Connect 4 trouble with the vertical winning condition





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I can't seem to figure out on how I should get my vertical move to work
My board is a nested list consisting of 6 lists with 6 elements in each.



I've been able to figure out my horizontal as well as my diagonal winning condition. But I can't wrap my head around the vertical one



This is my horizontal condition for example



#the list itself 
board = [
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
]

def hor_condition(board, player):
"""the hor_condition checks whether the list contains necessary amount of checkers in order to call it a win"""
for row in board:
for cell in row:
if row.index(cell) < 2:
check_list = [row[row.index(cell)],
row[row.index(cell) + 1],
row[row.index(cell) + 2],
row[row.index(cell) + 3]
]
if check_list[0] == player and
check_list[1] == player and
check_list[2] == player and
check_list[3] == player:
return True


This here checks whether there are 4 of the same elements in the same row by a player in order to call it a win.
What I expect the vertical condition to do is to check if there are 4 of the same checkers in the same column



It might be painful to look at, but bear in mind that I've just started with python and I'm beginning to understand the basics.



I do not really ask for black on white code, rather a push in the right direction



I'd be glad to provide any further information if necessary! Thank you in advance!



Edit:
This is a bit late, but I would like to help anyone else who has had the same problem as I did. I eventually fixed my issue with the following:



def vert_condition(board, player):
"""The vert_condition iterates over the board and checks whether 4 vertical slots contain the same player input by
with the help of a nested loop"""
for row in range(3):
for col in range(6):
if (board[row][col] ==
board[row + 1][col] ==
board[row + 2][col] ==
board[row + 3][col] == player):
return True









share|improve this question

























  • Please explain what is your real problem.

    – Mr Alihoseiny
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:15











  • I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16






  • 2





    Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16











  • @Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23











  • You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23


















0















I can't seem to figure out on how I should get my vertical move to work
My board is a nested list consisting of 6 lists with 6 elements in each.



I've been able to figure out my horizontal as well as my diagonal winning condition. But I can't wrap my head around the vertical one



This is my horizontal condition for example



#the list itself 
board = [
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
]

def hor_condition(board, player):
"""the hor_condition checks whether the list contains necessary amount of checkers in order to call it a win"""
for row in board:
for cell in row:
if row.index(cell) < 2:
check_list = [row[row.index(cell)],
row[row.index(cell) + 1],
row[row.index(cell) + 2],
row[row.index(cell) + 3]
]
if check_list[0] == player and
check_list[1] == player and
check_list[2] == player and
check_list[3] == player:
return True


This here checks whether there are 4 of the same elements in the same row by a player in order to call it a win.
What I expect the vertical condition to do is to check if there are 4 of the same checkers in the same column



It might be painful to look at, but bear in mind that I've just started with python and I'm beginning to understand the basics.



I do not really ask for black on white code, rather a push in the right direction



I'd be glad to provide any further information if necessary! Thank you in advance!



Edit:
This is a bit late, but I would like to help anyone else who has had the same problem as I did. I eventually fixed my issue with the following:



def vert_condition(board, player):
"""The vert_condition iterates over the board and checks whether 4 vertical slots contain the same player input by
with the help of a nested loop"""
for row in range(3):
for col in range(6):
if (board[row][col] ==
board[row + 1][col] ==
board[row + 2][col] ==
board[row + 3][col] == player):
return True









share|improve this question

























  • Please explain what is your real problem.

    – Mr Alihoseiny
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:15











  • I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16






  • 2





    Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16











  • @Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23











  • You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23














0












0








0








I can't seem to figure out on how I should get my vertical move to work
My board is a nested list consisting of 6 lists with 6 elements in each.



I've been able to figure out my horizontal as well as my diagonal winning condition. But I can't wrap my head around the vertical one



This is my horizontal condition for example



#the list itself 
board = [
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
]

def hor_condition(board, player):
"""the hor_condition checks whether the list contains necessary amount of checkers in order to call it a win"""
for row in board:
for cell in row:
if row.index(cell) < 2:
check_list = [row[row.index(cell)],
row[row.index(cell) + 1],
row[row.index(cell) + 2],
row[row.index(cell) + 3]
]
if check_list[0] == player and
check_list[1] == player and
check_list[2] == player and
check_list[3] == player:
return True


This here checks whether there are 4 of the same elements in the same row by a player in order to call it a win.
What I expect the vertical condition to do is to check if there are 4 of the same checkers in the same column



It might be painful to look at, but bear in mind that I've just started with python and I'm beginning to understand the basics.



I do not really ask for black on white code, rather a push in the right direction



I'd be glad to provide any further information if necessary! Thank you in advance!



