Avoiding a repeated handler call
I have the following in the html of an Angular project:
<input type="text"
class="whatever"
(blur)="myEvent()"
(keyup.enter)="myEvent()">
This works, but the repetition of "myEvent()" feels like a DRY violation. Is there a way to link both blur and keyup.enter to that event without repeating the call?
html angular events
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
add a comment |
I have the following in the html of an Angular project:
<input type="text"
class="whatever"
(blur)="myEvent()"
(keyup.enter)="myEvent()">
This works, but the repetition of "myEvent()" feels like a DRY violation. Is there a way to link both blur and keyup.enter to that event without repeating the call?
html angular events
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
I have the following in the html of an Angular project:
<input type="text"
class="whatever"
(blur)="myEvent()"
(keyup.enter)="myEvent()">
This works, but the repetition of "myEvent()" feels like a DRY violation. Is there a way to link both blur and keyup.enter to that event without repeating the call?
html angular events
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
I have the following in the html of an Angular project:
<input type="text"
class="whatever"
(blur)="myEvent()"
(keyup.enter)="myEvent()">
This works, but the repetition of "myEvent()" feels like a DRY violation. Is there a way to link both blur and keyup.enter to that event without repeating the call?
html angular events
html angular events
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:01
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
8,97041155268
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Based on the comment and the lack of another answer, I'm assuming the answer is "no, there is no way to do that."
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53306271%2favoiding-a-repeated-handler-call%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Based on the comment and the lack of another answer, I'm assuming the answer is "no, there is no way to do that."
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
add a comment |
Based on the comment and the lack of another answer, I'm assuming the answer is "no, there is no way to do that."
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
add a comment |
Based on the comment and the lack of another answer, I'm assuming the answer is "no, there is no way to do that."
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
Based on the comment and the lack of another answer, I'm assuming the answer is "no, there is no way to do that."
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:28
William JockuschWilliam Jockusch
8,97041155268
8,97041155268
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53306271%2favoiding-a-repeated-handler-call%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You should take care of your OCD problem first :)
– Aviad P.
Nov 14 '18 at 18:17
I can't think of any way to do this that wouldn't be significantly messier than the normal way. Best to just deal with it.
– John Montgomery
Nov 14 '18 at 19:33