Man-portable air-defense system




Shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile weapons



A Soviet SA-7 in use.


Man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS or MPADS) are shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles (SLSAMs). They are typically guided weapons and are a threat to low-flying aircraft, especially helicopters.




Contents






  • 1 Overview


  • 2 Missile types


    • 2.1 Unguided


    • 2.2 Infrared


      • 2.2.1 First generation


      • 2.2.2 Second generation


      • 2.2.3 Third generation


      • 2.2.4 Fourth generation




    • 2.3 Command line-of-sight


    • 2.4 Laser guided




  • 3 Notable uses


    • 3.1 Against military aircraft


    • 3.2 Against civilian aircraft




  • 4 Countermeasures


    • 4.1 Military


    • 4.2 Civilian




  • 5 Weapons by country


    • 5.1 Black market




  • 6 See also


  • 7 References


  • 8 External links





Overview


MANPADS were developed in the 1940s to provide military ground forces with protection from enemy aircraft. They have received a great deal of attention, partly because armed groups have used them against commercial airliners. These missiles, affordable and widely available through a variety of sources, have been used successfully over the past three decades both in military conflicts, as well as by terrorist organizations.[1]


Twenty-five countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States, Sweden and Russia produce man-portable air defense systems.[2][3] Possession, export, and trafficking in such weapons is officially tightly controlled, due to the threat they pose to civil aviation, although such efforts have not always been successful.[4][5]


The missiles are about 1.5 to 1.8 m (5 to 6 ft) in length and weigh about 17 to 18 kg (37 to 40 lb), depending on the model. Shoulder-fired SAMs generally have a target detection range of about 10 km (6 mi) and an engagement range of about 6 km (4 mi), so aircraft flying at 6,100 metres (20,000 ft) or higher are relatively safe.[6] However, the FIM-92 Stinger (1996 version) has a range of 26,000 feet (7,900 m).[7]


The acronym MANPADS is commonly mistaken to have a singular form of "MANPAD"—this is incorrect, as even a singular unit is still a system and would have the final S in the acronym.



Missile types




The German Fliegerfaust




An FIM-43C Redeye missile just after launch, before the sustainer motor ignites




An SA-18 (Igla) missile with launch tube and grip stick (top) and an SA-16 (Igla-1) missile and launch tube (bottom)




JASDF soldiers aiming a Type 91 Kai MANPADS at a mock airborne target in the Pacific Alaskan Range Complex as part of Red Flag – Alaska.




A Starstreak SAM fired from a M1097 AN/TWQ-1 Avenger Air Defense platform.



Unguided


Borrowing from the concept of the simple and effective anti-tank Panzerfaust, the Fliegerfaust, an unguided multibarreled 20mm rocket launcher, was developed by Nazi Germany in 1944. The weapon never reached mass production due to the end of World War II.


Following World War II, Soviet designers also experimented with unguided multibarreled rocket launchers[8] but this design concept was abandoned in favor of guided missiles equipped with an infrared sensor.



Infrared



Infrared shoulder-fired missiles are designed to home-in on a heat source on an aircraft, typically the engine exhaust plume, and detonate a warhead in or near the heat source to disable the aircraft. These missiles use passive guidance, meaning that they do not emit signals to detect a heat source, which makes them difficult to detect by targeted aircraft employing countermeasure systems.[9]



First generation


The first missiles deployed in the 1960s were infrared missiles. First generation shoulder-fired SAMs, such as the U.S. Redeye, early versions of the Soviet 9K32 Strela-2, and the Chinese HN-5 (copy of Soviet Strela-2), are considered "tail-chase weapons" as their seekers can only acquire and engage a high performance aircraft after it has passed the missile's firing position. In this flight profile, the aircraft's engines are fully exposed to the missile's seeker and provide a sufficient thermal signature for engagement. First generation IR missiles are also highly susceptible to interfering thermal signatures from background sources, including the sun, which many experts feel makes them somewhat unreliable.[10]



Second generation


Second generation infrared missiles, such as early versions of the U.S. Stinger, the Soviet SA-14, and the Chinese FN-6, use improved coolants to cool the seeker head, which enables the seeker to filter out most interfering background IR sources as well as permitting head-on and side engagement profiles. These missiles may also employ technologies to counter decoy flares that might be deployed by targeted aircraft and also have backup target detection modes such as the ultraviolet (UV) mode found on the Stinger missile.[6][10]



