sometimes yield good results.
For you, I noticed [HTTPD_COMMONLOG][1], which contains:
%{NUMBER:response} (?:%{NUMBER:bytes}|-)
So you can see how they combine one pattern ("response") with another pattern that contains the "or" ("bytes").
add a comment |
There are lots of complex regular expressions in the built-in patterns. Looking there can sometimes yield good results.
For you, I noticed [HTTPD_COMMONLOG][1], which contains:
%{NUMBER:response} (?:%{NUMBER:bytes}|-)
So you can see how they combine one pattern ("response") with another pattern that contains the "or" ("bytes").
There are lots of complex regular expressions in the built-in patterns. Looking there can sometimes yield good results.
For you, I noticed [HTTPD_COMMONLOG][1], which contains:
%{NUMBER:response} (?:%{NUMBER:bytes}|-)
So you can see how they combine one pattern ("response") with another pattern that contains the "or" ("bytes").
answered Nov 9 '18 at 19:49
Alain Collins
13.5k12147
13.5k12147
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53231171%2fgrok-or-around-multiple-or-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown