How to remove a key from a Python dictionary?











up vote
1195
down vote

favorite
153












When trying to delete a key from a dictionary, I write:



if 'key' in myDict:
del myDict['key']


Is there a one line way of doing this?










share|improve this question




















  • 14




    Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:19















up vote
1195
down vote

favorite
153












When trying to delete a key from a dictionary, I write:



if 'key' in myDict:
del myDict['key']


Is there a one line way of doing this?










share|improve this question




















  • 14




    Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:19













up vote
1195
down vote

favorite
153









up vote
1195
down vote

favorite
153






153





When trying to delete a key from a dictionary, I write:



if 'key' in myDict:
del myDict['key']


Is there a one line way of doing this?










share|improve this question















When trying to delete a key from a dictionary, I write:



if 'key' in myDict:
del myDict['key']


Is there a one line way of doing this?







python dictionary unset






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 29 at 13:43









Peter Mortensen

13.4k1983111




13.4k1983111










asked Jun 30 '12 at 20:27









Tony

10.4k93668




10.4k93668








  • 14




    Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:19














  • 14




    Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:19








14




14




Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
– zigg
Aug 20 '13 at 12:19




Benchmark script for the various methods proposed in the answers to this question: gist.github.com/zigg/6280653
– zigg
Aug 20 '13 at 12:19












8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1991
down vote



accepted










Use dict.pop():



my_dict.pop('key', None)


This will return my_dict[key] if key exists in the dictionary, and None otherwise. If the second parameter is not specified (ie. my_dict.pop('key')) and key does not exist, a KeyError is raised.






share|improve this answer



















  • 85




    Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
    – kratenko
    Aug 18 '13 at 12:21






  • 3




    In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
    – Salvatore Cosentino
    Jun 14 '17 at 2:05






  • 5




    @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 13:52






  • 13




    @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 18:44






  • 3




    @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
    – Sven Marnach
    Aug 2 at 10:09


















up vote
286
down vote













Specifically to answer "is there a one line way of doing this?"



if 'key' in myDict: del myDict['key']


...well, you asked ;-)



You should consider, though, that this way of deleting an object from a dict is not atomic—it is possible that 'key' may be in myDict during the if statement, but may be deleted before del is executed, in which case del will fail with a KeyError. Given this, it would be safest to either use dict.pop or something along the lines of



try:
del myDict['key']
except KeyError:
pass


which, of course, is definitely not a one-liner.






share|improve this answer



















  • 15




    Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
    – zigg
    Jul 1 '12 at 16:30






  • 2




    The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
    – Chris Barker
    Aug 20 '13 at 5:01






  • 7




    @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:18








  • 4




    I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
    – Juan Carlos Coto
    Jun 30 '14 at 21:15






  • 1




    regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
    – Marc
    Jul 9 '15 at 18:00


















up vote
120
down vote













It took me some time to figure out what exactly my_dict.pop("key", None) is doing. So I'll add this as an answer to save others googling time:




pop(key[, default])



If key is in the dictionary, remove it and return its value, else
return default. If default is not given and key is not in the
dictionary, a KeyError is raised




Documentation






share|improve this answer



















  • 10




    Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:07






  • 10




    help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:08






  • 2




    or dict.pop? in IPython.
    – Erik Allik
    Apr 13 '14 at 1:09






  • 3




    Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
    – Michael
    Apr 30 '14 at 21:57


















up vote
27
down vote













Timing of the three solutions described above.



Small dictionary:



>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d.pop('a')")
0.23399464370632472
>>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; del d['a']")
0.15225347193388927
>>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 'a'}")
0.5365207354998063


Larger dictionary:



>>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d.pop(3)")
5.478138627299643
>>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; del d[3]")
5.362219126590048
>>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 3}")
13.93129749387532





share|improve this answer

















  • 13




    Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
    – user1767754
    Dec 20 '17 at 6:46






  • 1




    I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
    – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
    Oct 17 at 13:57




















up vote
24
down vote













If you need to remove a lot of keys from a dictionary in one line of code, I think using map() is quite succinct and Pythonic readable:



myDict = {'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4}
map(myDict.pop, ['a','c']) # The list of keys to remove
>>> myDict
{'b': 2, 'd': 4}


And if you need to catch errors where you pop a value that isn't in the dictionary, use lambda inside map() like this:



map(lambda x: myDict.pop(x,None), ['a','c','e'])
[1, 3, None] # pop returns
>>> myDict
{'b': 2, 'd': 4}


It works. And 'e' did not cause an error, even though myDict did not have an 'e' key.






share|improve this answer



















  • 30




    This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
    – Greg Krimer
    Nov 7 '15 at 16:31






  • 2




    Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
    – Michael Ekoka
    Oct 22 '17 at 8:48


















up vote
16
down vote













Use:



>>> if myDict.get(key): myDict.pop(key)


Another way:



>>> {k:v for k, v in myDict.items() if k != 'key'}


You can delete by conditions. No error if key doesn't exist.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
    – Artyer
    Jun 29 '17 at 15:53










  • I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
    – Matthias Herrmann
    Sep 12 '17 at 17:21


















up vote
8
down vote













Using the "del" keyword:



del dict[key]





share|improve this answer























  • Neat solution for deleting key in dict
    – Ajay Kumar
    May 8 at 9:54


















up vote
5
down vote













We can delete a key from a Python dictionary by the some following approaches.



Using the del keyword; it's almost the same approach like you did though -



 myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300 }
print(myDict) # {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
if myDict.get('one') : del myDict['one']
print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


Or



We can do like following:



But one should keep in mind that, in this process actually it won't delete any key from the dictionary rather than making specific key excluded from that dictionary. In addition, I observed that it returned a dictionary which was not ordered the same as myDict.



myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}
{key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


If we run it in the shell, it'll execute something like {'five': 500, 'four': 400, 'three': 300, 'two': 200} - notice that it's not the same ordered as myDict. Again if we try to print myDict, then we can see all keys including which we excluded from the dictionary by this approach. However, we can make a new dictionary by assigning the following statement into a variable:



var = {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


Now if we try to print it, then it'll follow the parent order:



print(var) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}


Or



Using the pop() method.



myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
print(myDict)

if myDict.get('one') : myDict.pop('one')
print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


The difference between del and pop is that, using pop() method, we can actually store the key's value if needed, like the following:



myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
if myDict.get('one') : var = myDict.pop('one')
print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}
print(var) # 100


Fork this gist for future reference, if you find this useful.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11277432%2fhow-to-remove-a-key-from-a-python-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    8 Answers
    8






    active

    oldest

    votes








    8 Answers
    8






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1991
    down vote



    accepted










    Use dict.pop():



    my_dict.pop('key', None)


    This will return my_dict[key] if key exists in the dictionary, and None otherwise. If the second parameter is not specified (ie. my_dict.pop('key')) and key does not exist, a KeyError is raised.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 85




      Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
      – kratenko
      Aug 18 '13 at 12:21






    • 3




      In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
      – Salvatore Cosentino
      Jun 14 '17 at 2:05






    • 5




      @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 13:52






    • 13




      @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 18:44






    • 3




      @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
      – Sven Marnach
      Aug 2 at 10:09















    up vote
    1991
    down vote



    accepted










    Use dict.pop():



    my_dict.pop('key', None)


    This will return my_dict[key] if key exists in the dictionary, and None otherwise. If the second parameter is not specified (ie. my_dict.pop('key')) and key does not exist, a KeyError is raised.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 85




      Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
      – kratenko
      Aug 18 '13 at 12:21






    • 3




      In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
      – Salvatore Cosentino
      Jun 14 '17 at 2:05






    • 5




      @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 13:52






    • 13




      @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 18:44






    • 3




      @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
      – Sven Marnach
      Aug 2 at 10:09













    up vote
    1991
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1991
    down vote



    accepted






    Use dict.pop():



    my_dict.pop('key', None)


    This will return my_dict[key] if key exists in the dictionary, and None otherwise. If the second parameter is not specified (ie. my_dict.pop('key')) and key does not exist, a KeyError is raised.






    share|improve this answer














    Use dict.pop():



    my_dict.pop('key', None)


    This will return my_dict[key] if key exists in the dictionary, and None otherwise. If the second parameter is not specified (ie. my_dict.pop('key')) and key does not exist, a KeyError is raised.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 5 '16 at 23:23









    yiwei

    1,58052743




    1,58052743










    answered Jun 30 '12 at 20:29









    Sven Marnach

    342k76741692




    342k76741692








    • 85




      Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
      – kratenko
      Aug 18 '13 at 12:21






    • 3




      In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
      – Salvatore Cosentino
      Jun 14 '17 at 2:05