Third generation


Third generation infrared shoulder-fired SAMs, such as the French Mistral, the Soviet 9K38 Igla, and the U.S. Stinger B, use single or multiple detectors to produce a quasi-image of the target and also have the ability to recognize and reject flares dispensed from aircraft.[6][10]



Fourth generation


Fourth generation missiles, such as the cancelled American FIM-92 Stinger Block 2, Russian SA-25, and missiles believed to be under development in Japan, France, and Israel could incorporate focal plane array guidance systems and other advanced sensor systems, which will permit engagement at greater ranges.[11]


Russian 9K333 Verba is a finished fourth-generation MANPADS with three-channel optical guidance (ultraviolet, near-infrared, mid-infrared).[12]



Command line-of-sight



Command guidance (CLOS) missiles do not home in on a particular aspect (heat source or radio or radar transmissions) of the targeted aircraft. Instead, the missile operator or gunner visually acquires the target using a magnified optical sight and then uses radio controls to "fly" the missile into the aircraft. One of the benefits of such a missile is that it is virtually immune to flares and other basic countermeasure systems that are designed primarily to defeat IR missiles. The major drawback of CLOS missiles is that they require highly trained and skilled operators. Numerous reports from the Soviet–Afghan War in the 1980s cite Afghan mujahedin as being disappointed with the British-supplied Blowpipe CLOS missile because it was too difficult to learn to use and highly inaccurate, particularly when employed against fast moving jet aircraft.[13] Given these considerations, many experts believe that CLOS missiles are not as ideally suited for untrained personnel use as are IR missiles, which sometimes are referred to as "fire and forget" missiles.[14]


Later versions of CLOS missiles, such as the British Javelin, use a solid state television camera in lieu of the optical tracker to make the gunner's task easier. The Javelin's manufacturer, Thales Air Defence, claims that their missile is virtually impervious to countermeasures.[15] Even more advanced CLOS versions, such as the British Starburst, use a laser data link in lieu of earlier radio guidance links to fly the missile to the target.[16]



Laser guided



Laser guided shoulder-fired SAMs use lasers to guide the missiles to the target. The missile homes in on the reflection of the laser beam from the aircraft and strikes the aircraft where the missile operator or gunner aims the laser. Missiles such as Sweden's RBS-70 and Britain's Starstreak can engage aircraft from all angles and only require the operator to continuously track the target using a joystick to keep the laser aim point on the target. Because there are no data links from the ground to the missile, the missile cannot be effectively jammed after it is launched. This technique is known as beam riding. Even though laser guided missiles require relatively extensive training and skill to operate, many experts consider these missiles particularly menacing due to the missiles' resistance to most conventional countermeasures in use today.[16][17] However, laser guidance only works under good weather conditions, as opposed to radar/satellite guidance for example.



Notable uses



Against military aircraft



  • List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan

  • Argentine air forces in the Falklands War

  • British air services in the Falklands War

  • On 27 February 1991, during Operation Desert Storm, an USAF F-16 was shot down by an Igla-1.[18] Russian sources also report about the loss of many military aircraft shot down by the Igla.[citation needed]

  • On 16 April 1994, during Operation Deny Flight a Sea Harrier of the 801 Naval Air Squadron of the Royal Navy, operating from the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal, was brought down by a Igla-1[19]

  • On 30 August 1995, during Operation Deliberate Force, a French Air Force Mirage 2000D was shot down over Bosnia by a heat-seeking 9K38 Igla missile fired by air defense units of Army of Republika Srpska, prompting efforts to obtain improved defensive systems.[20]

  • On 27 May 1999, the Anza Mk-II was used to attack Indian aircraft during the Kargil conflict with India. A MiG-27 of the Indian Air Force was shot down by Pakistan Army Air Defence forces.[21]

  • List of Russian aircraft losses in the Second Chechen War

  • List of Coalition aircraft crashes in Afghanistan

  • List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War


  • 2002 Khankala Mi-26 crash: On 19 August 2002, a Russian-made Igla shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile hit an overloaded Mil Mi-26 helicopter, causing it to crash into a minefield at the main military base at Khankala near the capital city of Grozny, Chechnya. 127 Russian troops and crew were killed.

  • In the 2008 South Ossetia War, Polish made Grom MANPADS were used by Georgia


  • Syrian Civil War
    • On 3 February 2018, a Russian Sukhoi Su-25 was shot down by a MANPADS over rebel-held territory while conducting airstrikes over Syria's northwestern city of Saraqib. The pilot, Major Roman Filipov, ejected but was surrounded by multiple rebel soldiers, of which he shot two and then killed himself, along with multiple insurgents, with a grenade.[22]



  • War in Donbass[23]



Against civilian aircraft



  • The 1978 Air Rhodesia Viscount Shootdown is the first example of a civilian airliner shot down by a man-portable surface-to-air missile. The pilot of the aircraft managed to make a controlled crash landing.


  • Air Rhodesia Flight 827 was also shot down in February 1979 by the Zimbabwe People's Revolutionary Army armed with a Strela 2 missile. All 59 passengers and crew were killed.


  • 1993 Transair Georgian Airline shootdowns involved two separate aircraft shot down a day apart in Sukhumi, Abkhazia, Georgia, killing 108 people.[24]

  • On 6 April 1994, a surface-to-air missile struck one of the wings of the Dassault Falcon 50 carrying three French crew and nine passengers, including Rwandan president Juvénal Habyarimana and Burundian president Cyprien Ntaryamira, as it prepared to land in Kigali, Rwanda, before a second missile hit its tail. The plane erupted into flames in mid-air before crashing into the garden of the presidential palace, exploding on impact. This incident was the ignition spark of the Rwandan Genocide.


  • 1998 Lionair Flight LN 602 shootdown: On 7 October 1998, the Tamil Tigers shot down an aircraft off the coast of Sri Lanka.


  • 2002 Mombasa airliner attack: On 28 November 2002, two shoulder-launched Strela 2 (SA-7) surface-to-air missiles were fired at a chartered Boeing 757 airliner as it took off from Moi International Airport. The missiles missed the aircraft which continued safely to Tel Aviv, carrying 271 vacationers from Mombasa back to Israel. In the photos, the missile systems were painted in light blue, the color used in the Soviet military for training material (a training SA-7 round would not have the guidance system).


  • 2003 Baghdad DHL shootdown incident: On 22 November 2003, an Airbus A300B4-203F cargo plane, operating on behalf of DHL was hit by an SA-14 missile, which resulted in the loss of its hydraulic systems. The crew later landed the crippled aircraft safely by using only differential engine thrust by adjusting the individual throttle controls of each engine.


  • 2007 Mogadishu TransAVIAexport Airlines Il-76 crash: On 23 March 2007, a TransAVIAexport Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 airplane crashed in outskirts of Mogadishu, Somalia, during the 2007 Battle of Mogadishu. Witnesses claim that a surface-to-air missile was fired immediately prior to the accident. However, Somali officials deny that the aircraft was shot down.



Countermeasures




A 9K38 Igla (NATO reporting name: SA-18) dual missile launch platform mounted on a Mercedes-Benz Unimog of the Mexican Navy in a Mexican military parade.


Man-portable air defense systems are a popular black market item for insurgent forces.[25] Their proliferation became the subject of the Wassenaar Arrangement's (WA)22 Elements for Export Controls of MANPADS, the G8 Action Plan of 2 June 2003,[26] the October 2003 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit, Bangkok Declaration on Partnership for the Future and in July 2003 the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Forum for Security Co-operation, Decision No. 7/03: Man-portable Air Defense Systems.[27]


Understanding the problem in 2003, Colin Powell remarked that there was "no threat more serious to aviation" than the missiles,[28] which can be used to shoot down helicopters and commercial airliners, and are sold illegally for as little as a few hundred dollars. The U.S. has led a global effort to dismantle these weapons, with over 30,000 voluntarily destroyed since 2003, but probably hundreds of thousands are still in the hands of insurgents, especially in Iraq, where they were looted from the military arsenals of the former dictator Saddam Hussein,[29][30] and in Afghanistan as well. In August 2010, a report by the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) confirmed that "only a handful" of illicit MANPADS were recovered from national resistance caches in Iraq in 2009, according to media reports and interviews with military sources.[31]



Military


With the growing number of MANPADS attacks on civilian airliners, a number of different countermeasure systems have been developed specifically to protect aircraft against the missiles.[citation needed]




  • AN/ALQ-144, AN/ALQ-147 and AN/ALQ-157 are U.S.-produced systems, developed by Sanders Associates in the 1970s.


