Eliminating linear combinations from lists












4














Suppose I have a list of simple expressions, something like:



list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},{-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


These expressions are going to become elements in a linear combination. But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two. Therefore, my "basis" really should be this list without one of the first three elements (it doesn't matter which one goes away, but for consistency I would like to remove the third of them). Is there an automated way in Mathematica to search a list of expressions like this, identify when elements are linear combinations of others, and then remove the extraneous elements?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    "But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 12 at 5:49










  • Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:53
















4














Suppose I have a list of simple expressions, something like:



list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},{-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


These expressions are going to become elements in a linear combination. But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two. Therefore, my "basis" really should be this list without one of the first three elements (it doesn't matter which one goes away, but for consistency I would like to remove the third of them). Is there an automated way in Mathematica to search a list of expressions like this, identify when elements are linear combinations of others, and then remove the extraneous elements?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    "But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 12 at 5:49










  • Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:53














4












4








4







Suppose I have a list of simple expressions, something like:



list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},{-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


These expressions are going to become elements in a linear combination. But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two. Therefore, my "basis" really should be this list without one of the first three elements (it doesn't matter which one goes away, but for consistency I would like to remove the third of them). Is there an automated way in Mathematica to search a list of expressions like this, identify when elements are linear combinations of others, and then remove the extraneous elements?










share|improve this question















Suppose I have a list of simple expressions, something like:



list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},{-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


These expressions are going to become elements in a linear combination. But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two. Therefore, my "basis" really should be this list without one of the first three elements (it doesn't matter which one goes away, but for consistency I would like to remove the third of them). Is there an automated way in Mathematica to search a list of expressions like this, identify when elements are linear combinations of others, and then remove the extraneous elements?







list-manipulation linear-algebra






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 13 at 19:53

























asked Nov 12 at 5:26









Kevin Ausman

1637




1637








  • 2




    "But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 12 at 5:49










  • Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:53














  • 2




    "But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 12 at 5:49










  • Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:53








2




2




"But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
– David G. Stork
Nov 12 at 5:49




"But notice that the third element in this list is itself already a linear combination of the first two." Nope. Check it (especially $e$).
– David G. Stork
Nov 12 at 5:49












Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
– Kevin Ausman
Nov 13 at 19:53




Yeah, typo. Fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
– Kevin Ausman
Nov 13 at 19:53










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














Take your list and fix it so that the 3rd element dependent on the first two:



list[[3]] = (list[[2]] + list[[1]])/3 // Expand;
list
(*
{{2a + b - c - 2d - e + f}, {a + 2b + c - d - 2 e - f}, {-a + b + 2c + d - e - 2f},
{x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
*)


Convert system of linear functions to a matrix:



vars = Variables@list;
linsys = CoefficientArrays[Flatten@list, vars][[2]];


Extract linearly independent elements of list:



Extract[list, 
FirstPosition[#, 1, Nothing] & /@ RowReduce[Transpose@linsys]]
(*
{{a - b - 2 c - d + e + 2 f}, {-a - 2 b - c + d + 2 e + f},
{x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
*)


Or row reduce to get an equivalent basis:



RowReduce[linsys].vars // DeleteCases[0]
(* {a - c - d + f, b + c - e - f, x, y, z} *)





share|improve this answer























  • The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 12 at 19:13










  • @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
    – Michael E2
    Nov 12 at 19:40










  • Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:47










  • And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
    – Kevin Ausman
    Nov 13 at 19:51










  • @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
    – Michael E2
    Nov 13 at 19:55



















3














What I would do is replace symbols by numeric vectors with a function like



ClearAll[toNumbers];
toNumbers[list_, vars_] :=
list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]];

toNumbers[{a, b, a + b}, {a, b}]
(*{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}*)


then perform some linear algebra and convert the result back into symbols with something like



ClearAll[fromNumbers];
fromNumbers[list_, vars_] := Replace[
list,
x_ :> x.vars,
{1}
];

fromNumbers[{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}, {a, b}]
(*{a, b, a + b}*)


The linear algebra logic can be something like Fold which checks a vector and appends it to a list if it is linear independent form the vectors in the list:



Fold[
f,
{},
{{1, 1, 0}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}
]


where



ClearAll[f];
f[vecs_, vec_] := With[
{
vecs2 = Append[vecs, vec]
},
vecs2 /; MatrixRank[vecs2] == Length[vecs2]
];
f[vecs_, vec_] := vecs;


Gathering all together (except f):



ClearAll[leaveLinearIndependent];
leaveLinearIndependent[list_, vars_] := Replace[
Fold[
f,
{},
list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]]
],
x_ :> x.vars,
{1}
];

leaveLinearIndependent[{a, a + b, b, c}, {a, b, c}]
(*{a, a + b, c}*)





share|improve this answer





























    2














    list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},
    {-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


    First extract coefficient arrays.



    coeffArrays = Normal[CoefficientArrays[list]][[2,All,1]]               

    (* ut[29]= {{1, -1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0},
    {-1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0},
    {-2, -1, 1, 2, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, -1},
    {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1}} *)


    Find null vectors of the transpose.



    nulls = NullSpace[Transpose@dd]                                        

    (* Out[30]= {{1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0}} *)


    We want to remove vectors in positions of last nonzero value in each null vector (of which there is but one, in this case). We can automate the task of finding the list to remove as below.



    Flatten[Length[nulls[[1]]] + 1 -
    Map[FirstPosition[#,Except[0],Heads->False]&,
    Map[Reverse,nulls]]]

    (* Out[41]= {3} *)





    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185825%2feliminating-linear-combinations-from-lists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      Take your list and fix it so that the 3rd element dependent on the first two:



      list[[3]] = (list[[2]] + list[[1]])/3 // Expand;
      list
      (*
      {{2a + b - c - 2d - e + f}, {a + 2b + c - d - 2 e - f}, {-a + b + 2c + d - e - 2f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Convert system of linear functions to a matrix:



      vars = Variables@list;
      linsys = CoefficientArrays[Flatten@list, vars][[2]];


      Extract linearly independent elements of list:



      Extract[list, 
      FirstPosition[#, 1, Nothing] & /@ RowReduce[Transpose@linsys]]
      (*
      {{a - b - 2 c - d + e + 2 f}, {-a - 2 b - c + d + 2 e + f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Or row reduce to get an equivalent basis:



      RowReduce[linsys].vars // DeleteCases[0]
      (* {a - c - d + f, b + c - e - f, x, y, z} *)





      share|improve this answer























      • The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 12 at 19:13










      • @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
        – Michael E2
        Nov 12 at 19:40










      • Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:47










      • And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:51










      • @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
        – Michael E2
        Nov 13 at 19:55
















      2














      Take your list and fix it so that the 3rd element dependent on the first two:



      list[[3]] = (list[[2]] + list[[1]])/3 // Expand;
      list
      (*
      {{2a + b - c - 2d - e + f}, {a + 2b + c - d - 2 e - f}, {-a + b + 2c + d - e - 2f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Convert system of linear functions to a matrix:



      vars = Variables@list;
      linsys = CoefficientArrays[Flatten@list, vars][[2]];


      Extract linearly independent elements of list:



      Extract[list, 
      FirstPosition[#, 1, Nothing] & /@ RowReduce[Transpose@linsys]]
      (*
      {{a - b - 2 c - d + e + 2 f}, {-a - 2 b - c + d + 2 e + f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Or row reduce to get an equivalent basis:



      RowReduce[linsys].vars // DeleteCases[0]
      (* {a - c - d + f, b + c - e - f, x, y, z} *)





      share|improve this answer























      • The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 12 at 19:13










      • @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
        – Michael E2
        Nov 12 at 19:40










      • Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:47










      • And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:51










      • @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
        – Michael E2
        Nov 13 at 19:55














      2












      2








      2






      Take your list and fix it so that the 3rd element dependent on the first two:



      list[[3]] = (list[[2]] + list[[1]])/3 // Expand;
      list
      (*
      {{2a + b - c - 2d - e + f}, {a + 2b + c - d - 2 e - f}, {-a + b + 2c + d - e - 2f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Convert system of linear functions to a matrix:



      vars = Variables@list;
      linsys = CoefficientArrays[Flatten@list, vars][[2]];


      Extract linearly independent elements of list:



      Extract[list, 
      FirstPosition[#, 1, Nothing] & /@ RowReduce[Transpose@linsys]]
      (*
      {{a - b - 2 c - d + e + 2 f}, {-a - 2 b - c + d + 2 e + f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Or row reduce to get an equivalent basis:



      RowReduce[linsys].vars // DeleteCases[0]
      (* {a - c - d + f, b + c - e - f, x, y, z} *)





      share|improve this answer














      Take your list and fix it so that the 3rd element dependent on the first two:



      list[[3]] = (list[[2]] + list[[1]])/3 // Expand;
      list
      (*
      {{2a + b - c - 2d - e + f}, {a + 2b + c - d - 2 e - f}, {-a + b + 2c + d - e - 2f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Convert system of linear functions to a matrix:



      vars = Variables@list;
      linsys = CoefficientArrays[Flatten@list, vars][[2]];


      Extract linearly independent elements of list:



      Extract[list, 
      FirstPosition[#, 1, Nothing] & /@ RowReduce[Transpose@linsys]]
      (*
      {{a - b - 2 c - d + e + 2 f}, {-a - 2 b - c + d + 2 e + f},
      {x - y - z}, {-x + y - z}, {-x - y + z}}
      *)


      Or row reduce to get an equivalent basis:



      RowReduce[linsys].vars // DeleteCases[0]
      (* {a - c - d + f, b + c - e - f, x, y, z} *)






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 14 at 0:02









      Kevin Ausman

      1637




      1637










      answered Nov 12 at 11:32









      Michael E2

      145k11194464




      145k11194464












      • The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 12 at 19:13










      • @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
        – Michael E2
        Nov 12 at 19:40










      • Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:47










      • And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:51










      • @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
        – Michael E2
        Nov 13 at 19:55


















      • The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 12 at 19:13










      • @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
        – Michael E2
        Nov 12 at 19:40










      • Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:47










      • And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
        – Kevin Ausman
        Nov 13 at 19:51










      • @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
        – Michael E2
        Nov 13 at 19:55
















      The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 12 at 19:13




      The example I started with does have the third entry dependent on the first two (element 2 minus element 1 is element 3). But regardless, your approach worked perfectly! Thank you!
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 12 at 19:13












      @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
      – Michael E2
      Nov 12 at 19:40




      @KevinAusman You're welcome. (Maybe there's a typo in the question because elt. 2 minus elt. 1 should have a + e in the expression, but there are no e.)
      – Michael E2
      Nov 12 at 19:40












      Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 13 at 19:47




      Huh. You are obviously correct about the typo. Thank you! Fixing it now.
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 13 at 19:47












      And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 13 at 19:51




      And I accidentally, in trying to fix the problem, tried to edit your response! So sorry... I don't know how to withdraw my suggested edit. Clearly I didn't get enough sleep last nigh.
      – Kevin Ausman
      Nov 13 at 19:51












      @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
      – Michael E2
      Nov 13 at 19:55




      @KevinAusman No problem. New users' edits of other posts go through a queue for approval. Those who review it might reject it, if they spot the error. If it does go through, it can be rolled back. Hopefully they will see your comment and reject it.
      – Michael E2
      Nov 13 at 19:55











      3














      What I would do is replace symbols by numeric vectors with a function like



      ClearAll[toNumbers];
      toNumbers[list_, vars_] :=
      list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]];

      toNumbers[{a, b, a + b}, {a, b}]
      (*{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}*)


      then perform some linear algebra and convert the result back into symbols with something like



      ClearAll[fromNumbers];
      fromNumbers[list_, vars_] := Replace[
      list,
      x_ :> x.vars,
      {1}
      ];

      fromNumbers[{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}, {a, b}]
      (*{a, b, a + b}*)


      The linear algebra logic can be something like Fold which checks a vector and appends it to a list if it is linear independent form the vectors in the list:



      Fold[
      f,
      {},
      {{1, 1, 0}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}
      ]


      where



      ClearAll[f];
      f[vecs_, vec_] := With[
      {
      vecs2 = Append[vecs, vec]
      },
      vecs2 /; MatrixRank[vecs2] == Length[vecs2]
      ];
      f[vecs_, vec_] := vecs;


      Gathering all together (except f):



      ClearAll[leaveLinearIndependent];
      leaveLinearIndependent[list_, vars_] := Replace[
      Fold[
      f,
      {},
      list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]]
      ],
      x_ :> x.vars,
      {1}
      ];

      leaveLinearIndependent[{a, a + b, b, c}, {a, b, c}]
      (*{a, a + b, c}*)





      share|improve this answer


























        3














        What I would do is replace symbols by numeric vectors with a function like



        ClearAll[toNumbers];
        toNumbers[list_, vars_] :=
        list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]];

        toNumbers[{a, b, a + b}, {a, b}]
        (*{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}*)


        then perform some linear algebra and convert the result back into symbols with something like



        ClearAll[fromNumbers];
        fromNumbers[list_, vars_] := Replace[
        list,
        x_ :> x.vars,
        {1}
        ];

        fromNumbers[{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}, {a, b}]
        (*{a, b, a + b}*)


        The linear algebra logic can be something like Fold which checks a vector and appends it to a list if it is linear independent form the vectors in the list:



        Fold[
        f,
        {},
        {{1, 1, 0}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}
        ]


        where



        ClearAll[f];
        f[vecs_, vec_] := With[
        {
        vecs2 = Append[vecs, vec]
        },
        vecs2 /; MatrixRank[vecs2] == Length[vecs2]
        ];
        f[vecs_, vec_] := vecs;


        Gathering all together (except f):



        ClearAll[leaveLinearIndependent];
        leaveLinearIndependent[list_, vars_] := Replace[
        Fold[
        f,
        {},
        list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]]
        ],
        x_ :> x.vars,
        {1}
        ];

        leaveLinearIndependent[{a, a + b, b, c}, {a, b, c}]
        (*{a, a + b, c}*)





        share|improve this answer
























          3












          3








          3






          What I would do is replace symbols by numeric vectors with a function like



          ClearAll[toNumbers];
          toNumbers[list_, vars_] :=
          list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]];

          toNumbers[{a, b, a + b}, {a, b}]
          (*{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}*)


          then perform some linear algebra and convert the result back into symbols with something like



          ClearAll[fromNumbers];
          fromNumbers[list_, vars_] := Replace[
          list,
          x_ :> x.vars,
          {1}
          ];

          fromNumbers[{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}, {a, b}]
          (*{a, b, a + b}*)


          The linear algebra logic can be something like Fold which checks a vector and appends it to a list if it is linear independent form the vectors in the list:



          Fold[
          f,
          {},
          {{1, 1, 0}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}
          ]


          where



          ClearAll[f];
          f[vecs_, vec_] := With[
          {
          vecs2 = Append[vecs, vec]
          },
          vecs2 /; MatrixRank[vecs2] == Length[vecs2]
          ];
          f[vecs_, vec_] := vecs;


          Gathering all together (except f):



          ClearAll[leaveLinearIndependent];
          leaveLinearIndependent[list_, vars_] := Replace[
          Fold[
          f,
          {},
          list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]]
          ],
          x_ :> x.vars,
          {1}
          ];

          leaveLinearIndependent[{a, a + b, b, c}, {a, b, c}]
          (*{a, a + b, c}*)





          share|improve this answer












          What I would do is replace symbols by numeric vectors with a function like



          ClearAll[toNumbers];
          toNumbers[list_, vars_] :=
          list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]];

          toNumbers[{a, b, a + b}, {a, b}]
          (*{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}*)


          then perform some linear algebra and convert the result back into symbols with something like



          ClearAll[fromNumbers];
          fromNumbers[list_, vars_] := Replace[
          list,
          x_ :> x.vars,
          {1}
          ];

          fromNumbers[{{1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}, {a, b}]
          (*{a, b, a + b}*)


          The linear algebra logic can be something like Fold which checks a vector and appends it to a list if it is linear independent form the vectors in the list:



          Fold[
          f,
          {},
          {{1, 1, 0}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}
          ]


          where



          ClearAll[f];
          f[vecs_, vec_] := With[
          {
          vecs2 = Append[vecs, vec]
          },
          vecs2 /; MatrixRank[vecs2] == Length[vecs2]
          ];
          f[vecs_, vec_] := vecs;


