Passing variable arguments to a java function from javascript using GraalVM
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am trying to call a function available in Corda RPC called startTrackedFlowDynamic
which accepts 2 arguments:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(logicType: Class<out FlowLogic<T>>, vararg args: Any?)
which is packaged in a JAR
The call to this function is made from a Javascript context (using GraalVM to achieve that), I want to call this function and pass the arguments to it obtained from a request object (say, coming from a REST API)
Example:
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorA, iouValue]
,
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorA, iouValue)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorB, abc, xyz]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorB, abc, xyz)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorC]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorC)
TLDR: I would like to make it as a generic API instead of re-writing for every different Flow call.
I want to be able to pass dynamic number of arguments coming from the request object to this function instead of hard coding a fixed number of arguments and having to update it when the number of argument changes
An example of the behaviour I want to replicate:
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
Any suggestions?
javascript java node.js corda graalvm
add a comment |
I am trying to call a function available in Corda RPC called startTrackedFlowDynamic
which accepts 2 arguments:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(logicType: Class<out FlowLogic<T>>, vararg args: Any?)
which is packaged in a JAR
The call to this function is made from a Javascript context (using GraalVM to achieve that), I want to call this function and pass the arguments to it obtained from a request object (say, coming from a REST API)
Example:
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorA, iouValue]
,
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorA, iouValue)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorB, abc, xyz]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorB, abc, xyz)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorC]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorC)
TLDR: I would like to make it as a generic API instead of re-writing for every different Flow call.
I want to be able to pass dynamic number of arguments coming from the request object to this function instead of hard coding a fixed number of arguments and having to update it when the number of argument changes
An example of the behaviour I want to replicate:
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
Any suggestions?
javascript java node.js corda graalvm
I'd suggest using in exampleconsole.log
instead ofalert
- it's less annoying
– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
add a comment |
I am trying to call a function available in Corda RPC called startTrackedFlowDynamic
which accepts 2 arguments:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(logicType: Class<out FlowLogic<T>>, vararg args: Any?)
which is packaged in a JAR
The call to this function is made from a Javascript context (using GraalVM to achieve that), I want to call this function and pass the arguments to it obtained from a request object (say, coming from a REST API)
Example:
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorA, iouValue]
,
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorA, iouValue)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorB, abc, xyz]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorB, abc, xyz)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorC]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorC)
TLDR: I would like to make it as a generic API instead of re-writing for every different Flow call.
I want to be able to pass dynamic number of arguments coming from the request object to this function instead of hard coding a fixed number of arguments and having to update it when the number of argument changes
An example of the behaviour I want to replicate:
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
Any suggestions?
javascript java node.js corda graalvm
I am trying to call a function available in Corda RPC called startTrackedFlowDynamic
which accepts 2 arguments:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(logicType: Class<out FlowLogic<T>>, vararg args: Any?)
which is packaged in a JAR
The call to this function is made from a Javascript context (using GraalVM to achieve that), I want to call this function and pass the arguments to it obtained from a request object (say, coming from a REST API)
Example:
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorA, iouValue]
,
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorA, iouValue)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorB, abc, xyz]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorB, abc, xyz)
if the request contains an array [::InitiatorC]
I would want to call startTrackedFlowDynamic like:
startTrackedFlowDynamic(::InitiatorC)
TLDR: I would like to make it as a generic API instead of re-writing for every different Flow call.
I want to be able to pass dynamic number of arguments coming from the request object to this function instead of hard coding a fixed number of arguments and having to update it when the number of argument changes
An example of the behaviour I want to replicate:
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
Any suggestions?
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
var func = function () {
console.log(arguments.length);
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
}
};
func.apply(null, ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz'])
javascript java node.js corda graalvm
javascript java node.js corda graalvm
edited Nov 16 '18 at 15:28
Clyde D'Cruz
1,358930
1,358930
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:16
PoojaKamatPoojaKamat
315
315
I'd suggest using in exampleconsole.log
instead ofalert
- it's less annoying
– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
add a comment |
I'd suggest using in exampleconsole.log
instead ofalert
- it's less annoying
– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
I'd suggest using in example
console.log
instead of alert
- it's less annoying– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
I'd suggest using in example
console.log
instead of alert
- it's less annoying– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It seems to work with the following JavaScript syntax
var argsArray = ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz']
startTrackedFlowDynamic(...argsArray)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337746%2fpassing-variable-arguments-to-a-java-function-from-javascript-using-graalvm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It seems to work with the following JavaScript syntax
var argsArray = ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz']
startTrackedFlowDynamic(...argsArray)
add a comment |
It seems to work with the following JavaScript syntax
var argsArray = ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz']
startTrackedFlowDynamic(...argsArray)
add a comment |
It seems to work with the following JavaScript syntax
var argsArray = ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz']
startTrackedFlowDynamic(...argsArray)
It seems to work with the following JavaScript syntax
var argsArray = ['::InitiatorA', 'abc', 'xyz']
startTrackedFlowDynamic(...argsArray)
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:32
PoojaKamatPoojaKamat
315
315
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337746%2fpassing-variable-arguments-to-a-java-function-from-javascript-using-graalvm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'd suggest using in example
console.log
instead ofalert
- it's less annoying– barbsan
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44