How to revert to previous commit in CVS
For legacy reasons, I'm using CVS on a project. Recently I committed some changes which broke our code and I needed to revert them. What's CVS's analog of git revert -r <old_revision>
?
Looking at past questions like How to revert big change, CVS commits don't group the files that were changed. Is the only way to revert by using dates?
Also, what's the best way to view past changes? CVS log outputs too much info, most of which is unnecessary. I want to see commit messages and changed files.
cvs legacy
add a comment |
For legacy reasons, I'm using CVS on a project. Recently I committed some changes which broke our code and I needed to revert them. What's CVS's analog of git revert -r <old_revision>
?
Looking at past questions like How to revert big change, CVS commits don't group the files that were changed. Is the only way to revert by using dates?
Also, what's the best way to view past changes? CVS log outputs too much info, most of which is unnecessary. I want to see commit messages and changed files.
cvs legacy
4
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23
add a comment |
For legacy reasons, I'm using CVS on a project. Recently I committed some changes which broke our code and I needed to revert them. What's CVS's analog of git revert -r <old_revision>
?
Looking at past questions like How to revert big change, CVS commits don't group the files that were changed. Is the only way to revert by using dates?
Also, what's the best way to view past changes? CVS log outputs too much info, most of which is unnecessary. I want to see commit messages and changed files.
cvs legacy
For legacy reasons, I'm using CVS on a project. Recently I committed some changes which broke our code and I needed to revert them. What's CVS's analog of git revert -r <old_revision>
?
Looking at past questions like How to revert big change, CVS commits don't group the files that were changed. Is the only way to revert by using dates?
Also, what's the best way to view past changes? CVS log outputs too much info, most of which is unnecessary. I want to see commit messages and changed files.
cvs legacy
cvs legacy
edited May 23 '17 at 12:09
Community♦
11
11
asked Feb 5 '12 at 23:12
Fiona TFiona T
1,59611217
1,59611217
4
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23
add a comment |
4
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23
4
4
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
CVS documentation can be found here, but from this site it tells how to revert a single file:
MAKING THE OLD VERSION THE CURRENT VERSION
Save the version of "oldfile" to something else and check out the "current" version.
Note: you must still to do update -A to get the current version, because even though you have > renamed
"oldfile" the tag is still associated with the file "oldfile" and is not removed till > update -A is done.
Then rename the "old" version to the "current" version.
% mv oldfile oldfile.old.ver
% cvs update -A oldfile
% mv oldfile.old.ver oldfile
% cvs commit -m "reverting to version 1.5" oldfile
You can now carry on checking out, editing and commiting the file as normal.
This won't handle many files in a recursive fashion, but hopefully helps.
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
add a comment |
To back out a revision of a single file, use cvs admin -o
.
See the CVS documentation (info cvs
if you're on a Unix-like system) for details, or see this link.
Quoting from the manual:
`-oRANGE'
Deletes ("outdates") the revisions given by RANGE.
Note that this command can be quite dangerous unless you know
_exactly_ what you are doing (for example see the warnings below
about how the REV1:REV2 syntax is confusing).
If you are short on disc this option might help you. But think
twice before using it--there is no way short of restoring the
latest backup to undo this command! If you delete different
revisions than you planned, either due to carelessness or (heaven
forbid) a CVS bug, there is no opportunity to correct the error
before the revisions are deleted. It probably would be a good
idea to experiment on a copy of the repository first.
It then gives a number of ways to specify a revision, or a range of revisions, to delete.
As it says, this can be quite dangerous; it erases information from the repository, which is usually exactly what any revision control system tries to prevent.
If you don't need to change history like this, just grab a copy of the older version and check it in on top of the bad revision, as Dave M's answer suggests.
And you're right, CVS's emphasis is on individual files; more modern systems tend to emphasize the state of the entire repository.
So far, all of this only lets you process one file at a time.
But you could check out an entire module as of a specified date into a separate directory (cvs checkout -D date
), then copy the files over your current copy of the module, and check everything in. If you do this, be sure to do a "cvs diff" so you know exactly what changes you're making.
I don't know of a good way to get more concise log information. cvs log
with no arguments gives you a log for each file, not in chronological order. cvs log filename
gives you a log for a specified file, but doesn't relate it to other files that may have been modified at the same time. Personally, I might consider writing a Perl script that gathers the information printed by cvs log
and rearranges it for display, but that's probably more work than you're interested in doing.
There are tools to import CVS repositories into something more modern.
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
Here are commands.
1) false commit happen
2) check its latest version.
cvs log file.txt
lets say 1.25 is the latest version due to false commit so we want to revert back to its older version 1.24.
3) So lets go ahead as below way.
cvs update -r 1.24 file.txt // checkout older version
cp file.txt old.txt // create backup
cvs update -A file.txt // again move to latest one
cp old.txt file.txt // replace old to at latest one.
cvs status file.txt // It will shows as locally modified.
cvs commit -m "Reverting false commit" file.txt
cvs log file.txt // new 1.26 will be created.