Edit:
This is a bit late, but I would like to help anyone else who has had the same problem as I did. I eventually fixed my issue with the following:



def vert_condition(board, player):
"""The vert_condition iterates over the board and checks whether 4 vertical slots contain the same player input by
with the help of a nested loop"""
for row in range(3):
for col in range(6):
if (board[row][col] ==
board[row + 1][col] ==
board[row + 2][col] ==
board[row + 3][col] == player):
return True









share|improve this question
















I can't seem to figure out on how I should get my vertical move to work
My board is a nested list consisting of 6 lists with 6 elements in each.



I've been able to figure out my horizontal as well as my diagonal winning condition. But I can't wrap my head around the vertical one



This is my horizontal condition for example



#the list itself 
board = [
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
]

def hor_condition(board, player):
"""the hor_condition checks whether the list contains necessary amount of checkers in order to call it a win"""
for row in board:
for cell in row:
if row.index(cell) < 2:
check_list = [row[row.index(cell)],
row[row.index(cell) + 1],
row[row.index(cell) + 2],
row[row.index(cell) + 3]
]
if check_list[0] == player and
check_list[1] == player and
check_list[2] == player and
check_list[3] == player:
return True


This here checks whether there are 4 of the same elements in the same row by a player in order to call it a win.
What I expect the vertical condition to do is to check if there are 4 of the same checkers in the same column



It might be painful to look at, but bear in mind that I've just started with python and I'm beginning to understand the basics.



I do not really ask for black on white code, rather a push in the right direction



I'd be glad to provide any further information if necessary! Thank you in advance!



Edit:
This is a bit late, but I would like to help anyone else who has had the same problem as I did. I eventually fixed my issue with the following:



def vert_condition(board, player):
"""The vert_condition iterates over the board and checks whether 4 vertical slots contain the same player input by
with the help of a nested loop"""
for row in range(3):
for col in range(6):
if (board[row][col] ==
board[row + 1][col] ==
board[row + 2][col] ==
board[row + 3][col] == player):
return True






python list if-statement






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 10 at 12:45







CCG

















asked Nov 16 '18 at 18:13









CCGCCG

44




44













  • Please explain what is your real problem.

    – Mr Alihoseiny
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:15











  • I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16






  • 2





    Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16











  • @Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23











  • You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23



















  • Please explain what is your real problem.

    – Mr Alihoseiny
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:15











  • I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16






  • 2





    Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:16











  • @Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23











  • You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

    – Prune
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:23

















Please explain what is your real problem.

– Mr Alihoseiny
Nov 16 '18 at 18:15





Please explain what is your real problem.

– Mr Alihoseiny
Nov 16 '18 at 18:15













I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:16





I can't come up with a beginning for the vertical condition

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:16




2




2





Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

– Prune
Nov 16 '18 at 18:16





Welcome to StackOverflow. Please read and follow the posting guidelines in the help documentation, as suggested when you created this account. Minimal, complete, verifiable example applies here. We cannot effectively help you until you post your MCVE code and accurately describe the problem. We should be able to paste your posted code into a text file and reproduce the problem you described.

– Prune
Nov 16 '18 at 18:16













@Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:23





@Prune I wish I could comply but I would not know what else to share. As I tried to explain, I wanted to get an idea on how to tackle a function which checks if the condition ( in this case 4 elements of the same player in one column one after each other ) has been met.

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:23













You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

– Prune
Nov 16 '18 at 18:23





You've simply dropped some cognate code on us without any demonstration of your data structures, and none of the required instrumentation for us to test a suggestion or solution. I have little idea what a cell is, that you have to locate another instance with index. I don't know why 2 is the boundary. I don't understand the repeated calls. As the posting guidelines tell you, please make it easy for us to help you.

– Prune
Nov 16 '18 at 18:23












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














You could iterate in afor col in boardkind of way:



for col_index in range(6):
col = [row[col_index] for row in board]
for i in range(len(col) - 4 + 1):
if all(col[i + j] == player for j in range(4)):
return True


Since you can’t directly iterate over rows, iterate with an index counter - in this case a range(6) - and each time pull out the n-th element of each row to construct the column.



I suggest a small amendment to your code also:



Where you keep writing row.index(cell), this is a heavy computation so calculate it once and store it in a variable so you can re-use the result instead of continuously re-calculating it when you could just as easily store it.



To make it even better, use the all built-in which you provide an iterable and returns true if all elements are true.



In addition, you only need to check 6 - 4 + 1 (=3) times since....




  • the first check covers 1st - 4th

  • the second checks 2nd - 5th

  • the third checks 3rd - 6th


And after that there’s no more as there isn’t a 7th cell in the row (and column). The calculation which I included in my code was:



len(row) - len(what’s being checked) + 1





share|improve this answer


























  • I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:30












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53343309%2fconnect-4-trouble-with-the-vertical-winning-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














You could iterate in afor col in boardkind of way:



for col_index in range(6):
col = [row[col_index] for row in board]
for i in range(len(col) - 4 + 1):
if all(col[i + j] == player for j in range(4)):
return True


Since you can’t directly iterate over rows, iterate with an index counter - in this case a range(6) - and each time pull out the n-th element of each row to construct the column.



I suggest a small amendment to your code also:



Where you keep writing row.index(cell), this is a heavy computation so calculate it once and store it in a variable so you can re-use the result instead of continuously re-calculating it when you could just as easily store it.



To make it even better, use the all built-in which you provide an iterable and returns true if all elements are true.



In addition, you only need to check 6 - 4 + 1 (=3) times since....




  • the first check covers 1st - 4th

  • the second checks 2nd - 5th

  • the third checks 3rd - 6th


And after that there’s no more as there isn’t a 7th cell in the row (and column). The calculation which I included in my code was:



len(row) - len(what’s being checked) + 1





share|improve this answer


























  • I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:30
















0














You could iterate in afor col in boardkind of way:



for col_index in range(6):
col = [row[col_index] for row in board]
for i in range(len(col) - 4 + 1):
if all(col[i + j] == player for j in range(4)):
return True


Since you can’t directly iterate over rows, iterate with an index counter - in this case a range(6) - and each time pull out the n-th element of each row to construct the column.



I suggest a small amendment to your code also:



Where you keep writing row.index(cell), this is a heavy computation so calculate it once and store it in a variable so you can re-use the result instead of continuously re-calculating it when you could just as easily store it.



To make it even better, use the all built-in which you provide an iterable and returns true if all elements are true.



In addition, you only need to check 6 - 4 + 1 (=3) times since....




  • the first check covers 1st - 4th

  • the second checks 2nd - 5th

  • the third checks 3rd - 6th


And after that there’s no more as there isn’t a 7th cell in the row (and column). The calculation which I included in my code was:



len(row) - len(what’s being checked) + 1





share|improve this answer


























  • I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:30














0












0








0







You could iterate in afor col in boardkind of way:



for col_index in range(6):
col = [row[col_index] for row in board]
for i in range(len(col) - 4 + 1):
if all(col[i + j] == player for j in range(4)):
return True


Since you can’t directly iterate over rows, iterate with an index counter - in this case a range(6) - and each time pull out the n-th element of each row to construct the column.



I suggest a small amendment to your code also:



Where you keep writing row.index(cell), this is a heavy computation so calculate it once and store it in a variable so you can re-use the result instead of continuously re-calculating it when you could just as easily store it.



To make it even better, use the all built-in which you provide an iterable and returns true if all elements are true.



In addition, you only need to check 6 - 4 + 1 (=3) times since....




  • the first check covers 1st - 4th

  • the second checks 2nd - 5th

  • the third checks 3rd - 6th


And after that there’s no more as there isn’t a 7th cell in the row (and column). The calculation which I included in my code was:



len(row) - len(what’s being checked) + 1





share|improve this answer















You could iterate in afor col in boardkind of way:



for col_index in range(6):
col = [row[col_index] for row in board]
for i in range(len(col) - 4 + 1):
if all(col[i + j] == player for j in range(4)):
return True


Since you can’t directly iterate over rows, iterate with an index counter - in this case a range(6) - and each time pull out the n-th element of each row to construct the column.



I suggest a small amendment to your code also:



Where you keep writing row.index(cell), this is a heavy computation so calculate it once and store it in a variable so you can re-use the result instead of continuously re-calculating it when you could just as easily store it.



To make it even better, use the all built-in which you provide an iterable and returns true if all elements are true.



In addition, you only need to check 6 - 4 + 1 (=3) times since....




  • the first check covers 1st - 4th

  • the second checks 2nd - 5th

  • the third checks 3rd - 6th


And after that there’s no more as there isn’t a 7th cell in the row (and column). The calculation which I included in my code was:



len(row) - len(what’s being checked) + 1






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 16 '18 at 18:31

























answered Nov 16 '18 at 18:26









N ChauhanN Chauhan

1,8641215




1,8641215













  • I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:30



















  • I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

    – CCG
    Nov 16 '18 at 18:30

















I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:30





I see! I will try to implement said amendment! Thank you!

– CCG
Nov 16 '18 at 18:30




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53343309%2fconnect-4-trouble-with-the-vertical-winning-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Retrieve a Users Dashboard in Tumblr with R and TumblR. Oauth Issues