ASP.NET Core can't step into endpoint method?
I have an API controller with a method like so:
[HttpGet]
[Route("~/api/groups/{groupId}/feeds/{feedItemId}/flag")]
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
public async Task<IActionResult> FlagFeedItem([FromRoute] int groupId, [FromRoute] long feedItemId)
{
try
{
await _feedManagementService.FlagMessage(groupId, feedItemId);
return Ok();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "FlagFeedItem(int)");
return new OopsResult(ex);
}
}
I put breakpoints on the await
line and on the _logger
line. I then use my REST client to hit the specified endpoint (http://myhost/api/groups/1/feeds/1/flag) in debug mode.
I immediately get back a blank 200 response... but the await method is never hit, nor is the service underneath, and I never reach the breakpoint(s). I'm scratching my head on this. I would think this was a thread deadlocking issue but for the fact that it actually returns a 200 status code.
What could be the problem here? The routing appears to be correct, I can intercept on the controller's constructor, all looks fine... but when it gets here, the system just decides it doesn't actually need to do anything.
BTW, the FeedItemAccess
filter just checks the user's tenancy rights to connect to the endpoint; it also appears to be working fine (I can intercept on that too and it's leaving the filter under success conditions).
c# asp.net-core asp.net-core-webapi
|
show 3 more comments
I have an API controller with a method like so:
[HttpGet]
[Route("~/api/groups/{groupId}/feeds/{feedItemId}/flag")]
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
public async Task<IActionResult> FlagFeedItem([FromRoute] int groupId, [FromRoute] long feedItemId)
{
try
{
await _feedManagementService.FlagMessage(groupId, feedItemId);
return Ok();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "FlagFeedItem(int)");
return new OopsResult(ex);
}
}
I put breakpoints on the await
line and on the _logger
line. I then use my REST client to hit the specified endpoint (http://myhost/api/groups/1/feeds/1/flag) in debug mode.
I immediately get back a blank 200 response... but the await method is never hit, nor is the service underneath, and I never reach the breakpoint(s). I'm scratching my head on this. I would think this was a thread deadlocking issue but for the fact that it actually returns a 200 status code.
What could be the problem here? The routing appears to be correct, I can intercept on the controller's constructor, all looks fine... but when it gets here, the system just decides it doesn't actually need to do anything.
BTW, the FeedItemAccess
filter just checks the user's tenancy rights to connect to the endpoint; it also appears to be working fine (I can intercept on that too and it's leaving the filter under success conditions).
c# asp.net-core asp.net-core-webapi
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
What happens if you comment out[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
2
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13
|
show 3 more comments
I have an API controller with a method like so:
[HttpGet]
[Route("~/api/groups/{groupId}/feeds/{feedItemId}/flag")]
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
public async Task<IActionResult> FlagFeedItem([FromRoute] int groupId, [FromRoute] long feedItemId)
{
try
{
await _feedManagementService.FlagMessage(groupId, feedItemId);
return Ok();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "FlagFeedItem(int)");
return new OopsResult(ex);
}
}
I put breakpoints on the await
line and on the _logger
line. I then use my REST client to hit the specified endpoint (http://myhost/api/groups/1/feeds/1/flag) in debug mode.
I immediately get back a blank 200 response... but the await method is never hit, nor is the service underneath, and I never reach the breakpoint(s). I'm scratching my head on this. I would think this was a thread deadlocking issue but for the fact that it actually returns a 200 status code.
What could be the problem here? The routing appears to be correct, I can intercept on the controller's constructor, all looks fine... but when it gets here, the system just decides it doesn't actually need to do anything.
BTW, the FeedItemAccess
filter just checks the user's tenancy rights to connect to the endpoint; it also appears to be working fine (I can intercept on that too and it's leaving the filter under success conditions).
c# asp.net-core asp.net-core-webapi
I have an API controller with a method like so:
[HttpGet]
[Route("~/api/groups/{groupId}/feeds/{feedItemId}/flag")]
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
public async Task<IActionResult> FlagFeedItem([FromRoute] int groupId, [FromRoute] long feedItemId)
{
try
{
await _feedManagementService.FlagMessage(groupId, feedItemId);
return Ok();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "FlagFeedItem(int)");
return new OopsResult(ex);
}
}
I put breakpoints on the await
line and on the _logger
line. I then use my REST client to hit the specified endpoint (http://myhost/api/groups/1/feeds/1/flag) in debug mode.
I immediately get back a blank 200 response... but the await method is never hit, nor is the service underneath, and I never reach the breakpoint(s). I'm scratching my head on this. I would think this was a thread deadlocking issue but for the fact that it actually returns a 200 status code.
What could be the problem here? The routing appears to be correct, I can intercept on the controller's constructor, all looks fine... but when it gets here, the system just decides it doesn't actually need to do anything.
BTW, the FeedItemAccess
filter just checks the user's tenancy rights to connect to the endpoint; it also appears to be working fine (I can intercept on that too and it's leaving the filter under success conditions).
c# asp.net-core asp.net-core-webapi
c# asp.net-core asp.net-core-webapi
asked Nov 13 '18 at 23:54
Jeremy HolovacsJeremy Holovacs
12k2175184
12k2175184
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
What happens if you comment out[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
2
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13
|
show 3 more comments
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
What happens if you comment out[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
2
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
What happens if you comment out
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
What happens if you comment out
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
2
2
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As @mjwills suggested, I should have been a bit more careful in dismissing what could or could not cause this behavior. I had thought I understood how the action filter was supposed to behave, and since it seemed to be doing what I wanted, I knew it wasn't the problem... but it actually was.
Removing all possible culprits and methodically adding them back in... sometimes it's the only way to find the problem.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291185%2fasp-net-core-cant-step-into-endpoint-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As @mjwills suggested, I should have been a bit more careful in dismissing what could or could not cause this behavior. I had thought I understood how the action filter was supposed to behave, and since it seemed to be doing what I wanted, I knew it wasn't the problem... but it actually was.
Removing all possible culprits and methodically adding them back in... sometimes it's the only way to find the problem.
add a comment |
As @mjwills suggested, I should have been a bit more careful in dismissing what could or could not cause this behavior. I had thought I understood how the action filter was supposed to behave, and since it seemed to be doing what I wanted, I knew it wasn't the problem... but it actually was.
Removing all possible culprits and methodically adding them back in... sometimes it's the only way to find the problem.
add a comment |
As @mjwills suggested, I should have been a bit more careful in dismissing what could or could not cause this behavior. I had thought I understood how the action filter was supposed to behave, and since it seemed to be doing what I wanted, I knew it wasn't the problem... but it actually was.
Removing all possible culprits and methodically adding them back in... sometimes it's the only way to find the problem.
As @mjwills suggested, I should have been a bit more careful in dismissing what could or could not cause this behavior. I had thought I understood how the action filter was supposed to behave, and since it seemed to be doing what I wanted, I knew it wasn't the problem... but it actually was.
Removing all possible culprits and methodically adding them back in... sometimes it's the only way to find the problem.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:37
Jeremy HolovacsJeremy Holovacs
12k2175184
12k2175184
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291185%2fasp-net-core-cant-step-into-endpoint-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you tried the old "restart Visual Studio" and "clean solution"?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:00
yeah... though I'm about to try "restart the computer and/ or drop it in the ocean" next... it's just this one endpoint. Makes no sense.
– Jeremy Holovacs
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
If you change the route attribute but use the same URL, does it still give you HTTP 200?
– DavidG
Nov 14 '18 at 0:05
What happens if you comment out
[FeedItemAccess(AccessLevelTypes.GroupMember, "groupId")]
?– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:06
2
Well, clearly it is something to do with that attribute.
– mjwills
Nov 14 '18 at 0:13