4) Just to ensure lets diff that 1.26 and 1.24 are the same one.
cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.24 file.txt
If all above steps are correct then diff will show no difference.
add a comment |
With two -j options, CVS will merge in the changes between the two respective revisions.
Example:
If the file @file{foo.c} is based on revision 1.6 and you want to remove the changes made between 1.3 and 1.5, you might do:
$ cvs update -j1.5 -j1.3 foo.c # note the order...
add a comment |
As well as reverting by date you could revert by tag, if the set of files you want to go back to is tagged.
I had what I think is a similar situation and I did the following which affected the whole folder rather than file-by-file:
- cvs export the 'old version' by tag (or you could do it by date) into a new folder
- ensure the 'current version' is checked out, updated, and live
- copy the files from the old version into the folder with the current version
- commit the result with a suitable comment
This approach will need modification if any files have been added/removed between the old version and the current version.
The CVS history will show the reversion.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9153984%2fhow-to-revert-to-previous-commit-in-cvs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
CVS documentation can be found here, but from this site it tells how to revert a single file:
MAKING THE OLD VERSION THE CURRENT VERSION
Save the version of "oldfile" to something else and check out the "current" version.
Note: you must still to do update -A to get the current version, because even though you have > renamed
"oldfile" the tag is still associated with the file "oldfile" and is not removed till > update -A is done.
Then rename the "old" version to the "current" version.
% mv oldfile oldfile.old.ver
% cvs update -A oldfile
% mv oldfile.old.ver oldfile
% cvs commit -m "reverting to version 1.5" oldfile
You can now carry on checking out, editing and commiting the file as normal.
This won't handle many files in a recursive fashion, but hopefully helps.
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
add a comment |
CVS documentation can be found here, but from this site it tells how to revert a single file:
MAKING THE OLD VERSION THE CURRENT VERSION
Save the version of "oldfile" to something else and check out the "current" version.
Note: you must still to do update -A to get the current version, because even though you have > renamed
"oldfile" the tag is still associated with the file "oldfile" and is not removed till > update -A is done.
Then rename the "old" version to the "current" version.
% mv oldfile oldfile.old.ver
% cvs update -A oldfile
% mv oldfile.old.ver oldfile
% cvs commit -m "reverting to version 1.5" oldfile
You can now carry on checking out, editing and commiting the file as normal.
This won't handle many files in a recursive fashion, but hopefully helps.
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
add a comment |
CVS documentation can be found here, but from this site it tells how to revert a single file:
MAKING THE OLD VERSION THE CURRENT VERSION
Save the version of "oldfile" to something else and check out the "current" version.
Note: you must still to do update -A to get the current version, because even though you have > renamed
"oldfile" the tag is still associated with the file "oldfile" and is not removed till > update -A is done.
Then rename the "old" version to the "current" version.
% mv oldfile oldfile.old.ver
% cvs update -A oldfile
% mv oldfile.old.ver oldfile
% cvs commit -m "reverting to version 1.5" oldfile
You can now carry on checking out, editing and commiting the file as normal.
This won't handle many files in a recursive fashion, but hopefully helps.
CVS documentation can be found here, but from this site it tells how to revert a single file:
MAKING THE OLD VERSION THE CURRENT VERSION
Save the version of "oldfile" to something else and check out the "current" version.
Note: you must still to do update -A to get the current version, because even though you have > renamed
"oldfile" the tag is still associated with the file "oldfile" and is not removed till > update -A is done.
Then rename the "old" version to the "current" version.
% mv oldfile oldfile.old.ver
% cvs update -A oldfile
% mv oldfile.old.ver oldfile
% cvs commit -m "reverting to version 1.5" oldfile
You can now carry on checking out, editing and commiting the file as normal.
This won't handle many files in a recursive fashion, but hopefully helps.
edited Feb 5 '12 at 23:38
answered Feb 5 '12 at 23:32
Dave MDave M
1,21611626
1,21611626
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
add a comment |
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
6
6
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
Hi Dave, thanks for the answer. I ended up using cvs update -j <current rev> -j <old rev> <filename> to revert, do you know what the difference between these methods are?
– Fiona T
Feb 6 '12 at 2:49
1
1
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
@FionaT, they're effectively the same. The method described in my answer just replaces the working copy with the old revision which you then commit as the next revision. Using the 'join' method, CVS does the work for you by comparing the two revisions and creating a patch that captures the differences between the two revisions and then applies it to the local file. Note (I'm sure you know) that you still have to commit the local file after using the 'join method you used.
– Dave M
Feb 6 '12 at 3:26
add a comment |
To back out a revision of a single file, use cvs admin -o
.