          Gathering all together (except f):



          ClearAll[leaveLinearIndependent];
          leaveLinearIndependent[list_, vars_] := Replace[
          Fold[
          f,
          {},
          list /. Thread[vars -> IdentityMatrix[Length[vars]]]
          ],
          x_ :> x.vars,
          {1}
          ];

          leaveLinearIndependent[{a, a + b, b, c}, {a, b, c}]
          (*{a, a + b, c}*)






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 12 at 8:28









          Anton.Sakovich

          45628




          45628























              2














              list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},
              {-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


              First extract coefficient arrays.



              coeffArrays = Normal[CoefficientArrays[list]][[2,All,1]]               

              (* ut[29]= {{1, -1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0},
              {-1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0},
              {-2, -1, 1, 2, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, -1},
              {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1}} *)


              Find null vectors of the transpose.



              nulls = NullSpace[Transpose@dd]                                        

              (* Out[30]= {{1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0}} *)


              We want to remove vectors in positions of last nonzero value in each null vector (of which there is but one, in this case). We can automate the task of finding the list to remove as below.



              Flatten[Length[nulls[[1]]] + 1 -
              Map[FirstPosition[#,Except[0],Heads->False]&,
              Map[Reverse,nulls]]]

              (* Out[41]= {3} *)





              share|improve this answer


























                2














                list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},
                {-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


                First extract coefficient arrays.



                coeffArrays = Normal[CoefficientArrays[list]][[2,All,1]]               

                (* ut[29]= {{1, -1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0},
                {-1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0},
                {-2, -1, 1, 2, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, -1},
                {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1}} *)


                Find null vectors of the transpose.



                nulls = NullSpace[Transpose@dd]                                        

                (* Out[30]= {{1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0}} *)


                We want to remove vectors in positions of last nonzero value in each null vector (of which there is but one, in this case). We can automate the task of finding the list to remove as below.



                Flatten[Length[nulls[[1]]] + 1 -
                Map[FirstPosition[#,Except[0],Heads->False]&,
                Map[Reverse,nulls]]]

                (* Out[41]= {3} *)





                share|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},
                  {-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


                  First extract coefficient arrays.



                  coeffArrays = Normal[CoefficientArrays[list]][[2,All,1]]               

                  (* ut[29]= {{1, -1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0},
                  {-1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0},
                  {-2, -1, 1, 2, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, -1},
                  {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1}} *)


                  Find null vectors of the transpose.



                  nulls = NullSpace[Transpose@dd]                                        

                  (* Out[30]= {{1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0}} *)


                  We want to remove vectors in positions of last nonzero value in each null vector (of which there is but one, in this case). We can automate the task of finding the list to remove as below.



                  Flatten[Length[nulls[[1]]] + 1 -
                  Map[FirstPosition[#,Except[0],Heads->False]&,
                  Map[Reverse,nulls]]]

                  (* Out[41]= {3} *)





                  share|improve this answer












                  list = {{a-b-2c-d+e+2f},{-a-2b-c+d+2e+f},
                  {-2a-b+c+2d+e-f},{x-y-z},{-x+y-z},{-x-y+z}};


                  First extract coefficient arrays.



                  coeffArrays = Normal[CoefficientArrays[list]][[2,All,1]]               

                  (* ut[29]= {{1, -1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0},
                  {-1, -2, -1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0},
                  {-2, -1, 1, 2, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, -1},
                  {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1}} *)


                  Find null vectors of the transpose.



                  nulls = NullSpace[Transpose@dd]                                        

                  (* Out[30]= {{1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 0}} *)


                  We want to remove vectors in positions of last nonzero value in each null vector (of which there is but one, in this case). We can automate the task of finding the list to remove as below.



                  Flatten[Length[nulls[[1]]] + 1 -
                  Map[FirstPosition[#,Except[0],Heads->False]&,
                  Map[Reverse,nulls]]]

                  (* Out[41]= {3} *)






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 14 at 15:11









                  Daniel Lichtblau

                  46.4k275162




                  46.4k275162






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185825%2feliminating-linear-combinations-from-lists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Florida Star v. B. J. F.

                      Danny Elfman

                      Lugert, Oklahoma