Is it possible to define instances in the RDFS file?
for example, could we say in the RDFS SW is thought by MZ
IF yes what is the correct syntax to do it
I appreciate your help
rdf semantic-web ontology rdfs
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
add a comment |
for example, could we say in the RDFS SW is thought by MZ
IF yes what is the correct syntax to do it
I appreciate your help
rdf semantic-web ontology rdfs
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
1
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38
add a comment |
for example, could we say in the RDFS SW is thought by MZ
IF yes what is the correct syntax to do it
I appreciate your help
rdf semantic-web ontology rdfs
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
for example, could we say in the RDFS SW is thought by MZ
IF yes what is the correct syntax to do it
I appreciate your help
rdf semantic-web ontology rdfs
rdf semantic-web ontology rdfs
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
asked Nov 16 '18 at 0:08
Saad AlajlanSaad Alajlan
153
153
1
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38
add a comment |
1
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38
1
1
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
RDFS is essentially just a pre-defined set of RDF resources (such as rdfs:Class, rdfs:subClassOf, etc.). In other words, an RDF Schema is itself just an RDF model. There is nothing to stop you from putting the RDF Schema and the instance data of your RDF model in the same file. It's all triples.
RDF(S) is an abstract model and has no requirements about where the information is stored, or in what order. So you can first define all your instance data, then add the RDFS data, or the other way around, or even mixed up. It can all be in one file, or split over two or more, whatever you want.
Of course, to keep things readable for yourself it may be easier to define the schema data first and the instances later, and possibly also to split the schema and instance data into separate files, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53329608%2fis-it-possible-to-define-instances-in-the-rdfs-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
RDFS is essentially just a pre-defined set of RDF resources (such as rdfs:Class, rdfs:subClassOf, etc.). In other words, an RDF Schema is itself just an RDF model. There is nothing to stop you from putting the RDF Schema and the instance data of your RDF model in the same file. It's all triples.
RDF(S) is an abstract model and has no requirements about where the information is stored, or in what order. So you can first define all your instance data, then add the RDFS data, or the other way around, or even mixed up. It can all be in one file, or split over two or more, whatever you want.
Of course, to keep things readable for yourself it may be easier to define the schema data first and the instances later, and possibly also to split the schema and instance data into separate files, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
add a comment |
RDFS is essentially just a pre-defined set of RDF resources (such as rdfs:Class, rdfs:subClassOf, etc.). In other words, an RDF Schema is itself just an RDF model. There is nothing to stop you from putting the RDF Schema and the instance data of your RDF model in the same file. It's all triples.
RDF(S) is an abstract model and has no requirements about where the information is stored, or in what order. So you can first define all your instance data, then add the RDFS data, or the other way around, or even mixed up. It can all be in one file, or split over two or more, whatever you want.
Of course, to keep things readable for yourself it may be easier to define the schema data first and the instances later, and possibly also to split the schema and instance data into separate files, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
add a comment |
RDFS is essentially just a pre-defined set of RDF resources (such as rdfs:Class, rdfs:subClassOf, etc.). In other words, an RDF Schema is itself just an RDF model. There is nothing to stop you from putting the RDF Schema and the instance data of your RDF model in the same file. It's all triples.
RDF(S) is an abstract model and has no requirements about where the information is stored, or in what order. So you can first define all your instance data, then add the RDFS data, or the other way around, or even mixed up. It can all be in one file, or split over two or more, whatever you want.
Of course, to keep things readable for yourself it may be easier to define the schema data first and the instances later, and possibly also to split the schema and instance data into separate files, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
RDFS is essentially just a pre-defined set of RDF resources (such as rdfs:Class, rdfs:subClassOf, etc.). In other words, an RDF Schema is itself just an RDF model. There is nothing to stop you from putting the RDF Schema and the instance data of your RDF model in the same file. It's all triples.
RDF(S) is an abstract model and has no requirements about where the information is stored, or in what order. So you can first define all your instance data, then add the RDFS data, or the other way around, or even mixed up. It can all be in one file, or split over two or more, whatever you want.
Of course, to keep things readable for yourself it may be easier to define the schema data first and the instances later, and possibly also to split the schema and instance data into separate files, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
answered Nov 17 '18 at 0:19
Jeen BroekstraJeen Broekstra
16.6k43761
16.6k43761
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53329608%2fis-it-possible-to-define-instances-in-the-rdfs-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
why not? RDFS is still written as RDF triples, everything is an RDF triple, just add the RDF triple
– AKSW
Nov 16 '18 at 7:38