  • AN/ALQ-212 ATIRCM, AN/AAQ-24 Nemesis are NATO systems developed by BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman respectively.



Civilian




  • Civil Aircraft Missile Protection System (CAMPS)—Developed by Saab Avitronics, Chemring Countermeasures and Naturelink Aviation, using non-pyrotechnic infrared decoys.


  • Flight Guard by Elta Systems Ltd.



Weapons by country




HS M09 hybrid air-defense system on BOV-3 vehicle with 8 × Strela 2




  • China

    • HN-5

    • HN-6

    • QW-1

    • QW-11

    • QW-11G

    • QW-1A

    • QW-1M

    • QW-2

    • QW-3

    • FN-6

    • QW-1 Vanguard

    • TB-1




  • France
    • Mistral



  • United Kingdom

    • Blowpipe

    • Javelin

    • Starburst

    • Starstreak




  • Iran

    • Misagh-1

    • Misagh-2

    • Misagh-3


    • Qaem[32][33]




  • Japan
    • Type 91 (SAM-2, SAM-2B)



  • Pakistan

    • Anza (missile)

    • Anza Mk-I (missile)

    • Anza Mk-II (missile)

    • Anza Mk-III (missile)




  • Poland
    • Grom



  • Soviet Union/Russian Federation

    • 9K32M 'Strela-2' (SA-7)

    • 9K36 'Strela-3' (SA-14)

    • 9K310 'Igla-M' (SA-16)

    • 9K38 'Igla' (SA-18)

    • 9K338 ' Igla-S' (SA-24)


    • Verba (Willow) MANPADS[34] (GRAU – 9K333 missile – 9M336, SA-25).




  • Sweden
    • RBS 70



  • United States

    • FIM-43 'Redeye'

    • FIM-92 'Stinger'




  • South Korea
    • Chiron (missile)



  • North Korea

    • HT-16PGJ[35]




Black market


Although most MANPADs are owned and accounted for by governments, political upheavals and corruption have allowed thousands of them to enter the black market. In the years 1998-2018, at least 72 non-state groups have fielded MANPADs.[36]



See also



  • Anti-aircraft warfare

  • Infrared countermeasure

  • Aerial countermeasures

  • Civil Aircraft Missile Protection System

  • Flight Guard

  • Northrop Grumman Guardian

  • Man-portable anti-tank systems



References


Portions of this article were taken from Homeland Security: Protecting Airliners from Terrorist Missiles, CRS Report for Congress RL31741, February 16, 2006 by the Congressional Research Service, division of The Library of Congress which as a work of the Federal Government exists in the public domain.





  1. ^ Footnote 1 in original source (CRS RL31741): "Shoulder-fired SAMs have been used effectively in a variety of conflicts ranging from the Arab-Israeli Wars, Vietnam, the Iran-Iraq War, to the Falklands Conflict, as well as conflicts in Nicaragua, Yemen, Angola, and Uganda, the Chad-Libya Conflict, and the Balkans Conflict in the 1990s. Some analysts claim that Afghan mujahedin downed 269 Soviet aircraft using 340 shoulder-fired SAMs during the Soviet-Afghan War and that 12 of 29 Allied aircraft shot down during the 1991 Gulf War were downed by MANPADS."


  2. ^ CRS RL31741 page 1


  3. ^ Wade Bose, "Wassenaar Agreement Agrees on MANPADS Export Criteria", Arms Control Today, January/February 2001, p. 1., quoted in CRS RL31741


  4. ^ "MANPADS Proliferation - FAS". Fas.org..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  5. ^ "Defence & Security Intelligence & Analysis - Jane's 360". Janes.com.