    • 5




      @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 13:52






    • 13




      @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 18:44






    • 3




      @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
      – Sven Marnach
      Aug 2 at 10:09














    • 85




      Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
      – kratenko
      Aug 18 '13 at 12:21






    • 3




      In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
      – Salvatore Cosentino
      Jun 14 '17 at 2:05






    • 5




      @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 13:52






    • 13




      @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
      – Sven Marnach
      Jun 15 '17 at 18:44






    • 3




      @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
      – Sven Marnach
      Aug 2 at 10:09








    85




    85




    Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
    – kratenko
    Aug 18 '13 at 12:21




    Sometimes an advantage of using pop() over del: it returns the value for that key. This way you can get and delete an entry from a dict in one line of code.
    – kratenko
    Aug 18 '13 at 12:21




    3




    3




    In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
    – Salvatore Cosentino
    Jun 14 '17 at 2:05




    In the question it is not required to keep the value. This would only add unneeded complexity. The answer from @zigg (below) is much better.
    – Salvatore Cosentino
    Jun 14 '17 at 2:05




    5




    5




    @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 13:52




    @SalvatoreCosentino I can't follow your argument. How is the code in this answer more complex than the code in in the other answer?
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 13:52




    13




    13




    @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 18:44




    @SalvatoreCosentino No, ignoring the return value of a function is not inefficient at all. Quite the opposite – this solution is much faster than the try/except solution if the key does not exist. You might find one or the other easier to read, which is fine. Both are idiomatic Python, so choose whatever you prefer. But claiming that this answer is more complex or inefficient simply makes no sense.
    – Sven Marnach
    Jun 15 '17 at 18:44




    3




    3




    @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
    – Sven Marnach
    Aug 2 at 10:09




    @user5359531 I don't understand. How is this a problem? None of the methods on Python's built-in types returns self, so it would be rather surprising if this one did.
    – Sven Marnach
    Aug 2 at 10:09












    up vote
    286
    down vote













    Specifically to answer "is there a one line way of doing this?"



    if 'key' in myDict: del myDict['key']


    ...well, you asked ;-)



    You should consider, though, that this way of deleting an object from a dict is not atomic—it is possible that 'key' may be in myDict during the if statement, but may be deleted before del is executed, in which case del will fail with a KeyError. Given this, it would be safest to either use dict.pop or something along the lines of



    try:
    del myDict['key']
    except KeyError:
    pass


    which, of course, is definitely not a one-liner.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 15




      Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
      – zigg
      Jul 1 '12 at 16:30






    • 2




      The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
      – Chris Barker
      Aug 20 '13 at 5:01






    • 7




      @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
      – zigg
      Aug 20 '13 at 12:18








    • 4




      I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
      – Juan Carlos Coto
      Jun 30 '14 at 21:15






    • 1




      regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
      – Marc
      Jul 9 '15 at 18:00















    up vote
    286
    down vote













    Specifically to answer "is there a one line way of doing this?"



    if 'key' in myDict: del myDict['key']


    ...well, you asked ;-)



    You should consider, though, that this way of deleting an object from a dict is not atomic—it is possible that 'key' may be in myDict during the if statement, but may be deleted before del is executed, in which case del will fail with a KeyError. Given this, it would be safest to either use dict.pop or something along the lines of



    try:
    del myDict['key']
    except KeyError:
    pass


    which, of course, is definitely not a one-liner.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 15




      Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
      – zigg
      Jul 1 '12 at 16:30






    • 2




      The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
      – Chris Barker
      Aug 20 '13 at 5:01






    • 7




      @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
      – zigg
      Aug 20 '13 at 12:18








    • 4




      I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
      – Juan Carlos Coto
      Jun 30 '14 at 21:15






    • 1




      regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
      – Marc
      Jul 9 '15 at 18:00













    up vote
    286
    down vote










    up vote
    286
    down vote









    Specifically to answer "is there a one line way of doing this?"



    if 'key' in myDict: del myDict['key']


    ...well, you asked ;-)



    You should consider, though, that this way of deleting an object from a dict is not atomic—it is possible that 'key' may be in myDict during the if statement, but may be deleted before del is executed, in which case del will fail with a KeyError. Given this, it would be safest to either use dict.pop or something along the lines of



    try:
    del myDict['key']
    except KeyError:
    pass


    which, of course, is definitely not a one-liner.






