How to continue processing next items on exception for the following code snippet?












0















When I run the code, the output coming is as follows



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here- java.lang.NullPointerException



In the current output, whenever the second item throws an exception, the flowable stop processing. But I want to process the third object like these



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here {} java.lang.NullPointerException



(c)Test(a=200)



public class Test {
Integer a;

public Integer getA() {
return a * 10;
}

public static void main(String args) {
Test test = new Test(10);
Test test2 = new Test(null); //this object throws exception when it enters flowable
Test test3 = new Test(20);

List<Test> strings = Arrays.asList(test, test2, test3);

Flowable.fromCallable(() -> strings)
.flatMap(s -> Flowable.fromIterable(s)
.flatMap(a -> {
System.out.println(a);
return Flowable.just(a);
})
.onErrorResumeNext(r -> {
System.out.println("error here " + r);
return Flowable.empty();
})
)
.onErrorResumeNext(s -> {
return Flowable.empty();
})
.subscribe();
}`
}


I tried above approach but does not work.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:56











  • Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

    – prabhu
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:17











  • There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:44


















0















When I run the code, the output coming is as follows



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here- java.lang.NullPointerException



In the current output, whenever the second item throws an exception, the flowable stop processing. But I want to process the third object like these



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here {} java.lang.NullPointerException



(c)Test(a=200)



public class Test {
Integer a;

public Integer getA() {
return a * 10;
}

public static void main(String args) {
Test test = new Test(10);
Test test2 = new Test(null); //this object throws exception when it enters flowable
Test test3 = new Test(20);

List<Test> strings = Arrays.asList(test, test2, test3);

Flowable.fromCallable(() -> strings)
.flatMap(s -> Flowable.fromIterable(s)
.flatMap(a -> {
System.out.println(a);
return Flowable.just(a);
})
.onErrorResumeNext(r -> {
System.out.println("error here " + r);
return Flowable.empty();
})
)
.onErrorResumeNext(s -> {
return Flowable.empty();
})
.subscribe();
}`
}


I tried above approach but does not work.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:56











  • Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

    – prabhu
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:17











  • There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:44
















0












0








0








When I run the code, the output coming is as follows



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here- java.lang.NullPointerException



In the current output, whenever the second item throws an exception, the flowable stop processing. But I want to process the third object like these



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here {} java.lang.NullPointerException



(c)Test(a=200)



public class Test {
Integer a;

public Integer getA() {
return a * 10;
}

public static void main(String args) {
Test test = new Test(10);
Test test2 = new Test(null); //this object throws exception when it enters flowable
Test test3 = new Test(20);

List<Test> strings = Arrays.asList(test, test2, test3);

Flowable.fromCallable(() -> strings)
.flatMap(s -> Flowable.fromIterable(s)
.flatMap(a -> {
System.out.println(a);
return Flowable.just(a);
})
.onErrorResumeNext(r -> {
System.out.println("error here " + r);
return Flowable.empty();
})
)
.onErrorResumeNext(s -> {
return Flowable.empty();
})
.subscribe();
}`
}


I tried above approach but does not work.










share|improve this question
















When I run the code, the output coming is as follows



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here- java.lang.NullPointerException



In the current output, whenever the second item throws an exception, the flowable stop processing. But I want to process the third object like these



(a)Test(a=100)



(b)error here {} java.lang.NullPointerException



(c)Test(a=200)



public class Test {
Integer a;

public Integer getA() {
return a * 10;
}

public static void main(String args) {
Test test = new Test(10);
Test test2 = new Test(null); //this object throws exception when it enters flowable
Test test3 = new Test(20);

List<Test> strings = Arrays.asList(test, test2, test3);

Flowable.fromCallable(() -> strings)
.flatMap(s -> Flowable.fromIterable(s)
.flatMap(a -> {
System.out.println(a);
return Flowable.just(a);
})
.onErrorResumeNext(r -> {
System.out.println("error here " + r);
return Flowable.empty();
})
)
.onErrorResumeNext(s -> {
return Flowable.empty();
})
.subscribe();
}`
}


I tried above approach but does not work.







java error-handling nullpointerexception rx-java2






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 8 '18 at 18:30









Filip

3,30931226




3,30931226










asked Nov 14 '18 at 18:00









prabhuprabhu

1




1








  • 1





    Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:56











  • Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

    – prabhu
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:17











  • There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:44
















  • 1





    Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:56











  • Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

    – prabhu
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:17











  • There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

    – ConstOrVar
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:44










1




1





Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

– ConstOrVar
Nov 14 '18 at 18:56





Why you don't want filter Test(null) items? That should solve your problem without any complicated error handling

– ConstOrVar
Nov 14 '18 at 18:56













Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

– prabhu
Nov 15 '18 at 19:17





Here, Test(null) is just for example. I am facing an exception where I can't add a filter. So, I need to handle exception when it comes and continue processing other items

– prabhu
Nov 15 '18 at 19:17













There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

– ConstOrVar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:44







There is overloaded flatMap(Function<? super T,? extends ObservableSource<? extends R>> mapper, boolean delayErrors) that allows delay errors . You can pass delayErros = true in that case.

– ConstOrVar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:44














0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53306244%2fhow-to-continue-processing-next-items-on-exception-for-the-following-code-snippe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53306244%2fhow-to-continue-processing-next-items-on-exception-for-the-following-code-snippe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Lugert, Oklahoma