  6. ^ abc Marvin B. Schaffer, "Concerns About Terrorists With Manportable SAMS", RAND Corporation Reports, October 1993, quoted in CRS RL31741


  7. ^ "Raytheon FIM-92 Stinger". Designation-systems.net. 2005-02-14. Retrieved 2017-04-09.


  8. ^ Luckyanov, Alex. "Оружейный двор". Deol.ru.


  9. ^ CRS RL31741 page 1-2


  10. ^ abc CRS RL31741 page 2


  11. ^ "Raytheon Electronic Systems FIM-92 Stinger Low-Altitude Surface-to-Air Missile System Family", Jane's Defence, October 13, 2000, quoted in CRS RL31741


  12. ^ joffrey. "All Russian airborne troops equipped Verba Manpads 82707173 - July 2017 Global Defense Security news industry - Defense Security global news industry army 2017 - Archive News year". Armyrecognition.com.


  13. ^ Timothy Gusinov, "Portable Weapons May Become the Next Weapon of Choice for Terrorists", Washington Diplomat, January 2003, p. 2., quoted in CRS RL31741


  14. ^ CRS RL31741 page 2-3


  15. ^ "Land-Based Air Defence 2003-2004", Jane's, 2003, p. 37., quoted in CRS RL31741


  16. ^ ab CRS RL31741 page 3


  17. ^ Richardson, Mark, and Al-Jaberi, Mubarak, "The vulnerability of laser warning systems against guided weapons based on low power lasers", Cranfield University, April 28, 2006


  18. ^ "Airframe Details for F-16 #84-1390". F-16.net. Retrieved 2017-04-09.


  19. ^ "UK: Igla missile's potent force". BBC News. 2003-08-13. Retrieved 2017-04-09.


  20. ^ Cohen, Roger (11 December 1995). "French Deadline Passes With No Word From Serbs on Pilots". The New York Times.


  21. ^ John Pike (1999-03-21). "SA-7 Grail". FAS. Retrieved 2009-02-09.


  22. ^ "Russian fighter jet shot down in Syria's Idlib province". BBC. 3 February 2018.


  23. ^ de Larrinaga, Nicholas (3 May 2014). "Two Ukrainian Mi-24s shot down by MANPADS". IHS Jane's Defence Weekly.


  24. ^ Northrop Grumman fact sheet Archived 2007-10-30 at the Wayback Machine


  25. ^ "MANPADS at a Glance", Arms control.


  26. ^ G-8 to Take Further Steps to Enhance Transportation Security, Federation of American Scientists.


  27. ^ Man-Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) Proliferation, FAS.


  28. ^ "Countering the MANPADS threat: strategies for success (man-portable air defense systems)", Access my library.


  29. ^ Jehl, Douglas; Sanger, David E. (6 November 2004). "U.S. Expands List of Lost Missiles". Nytimes.com.


  30. ^ ""Iraq's Looted Arms Depots: What the GAO Didn't Mention"". Fas.org.


  31. ^ "Where Have All the MANPADS Gone?". Wired.com.


  32. ^ "Iranian TOW Missile Knockoffs Spread to War Zones". Warisboring.com.


  33. ^ "How Iran's Revived Weapons Exports Could Boost Its Proxies". Washingtoninstitute.org.


  34. ^ "Зенитчики начали использовать новейшие переносные зенитно-ракетные комплексы "Верба"" [Anti-aircraft gunners started using the newest portable air defense missile complexes "Verba"] (in Russian). Rusdialog. 2014-11-09. Retrieved 2017-04-09.


  35. ^ Oryx (11 March 2016). "Oryx Blog: North Korean HT-16PGJ MANPADS in Syria". Spioenkop.blogspot.com.


  36. ^ [1][dead link]




External links








  • MANPADS Proliferation—links to hundreds of documents on MANPADS, their proliferation, and control efforts


  • Man-Portable Air Defence Systems (MANPADS) Small Arms Survey Research Note

  • Man Portable Missiles vs Airliners


  • Are Helicopters Vulnerable?—Analysis of MANPADS effectiveness.


  • Man Portable AIr Defense System—GlobalSecurity.Org article covering period until 1999.

  • MANPADS: Combating the Threat to Global Aviation from Man-Portable Air Defense Systems




Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Lugert, Oklahoma