Converting a defined structure into double (complex numbers) in c++
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Im trying to find my way around defining structures, and coded this to define a complex number. Ive already had success working with them, adding multiplying e.g., but I dont know how to get the absolute value of my complex number converted into a double, my compiler keeps telling me it doesnt know how to convert it, even though the complex struct is literally made of 2 doubles..
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
struct Complex_Number {
double re, im;
};
void print(const Complex_Number& w) //my print function for complex numbers
{
cout << '(' << w.re << " + i*" << w.im << ')';
}
double abs(const Complex_Number& z )
{
z = z.re + z.im;
abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return abs;
}
int main()
{
return 0;
}
c++ struct double complex-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Im trying to find my way around defining structures, and coded this to define a complex number. Ive already had success working with them, adding multiplying e.g., but I dont know how to get the absolute value of my complex number converted into a double, my compiler keeps telling me it doesnt know how to convert it, even though the complex struct is literally made of 2 doubles..
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
struct Complex_Number {
double re, im;
};
void print(const Complex_Number& w) //my print function for complex numbers
{
cout << '(' << w.re << " + i*" << w.im << ')';
}
double abs(const Complex_Number& z )
{
z = z.re + z.im;
abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return abs;
}
int main()
{
return 0;
}
c++ struct double complex-numbers
1
absis the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.
– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
Seestd::complex.
– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your localstd::complex<double>to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.
– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Im trying to find my way around defining structures, and coded this to define a complex number. Ive already had success working with them, adding multiplying e.g., but I dont know how to get the absolute value of my complex number converted into a double, my compiler keeps telling me it doesnt know how to convert it, even though the complex struct is literally made of 2 doubles..
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
struct Complex_Number {
double re, im;
};
void print(const Complex_Number& w) //my print function for complex numbers
{
cout << '(' << w.re << " + i*" << w.im << ')';
}
double abs(const Complex_Number& z )
{
z = z.re + z.im;
abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return abs;
}
int main()
{
return 0;
}
c++ struct double complex-numbers
Im trying to find my way around defining structures, and coded this to define a complex number. Ive already had success working with them, adding multiplying e.g., but I dont know how to get the absolute value of my complex number converted into a double, my compiler keeps telling me it doesnt know how to convert it, even though the complex struct is literally made of 2 doubles..
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
struct Complex_Number {
double re, im;
};
void print(const Complex_Number& w) //my print function for complex numbers
{
cout << '(' << w.re << " + i*" << w.im << ')';
}
double abs(const Complex_Number& z )
{
z = z.re + z.im;
abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return abs;
}
int main()
{
return 0;
}
c++ struct double complex-numbers
c++ struct double complex-numbers
asked Nov 11 at 19:39
Henryk5161
43
43
1
absis the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.
– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
Seestd::complex.
– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your localstd::complex<double>to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.
– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44
add a comment |
1
absis the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.
– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
Seestd::complex.
– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your localstd::complex<double>to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.
– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44
1
1
abs is the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
abs is the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
See
std::complex.– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
See
std::complex.– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your local
std::complex<double> to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your local
std::complex<double> to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't know what you intend with z = z.re + z.im; The second part just needs to be assigned to a variable or returned directly. So write...
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
double ret = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return ret;
}
or
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
return sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
}
Assigning something to the "function name" as in your code, i.e. abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im)), is not valid C++ code.
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252484%2fconverting-a-defined-structure-into-double-complex-numbers-in-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't know what you intend with z = z.re + z.im; The second part just needs to be assigned to a variable or returned directly. So write...
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
double ret = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return ret;
}
or
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
return sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
}
Assigning something to the "function name" as in your code, i.e. abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im)), is not valid C++ code.
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't know what you intend with z = z.re + z.im; The second part just needs to be assigned to a variable or returned directly. So write...
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
double ret = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return ret;
}
or
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
return sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
}
Assigning something to the "function name" as in your code, i.e. abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im)), is not valid C++ code.
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I don't know what you intend with z = z.re + z.im; The second part just needs to be assigned to a variable or returned directly. So write...
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
double ret = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return ret;
}
or
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
return sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
}
Assigning something to the "function name" as in your code, i.e. abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im)), is not valid C++ code.
I don't know what you intend with z = z.re + z.im; The second part just needs to be assigned to a variable or returned directly. So write...
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
double ret = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
return ret;
}
or
double abs(const Complex_Number& z ) {
return sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im));
}
Assigning something to the "function name" as in your code, i.e. abs = sqrt((z.re*z.re)+(z.im*z.im)), is not valid C++ code.
answered Nov 11 at 19:44
Stephan Lechner
25.3k21839
25.3k21839
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
add a comment |
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
1
1
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
Whoah thanks for that.. i have spent too much time today that i literally blocked myself from seeing this obvious one.. i really appreciate your help!
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 19:51
1
1
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
Was just waiting for the option to be enabled, thx :)
– Henryk5161
Nov 11 at 20:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252484%2fconverting-a-defined-structure-into-double-complex-numbers-in-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
absis the name of the function - i.e. a function pointer - you need to create a double variable.– Neil Butterworth
Nov 11 at 19:42
See
std::complex.– Thomas Matthews
Nov 11 at 20:22
As @ThomasMatthews mentions, you should check out your local
std::complex<double>to see how the interfaces can be defined by your standard library.– Bo R
Nov 11 at 20:44