    share|improve this answer














    Specifically to answer "is there a one line way of doing this?"



    if 'key' in myDict: del myDict['key']


    ...well, you asked ;-)



    You should consider, though, that this way of deleting an object from a dict is not atomic—it is possible that 'key' may be in myDict during the if statement, but may be deleted before del is executed, in which case del will fail with a KeyError. Given this, it would be safest to either use dict.pop or something along the lines of



    try:
    del myDict['key']
    except KeyError:
    pass


    which, of course, is definitely not a one-liner.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 23 '17 at 11:47









    Community

    11




    11










    answered Jun 30 '12 at 20:36









    zigg

    12.5k42749




    12.5k42749








    • 15




      Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
      – zigg
      Jul 1 '12 at 16:30






    • 2




      The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
      – Chris Barker
      Aug 20 '13 at 5:01






    • 7




      @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
      – zigg
      Aug 20 '13 at 12:18








    • 4




      I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
      – Juan Carlos Coto
      Jun 30 '14 at 21:15






    • 1




      regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
      – Marc
      Jul 9 '15 at 18:00














    • 15




      Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
      – zigg
      Jul 1 '12 at 16:30






    • 2




      The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
      – Chris Barker
      Aug 20 '13 at 5:01






    • 7




      @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
      – zigg
      Aug 20 '13 at 12:18








    • 4




      I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
      – Juan Carlos Coto
      Jun 30 '14 at 21:15






    • 1




      regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
      – Marc
      Jul 9 '15 at 18:00








    15




    15




    Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
    – zigg
    Jul 1 '12 at 16:30




    Yeah, pop is a definitely more concise, though there is one key advantage of doing it this way: it's immediately clear what it's doing.
    – zigg
    Jul 1 '12 at 16:30




    2




    2




    The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
    – Chris Barker
    Aug 20 '13 at 5:01




    The try/except statement is more expensive. Raising an exception is slow.
    – Chris Barker
    Aug 20 '13 at 5:01




    7




    7




    @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:18






    @ChrisBarker I've found if the key exists, try is marginally faster, though if it doesn't, try is indeed a good deal slower. pop is fairly consistent but slower than all but try with a non-present key. See gist.github.com/zigg/6280653. Ultimately, it depends on how often you expect the key to actually be in the dictionary, and whether or not you need atomicity—and, of course, whether or not you're engaging in premature optimization ;)
    – zigg
    Aug 20 '13 at 12:18






    4




    4




    I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
    – Juan Carlos Coto
    Jun 30 '14 at 21:15




    I believe the value of clarity should not be overlooked. +1 for this.
    – Juan Carlos Coto
    Jun 30 '14 at 21:15




    1




    1




    regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
    – Marc
    Jul 9 '15 at 18:00




    regarding expense of try/except, you can also go if 'key' in mydict: #then del.... I needed to pull out a key/val from a dict to parse correctly, pop was not a perfect solution.
    – Marc
    Jul 9 '15 at 18:00










    up vote
    120
    down vote













    It took me some time to figure out what exactly my_dict.pop("key", None) is doing. So I'll add this as an answer to save others googling time:




    pop(key[, default])



    If key is in the dictionary, remove it and return its value, else
    return default. If default is not given and key is not in the
    dictionary, a KeyError is raised




    Documentation






    share|improve this answer



















    • 10




      Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:07






    • 10




      help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:08






    • 2




      or dict.pop? in IPython.
      – Erik Allik
      Apr 13 '14 at 1:09






    • 3




      Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
      – Michael
      Apr 30 '14 at 21:57















    up vote
    120
    down vote













    It took me some time to figure out what exactly my_dict.pop("key", None) is doing. So I'll add this as an answer to save others googling time:




    pop(key[, default])



    If key is in the dictionary, remove it and return its value, else
    return default. If default is not given and key is not in the
    dictionary, a KeyError is raised




    Documentation






    share|improve this answer



















    • 10




      Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:07






    • 10




      help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:08






    • 2




      or dict.pop? in IPython.
      – Erik Allik
      Apr 13 '14 at 1:09






    • 3




      Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
      – Michael
      Apr 30 '14 at 21:57













    up vote
    120
    down vote










    up vote
    120
    down vote









    It took me some time to figure out what exactly my_dict.pop("key", None) is doing. So I'll add this as an answer to save others googling time:




    pop(key[, default])



