object with an array of arrays with client side cache
I have a schema that for ease of describing is as such
type level0 {
ID id
String name
[level1] level1s
}
type level1 {
ID id
String name
[level2] level2s
}
type level2 {
ID id
String name
}
type Query {
getLevel0(ID: id)
}
when I initially get my data I query build my query as such
query GetLevel0($id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
So at this point I now get a fully nested object hierarchy of my data so that I can eager load everything I need to quickly manage the data.
So now my question is when I go to manage my level2s collection for the top down binding this object hierarchy just flows without the need to create additional queries for direct access to the other information. I am also using the client InMemoryCache that I want to keep updated without additional network calls being made to return the full data over again.
Is there a way that I can build a schema to support filtering on a sub collection?
like for example
query GetLevel0($id: ID, $level1id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s(id: $level1id) {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
Looking to know if that would be a way to possible be able to preform the filter from the cache results when I do a cache.readQuery to add new or delete entries from the sub collections.
Any additional knowledge on this would be great.
Thanks!
graphql react-apollo aws-appsync
add a comment |
I have a schema that for ease of describing is as such
type level0 {
ID id
String name
[level1] level1s
}
type level1 {
ID id
String name
[level2] level2s
}
type level2 {
ID id
String name
}
type Query {
getLevel0(ID: id)
}
when I initially get my data I query build my query as such
query GetLevel0($id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
So at this point I now get a fully nested object hierarchy of my data so that I can eager load everything I need to quickly manage the data.
So now my question is when I go to manage my level2s collection for the top down binding this object hierarchy just flows without the need to create additional queries for direct access to the other information. I am also using the client InMemoryCache that I want to keep updated without additional network calls being made to return the full data over again.
Is there a way that I can build a schema to support filtering on a sub collection?
like for example
query GetLevel0($id: ID, $level1id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s(id: $level1id) {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
Looking to know if that would be a way to possible be able to preform the filter from the cache results when I do a cache.readQuery to add new or delete entries from the sub collections.
Any additional knowledge on this would be great.
Thanks!
graphql react-apollo aws-appsync
add a comment |
I have a schema that for ease of describing is as such
type level0 {
ID id
String name
[level1] level1s
}
type level1 {
ID id
String name
[level2] level2s
}
type level2 {
ID id
String name
}
type Query {
getLevel0(ID: id)
}
when I initially get my data I query build my query as such
query GetLevel0($id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
So at this point I now get a fully nested object hierarchy of my data so that I can eager load everything I need to quickly manage the data.
So now my question is when I go to manage my level2s collection for the top down binding this object hierarchy just flows without the need to create additional queries for direct access to the other information. I am also using the client InMemoryCache that I want to keep updated without additional network calls being made to return the full data over again.
Is there a way that I can build a schema to support filtering on a sub collection?
like for example
query GetLevel0($id: ID, $level1id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s(id: $level1id) {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
Looking to know if that would be a way to possible be able to preform the filter from the cache results when I do a cache.readQuery to add new or delete entries from the sub collections.
Any additional knowledge on this would be great.
Thanks!
graphql react-apollo aws-appsync
I have a schema that for ease of describing is as such
type level0 {
ID id
String name
[level1] level1s
}
type level1 {
ID id
String name
[level2] level2s
}
type level2 {
ID id
String name
}
type Query {
getLevel0(ID: id)
}
when I initially get my data I query build my query as such
query GetLevel0($id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
So at this point I now get a fully nested object hierarchy of my data so that I can eager load everything I need to quickly manage the data.
So now my question is when I go to manage my level2s collection for the top down binding this object hierarchy just flows without the need to create additional queries for direct access to the other information. I am also using the client InMemoryCache that I want to keep updated without additional network calls being made to return the full data over again.
Is there a way that I can build a schema to support filtering on a sub collection?
like for example
query GetLevel0($id: ID, $level1id: ID) {
getLevel0(id: $id) {
id
name
level1s(id: $level1id) {
id
name
level2s {
id
name
}
}
}
}
Looking to know if that would be a way to possible be able to preform the filter from the cache results when I do a cache.readQuery to add new or delete entries from the sub collections.
Any additional knowledge on this would be great.
Thanks!
graphql react-apollo aws-appsync
graphql react-apollo aws-appsync
edited Nov 14 '18 at 15:53
Palpatim
7,4642638
7,4642638
asked Nov 12 '18 at 18:17
Jason D
463
463
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267909%2fobject-with-an-array-of-arrays-with-client-side-cache%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267909%2fobject-with-an-array-of-arrays-with-client-side-cache%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown