INF World Rankings




The INF World Rankings are published by the International Netball Federation (INF) to make it possible to compare the relative strengths of internationally active national netball teams. Initially, rankings were based on the results from the World Netball Championships, and released after the conclusion of each event, every four years. A new ranking system was implemented on 11 February 2008, wherein teams are ranked based on international tests played, currently since July 2010. Teams appear on the rankings list once they have played eight international test matches, starting from July 2010. The rankings are updated by the INF every month. Australia and New Zealand have dominated the INF world rankings in previous years and they are the only two netball nations to have ever held the number one world ranking since its introduction in 2009.



Current world rankings





















































































































































































































































Full Rankings as of 2 December 2018[1]
Rank Change Team Rating
1
 Steady
 Australia
 211
2
Increase 1
 New Zealand
 173
3
Increase 1
 Jamaica
 172
4
Decrease 2
 England
 172
5
 Steady
 South Africa
 142
6
 Steady
 Malawi
 119
7
 Steady
 Uganda
 119
8
 Steady
 Northern Ireland
 111
9
 Steady
 Scotland
 111
10
 Steady
 Trinidad and Tobago
 107
11
 Steady
 Wales
 97
12
 Steady
 Barbados
 95
13
 Steady
 Zimbabwe
 84
14
 Steady
 Fiji
 83
15
 Steady
 Samoa
 81
16
Increase 1
 Zambia
 73
17
Decrease 1
 Cook Islands
 70
18
 Steady
 Papua New Guinea
 64
19
Increase 7
 Sri Lanka
 51
20
Decrease 1
 Ireland
 49
21
Decrease 1
 Eswatini
 45
22
Increase 1
 Grenada
 45
23
 NEW
 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
 44
24
Decrease 2
 Botswana
 38
25
Decrease 4
 Singapore
 37
26
Decrease 2
 Canada
 35
27
Decrease 2
 Malaysia
 31
28
Decrease 1
 Hong Kong
 21
29
 Steady
 Bermuda
 20
30
 Steady
 Tonga
 19
31
 Steady
 Gibraltar
 18
32
Decrease 4
 Namibia
 17
33
 NEW
 United States
 12
34
 NEW
 Thailand
 11
35
Decrease 3
 Sint Maarten
 1
36
Decrease 3
 Chinese Taipei
 0
37
Decrease 3
 Israel
 0
38
Decrease 3
  Switzerland
 0
39
 NEW
 Argentina
 0


Notes and references





  1. ^ INF. "Current World Rankings"..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}













-

Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Image
Florida Star v. B. J. F. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search United States Supreme Court case Florida Star v. B. J. F. Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 21, 1989 Decided June 21, 1989 Full case name The Florida Star v. B. J. F. Citations 491 U.S. 524 ( more ) 109 S. Ct. 2603; 105 L. Ed. 2d 443; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3120; 57 U.S.L.W. 4816; 16 Media L. Rep. 1801 Prior history The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 530 So.2d 286 (1988) Supreme Court of Florida; Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So.2d 883 (1986) Fla. Dist. Court of Appeals Holding Florida Stat. § 794.03 is unconstitutional to the extent it makes the truthful reporting of information that was a matter of public record unlawful, as it violates the First Amendment. Court membership Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr.  · Byron White Thurgood Marshall  · Harry Blac
Read more

Error while running script in elastic search , gateway timeout

Image
0 while running script in elastic search, I got 504 Gateway timeout error. { "query": { "bool": { "filter": { "script": { "script": " doc['creted_date'].date.getMonthOfYear() == 12 " } } } }, "aggs": { "test": { "date_histogram": { "field": "creted_date", "interval": "month", "format": "MMM" }, "aggs": { "cost": { "sum": { "field": "cost" } } }
Read more

Adding quotations to stringified JSON object values

Image
0 My stringified object data doesn't include quotation marks around object values, which errors when attempting JSON.parse() : '{ "affiliation": CORPORATE, "userId": 75c35d1c-5d12-4485-8fa8-b2f1551a3e6e }' I need the string to be: '{ "affiliation": "CORPORATE", "userId": "75c35d1c-5d12-4485-8fa8-b2f1551a3e6e" }' I'm using this regex to add quotes to the object keys: var newStr = str.replace(/(['"])?([a-z0-9A-Z_]+)(['"])?:/g, '"$2": '); For instance: '{ affiliation: CORPORATE }' to '{ "affiliation": CORPORATE }' There are only string values in my data, so I don't need to check value types. How can I alter my regex expression to add quotations to
Read more