    If key is in the dictionary, remove it and return its value, else
    return default. If default is not given and key is not in the
    dictionary, a KeyError is raised




    Documentation






    share|improve this answer














    It took me some time to figure out what exactly my_dict.pop("key", None) is doing. So I'll add this as an answer to save others googling time:




    pop(key[, default])



    If key is in the dictionary, remove it and return its value, else
    return default. If default is not given and key is not in the
    dictionary, a KeyError is raised




    Documentation







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 27 '15 at 17:29









    Community

    11




    11










    answered Mar 4 '13 at 16:43









    Akavall

    39.3k30136176




    39.3k30136176








    • 10




      Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:07






    • 10




      help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:08






    • 2




      or dict.pop? in IPython.
      – Erik Allik
      Apr 13 '14 at 1:09






    • 3




      Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
      – Michael
      Apr 30 '14 at 21:57














    • 10




      Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:07






    • 10




      help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
      – David Mulder
      Aug 6 '13 at 18:08






    • 2




      or dict.pop? in IPython.
      – Erik Allik
      Apr 13 '14 at 1:09






    • 3




      Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
      – Michael
      Apr 30 '14 at 21:57








    10




    10




    Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:07




    Just type help(dict.pop) in the python interpreter.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:07




    10




    10




    help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:08




    help() and dir() can be your friends when you need to know what something does.
    – David Mulder
    Aug 6 '13 at 18:08




    2




    2




    or dict.pop? in IPython.
    – Erik Allik
    Apr 13 '14 at 1:09




    or dict.pop? in IPython.
    – Erik Allik
    Apr 13 '14 at 1:09




    3




    3




    Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
    – Michael
    Apr 30 '14 at 21:57




    Also, the accepted answer had a link to the documentation (with an anchor to the function).
    – Michael
    Apr 30 '14 at 21:57










    up vote
    27
    down vote













    Timing of the three solutions described above.



    Small dictionary:



    >>> import timeit
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d.pop('a')")
    0.23399464370632472
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; del d['a']")
    0.15225347193388927
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 'a'}")
    0.5365207354998063


    Larger dictionary:



    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d.pop(3)")
    5.478138627299643
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; del d[3]")
    5.362219126590048
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 3}")
    13.93129749387532





    share|improve this answer

















    • 13




      Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
      – user1767754
      Dec 20 '17 at 6:46






    • 1




      I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
      – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
      Oct 17 at 13:57

















    up vote
    27
    down vote













    Timing of the three solutions described above.



    Small dictionary:



    >>> import timeit
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d.pop('a')")
    0.23399464370632472
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; del d['a']")
    0.15225347193388927
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 'a'}")
    0.5365207354998063


    Larger dictionary:



    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d.pop(3)")
    5.478138627299643
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; del d[3]")
    5.362219126590048
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 3}")
    13.93129749387532





    share|improve this answer

















    • 13




      Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
      – user1767754
      Dec 20 '17 at 6:46






    • 1




      I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
      – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
      Oct 17 at 13:57















    up vote
    27
    down vote










    up vote
    27
    down vote









    Timing of the three solutions described above.



    Small dictionary:



    >>> import timeit
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d.pop('a')")
    0.23399464370632472
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; del d['a']")
    0.15225347193388927
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 'a'}")
    0.5365207354998063


    Larger dictionary:



    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d.pop(3)")
    5.478138627299643
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; del d[3]")
    5.362219126590048
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 3}")
    13.93129749387532





    share|improve this answer












    Timing of the three solutions described above.



    Small dictionary:



    >>> import timeit
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d.pop('a')")
    0.23399464370632472
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; del d['a']")
    0.15225347193388927
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={'a':1}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 'a'}")
    0.5365207354998063


    Larger dictionary:



    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d.pop(3)")
    5.478138627299643
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; del d[3]")
    5.362219126590048
    >>> timeit.timeit("d={nr: nr for nr in range(100)}; d2 = {key: val for key, val in d.items() if key != 3}")
    13.93129749387532






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 7 '16 at 12:19









    Peter Smit

    695714




    695714








    • 13




      Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
      – user1767754
      Dec 20 '17 at 6:46






    • 1




      I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
      – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
      Oct 17 at 13:57
















    • 13




      Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
      – user1767754
      Dec 20 '17 at 6:46






    • 1




      I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
      – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
      Oct 17 at 13:57










    13




    13




    Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
    – user1767754
    Dec 20 '17 at 6:46




    Normally people do write a conclusion rather than just dumping some benchmarks.
    – user1767754
    Dec 20 '17 at 6:46




    1




    1




    I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
    – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
    Oct 17 at 13:57






    I'll wrap it up for user1767754 : del ist the fastest method for removing a key from a Python dictionary
    – Cpt_Jauchefuerst
    Oct 17 at 13:57












    up vote
    24
    down vote













    If you need to remove a lot of keys from a dictionary in one line of code, I think using map() is quite succinct and Pythonic readable:



    myDict = {'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4}
    map(myDict.pop, ['a','c']) # The list of keys to remove
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    And if you need to catch errors where you pop a value that isn't in the dictionary, use lambda inside map() like this:



    map(lambda x: myDict.pop(x,None), ['a','c','e'])
    [1, 3, None] # pop returns
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    It works. And 'e' did not cause an error, even though myDict did not have an 'e' key.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 30




      This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
      – Greg Krimer
      Nov 7 '15 at 16:31






    • 2




      Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
      – Michael Ekoka
      Oct 22 '17 at 8:48















    up vote
    24
    down vote













    If you need to remove a lot of keys from a dictionary in one line of code, I think using map() is quite succinct and Pythonic readable:



    myDict = {'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4}
    map(myDict.pop, ['a','c']) # The list of keys to remove
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    And if you need to catch errors where you pop a value that isn't in the dictionary, use lambda inside map() like this:



    map(lambda x: myDict.pop(x,None), ['a','c','e'])
    [1, 3, None] # pop returns
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    It works. And 'e' did not cause an error, even though myDict did not have an 'e' key.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 30




      This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
      – Greg Krimer
      Nov 7 '15 at 16:31






    • 2




      Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
      – Michael Ekoka
      Oct 22 '17 at 8:48













    up vote
    24
    down vote










    up vote
    24
    down vote









    If you need to remove a lot of keys from a dictionary in one line of code, I think using map() is quite succinct and Pythonic readable:



    myDict = {'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4}
    map(myDict.pop, ['a','c']) # The list of keys to remove
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    And if you need to catch errors where you pop a value that isn't in the dictionary, use lambda inside map() like this:



    map(lambda x: myDict.pop(x,None), ['a','c','e'])
    [1, 3, None] # pop returns
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    It works. And 'e' did not cause an error, even though myDict did not have an 'e' key.






    share|improve this answer














    If you need to remove a lot of keys from a dictionary in one line of code, I think using map() is quite succinct and Pythonic readable:



    myDict = {'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4}
    map(myDict.pop, ['a','c']) # The list of keys to remove
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    And if you need to catch errors where you pop a value that isn't in the dictionary, use lambda inside map() like this:



    map(lambda x: myDict.pop(x,None), ['a','c','e'])
    [1, 3, None] # pop returns
    >>> myDict
    {'b': 2, 'd': 4}


    It works. And 'e' did not cause an error, even though myDict did not have an 'e' key.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 29 at 13:53









    Peter Mortensen

    13.4k1983111




    13.4k1983111










    answered Sep 16 '15 at 19:17









    Marc Maxson

    81711326




    81711326








    • 30




      This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
      – Greg Krimer
      Nov 7 '15 at 16:31






    • 2




      Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
      – Michael Ekoka
      Oct 22 '17 at 8:48














    • 30




      This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
      – Greg Krimer
      Nov 7 '15 at 16:31






    • 2




      Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
      – Michael Ekoka
      Oct 22 '17 at 8:48








    30




    30




    This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
    – Greg Krimer
    Nov 7 '15 at 16:31




    This will not work in Python 3 because map and friends are now lazy and return iterators. Using map for side-effects is generally considered poor practice; a standard for ... in loop would be better. See Views And Iterators Instead Of Lists for more information.
    – Greg Krimer
    Nov 7 '15 at 16:31




    2




    2




    Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
    – Michael Ekoka
    Oct 22 '17 at 8:48




    Regardless of taste and practice style, list comprehensions should still work in Py3 [myDict.pop(i, None) for i in ['a', 'c']], as they offer a general alternative to map (and filter).
    – Michael Ekoka
    Oct 22 '17 at 8:48










    up vote
    16
    down vote













    Use:



    >>> if myDict.get(key): myDict.pop(key)


    Another way:



    >>> {k:v for k, v in myDict.items() if k != 'key'}


    You can delete by conditions. No error if key doesn't exist.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2




      dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
      – Artyer
      Jun 29 '17 at 15:53










    • I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
      – Matthias Herrmann
      Sep 12 '17 at 17:21















    up vote
    16
    down vote













    Use:



    >>> if myDict.get(key): myDict.pop(key)


    Another way:



    >>> {k:v for k, v in myDict.items() if k != 'key'}


    You can delete by conditions. No error if key doesn't exist.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2




      dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
      – Artyer
      Jun 29 '17 at 15:53










    • I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
      – Matthias Herrmann
      Sep 12 '17 at 17:21













    up vote
    16
    down vote










    up vote
    16
    down vote









    Use:



    >>> if myDict.get(key): myDict.pop(key)


    Another way:



    >>> {k:v for k, v in myDict.items() if k != 'key'}


    You can delete by conditions. No error if key doesn't exist.






    share|improve this answer














    Use:



    >>> if myDict.get(key): myDict.pop(key)


    Another way:



    >>> {k:v for k, v in myDict.items() if k != 'key'}


    You can delete by conditions. No error if key doesn't exist.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 29 at 13:54









    Peter Mortensen

    13.4k1983111




    13.4k1983111










    answered Dec 7 '16 at 5:52









    Shameem

    929614




    929614








    • 2




      dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
      – Artyer
      Jun 29 '17 at 15:53










    • I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
      – Matthias Herrmann
      Sep 12 '17 at 17:21














    • 2




      dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
      – Artyer
      Jun 29 '17 at 15:53










    • I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
      – Matthias Herrmann
      Sep 12 '17 at 17:21








    2




    2




    dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
    – Artyer
    Jun 29 '17 at 15:53




    dict.has_key was removed in Python 3, and instead, you should use in (key in myDict). You should do this in Python 2 as well.
    – Artyer
    Jun 29 '17 at 15:53












    I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
    – Matthias Herrmann
    Sep 12 '17 at 17:21




    I especially like the way using dictionary comprehension
    – Matthias Herrmann
    Sep 12 '17 at 17:21










    up vote
    8
    down vote













    Using the "del" keyword:



    del dict[key]





    share|improve this answer























    • Neat solution for deleting key in dict
      – Ajay Kumar
      May 8 at 9:54















    up vote
    8
    down vote













    Using the "del" keyword:



    del dict[key]





    share|improve this answer























    • Neat solution for deleting key in dict
      – Ajay Kumar
      May 8 at 9:54













    up vote
    8
    down vote










    up vote
    8
    down vote









    Using the "del" keyword:



    del dict[key]





    share|improve this answer














    Using the "del" keyword:



    del dict[key]






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 29 at 13:55









    Peter Mortensen

    13.4k1983111




    13.4k1983111










    answered May 2 at 10:22









    Sarthak Gupta

    286314




    286314












    • Neat solution for deleting key in dict
      – Ajay Kumar
      May 8 at 9:54


















    • Neat solution for deleting key in dict
      – Ajay Kumar
      May 8 at 9:54
















    Neat solution for deleting key in dict
    – Ajay Kumar
    May 8 at 9:54




    Neat solution for deleting key in dict
    – Ajay Kumar
    May 8 at 9:54










    up vote
    5
    down vote













    We can delete a key from a Python dictionary by the some following approaches.



    Using the del keyword; it's almost the same approach like you did though -



     myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300 }
    print(myDict) # {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
    if myDict.get('one') : del myDict['one']
    print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


    Or



    We can do like following:



    But one should keep in mind that, in this process actually it won't delete any key from the dictionary rather than making specific key excluded from that dictionary. In addition, I observed that it returned a dictionary which was not ordered the same as myDict.



    myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}
    {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


    If we run it in the shell, it'll execute something like {'five': 500, 'four': 400, 'three': 300, 'two': 200} - notice that it's not the same ordered as myDict. Again if we try to print myDict, then we can see all keys including which we excluded from the dictionary by this approach. However, we can make a new dictionary by assigning the following statement into a variable:



    var = {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


    Now if we try to print it, then it'll follow the parent order:



    print(var) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}


    Or



    Using the pop() method.



    myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
    print(myDict)

    if myDict.get('one') : myDict.pop('one')
    print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


    The difference between del and pop is that, using pop() method, we can actually store the key's value if needed, like the following:



    myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
    if myDict.get('one') : var = myDict.pop('one')
    print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}
    print(var) # 100


    Fork this gist for future reference, if you find this useful.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      We can delete a key from a Python dictionary by the some following approaches.



      Using the del keyword; it's almost the same approach like you did though -



       myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300 }
      print(myDict) # {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
      if myDict.get('one') : del myDict['one']
      print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


      Or



      We can do like following:



      But one should keep in mind that, in this process actually it won't delete any key from the dictionary rather than making specific key excluded from that dictionary. In addition, I observed that it returned a dictionary which was not ordered the same as myDict.



      myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}
      {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


      If we run it in the shell, it'll execute something like {'five': 500, 'four': 400, 'three': 300, 'two': 200} - notice that it's not the same ordered as myDict. Again if we try to print myDict, then we can see all keys including which we excluded from the dictionary by this approach. However, we can make a new dictionary by assigning the following statement into a variable:



      var = {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


      Now if we try to print it, then it'll follow the parent order:



      print(var) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}


      Or



      Using the pop() method.



      myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
      print(myDict)

      if myDict.get('one') : myDict.pop('one')
      print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


      The difference between del and pop is that, using pop() method, we can actually store the key's value if needed, like the following:



      myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
      if myDict.get('one') : var = myDict.pop('one')
      print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}
      print(var) # 100


      Fork this gist for future reference, if you find this useful.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        We can delete a key from a Python dictionary by the some following approaches.



        Using the del keyword; it's almost the same approach like you did though -



         myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300 }
        print(myDict) # {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        if myDict.get('one') : del myDict['one']
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


        Or



        We can do like following:



        But one should keep in mind that, in this process actually it won't delete any key from the dictionary rather than making specific key excluded from that dictionary. In addition, I observed that it returned a dictionary which was not ordered the same as myDict.



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}
        {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


        If we run it in the shell, it'll execute something like {'five': 500, 'four': 400, 'three': 300, 'two': 200} - notice that it's not the same ordered as myDict. Again if we try to print myDict, then we can see all keys including which we excluded from the dictionary by this approach. However, we can make a new dictionary by assigning the following statement into a variable:



        var = {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


        Now if we try to print it, then it'll follow the parent order:



        print(var) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}


        Or



        Using the pop() method.



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        print(myDict)

        if myDict.get('one') : myDict.pop('one')
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


        The difference between del and pop is that, using pop() method, we can actually store the key's value if needed, like the following:



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        if myDict.get('one') : var = myDict.pop('one')
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        print(var) # 100


        Fork this gist for future reference, if you find this useful.






        share|improve this answer














        We can delete a key from a Python dictionary by the some following approaches.



        Using the del keyword; it's almost the same approach like you did though -



         myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300 }
        print(myDict) # {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        if myDict.get('one') : del myDict['one']
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


        Or



        We can do like following:



        But one should keep in mind that, in this process actually it won't delete any key from the dictionary rather than making specific key excluded from that dictionary. In addition, I observed that it returned a dictionary which was not ordered the same as myDict.



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}
        {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


        If we run it in the shell, it'll execute something like {'five': 500, 'four': 400, 'three': 300, 'two': 200} - notice that it's not the same ordered as myDict. Again if we try to print myDict, then we can see all keys including which we excluded from the dictionary by this approach. However, we can make a new dictionary by assigning the following statement into a variable:



        var = {key:value for key, value in myDict.items() if key != 'one'}


        Now if we try to print it, then it'll follow the parent order:



        print(var) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300, 'four': 400, 'five': 500}


        Or



        Using the pop() method.



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        print(myDict)

        if myDict.get('one') : myDict.pop('one')
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}


        The difference between del and pop is that, using pop() method, we can actually store the key's value if needed, like the following:



        myDict = {'one': 100, 'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        if myDict.get('one') : var = myDict.pop('one')
        print(myDict) # {'two': 200, 'three': 300}
        print(var) # 100


        Fork this gist for future reference, if you find this useful.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 11 at 23:02

























        answered May 19 at 10:09









        iPython

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11277432%2fhow-to-remove-a-key-from-a-python-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Florida Star v. B. J. F.

            Danny Elfman

            Retrieve a Users Dashboard in Tumblr with R and TumblR. Oauth Issues