See the CVS documentation (info cvs
if you're on a Unix-like system) for details, or see this link.
Quoting from the manual:
`-oRANGE'
Deletes ("outdates") the revisions given by RANGE.
Note that this command can be quite dangerous unless you know
_exactly_ what you are doing (for example see the warnings below
about how the REV1:REV2 syntax is confusing).
If you are short on disc this option might help you. But think
twice before using it--there is no way short of restoring the
latest backup to undo this command! If you delete different
revisions than you planned, either due to carelessness or (heaven
forbid) a CVS bug, there is no opportunity to correct the error
before the revisions are deleted. It probably would be a good
idea to experiment on a copy of the repository first.
It then gives a number of ways to specify a revision, or a range of revisions, to delete.
As it says, this can be quite dangerous; it erases information from the repository, which is usually exactly what any revision control system tries to prevent.
If you don't need to change history like this, just grab a copy of the older version and check it in on top of the bad revision, as Dave M's answer suggests.
And you're right, CVS's emphasis is on individual files; more modern systems tend to emphasize the state of the entire repository.
So far, all of this only lets you process one file at a time.
But you could check out an entire module as of a specified date into a separate directory (cvs checkout -D date
), then copy the files over your current copy of the module, and check everything in. If you do this, be sure to do a "cvs diff" so you know exactly what changes you're making.
I don't know of a good way to get more concise log information. cvs log
with no arguments gives you a log for each file, not in chronological order. cvs log filename
gives you a log for a specified file, but doesn't relate it to other files that may have been modified at the same time. Personally, I might consider writing a Perl script that gathers the information printed by cvs log
and rearranges it for display, but that's probably more work than you're interested in doing.
There are tools to import CVS repositories into something more modern.
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
To back out a revision of a single file, use cvs admin -o
.
See the CVS documentation (info cvs
if you're on a Unix-like system) for details, or see this link.
Quoting from the manual:
`-oRANGE'
Deletes ("outdates") the revisions given by RANGE.
Note that this command can be quite dangerous unless you know
_exactly_ what you are doing (for example see the warnings below
about how the REV1:REV2 syntax is confusing).
If you are short on disc this option might help you. But think
twice before using it--there is no way short of restoring the
latest backup to undo this command! If you delete different
revisions than you planned, either due to carelessness or (heaven
forbid) a CVS bug, there is no opportunity to correct the error
before the revisions are deleted. It probably would be a good
idea to experiment on a copy of the repository first.
It then gives a number of ways to specify a revision, or a range of revisions, to delete.
As it says, this can be quite dangerous; it erases information from the repository, which is usually exactly what any revision control system tries to prevent.
If you don't need to change history like this, just grab a copy of the older version and check it in on top of the bad revision, as Dave M's answer suggests.
And you're right, CVS's emphasis is on individual files; more modern systems tend to emphasize the state of the entire repository.
So far, all of this only lets you process one file at a time.
But you could check out an entire module as of a specified date into a separate directory (cvs checkout -D date
), then copy the files over your current copy of the module, and check everything in. If you do this, be sure to do a "cvs diff" so you know exactly what changes you're making.
I don't know of a good way to get more concise log information. cvs log
with no arguments gives you a log for each file, not in chronological order. cvs log filename
gives you a log for a specified file, but doesn't relate it to other files that may have been modified at the same time. Personally, I might consider writing a Perl script that gathers the information printed by cvs log
and rearranges it for display, but that's probably more work than you're interested in doing.
There are tools to import CVS repositories into something more modern.
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
To back out a revision of a single file, use cvs admin -o
.
See the CVS documentation (info cvs
if you're on a Unix-like system) for details, or see this link.
Quoting from the manual:
`-oRANGE'
Deletes ("outdates") the revisions given by RANGE.
Note that this command can be quite dangerous unless you know
_exactly_ what you are doing (for example see the warnings below
about how the REV1:REV2 syntax is confusing).
If you are short on disc this option might help you. But think
twice before using it--there is no way short of restoring the
latest backup to undo this command! If you delete different
revisions than you planned, either due to carelessness or (heaven
forbid) a CVS bug, there is no opportunity to correct the error
before the revisions are deleted. It probably would be a good
idea to experiment on a copy of the repository first.
It then gives a number of ways to specify a revision, or a range of revisions, to delete.
As it says, this can be quite dangerous; it erases information from the repository, which is usually exactly what any revision control system tries to prevent.
If you don't need to change history like this, just grab a copy of the older version and check it in on top of the bad revision, as Dave M's answer suggests.
And you're right, CVS's emphasis is on individual files; more modern systems tend to emphasize the state of the entire repository.
So far, all of this only lets you process one file at a time.
But you could check out an entire module as of a specified date into a separate directory (cvs checkout -D date
), then copy the files over your current copy of the module, and check everything in. If you do this, be sure to do a "cvs diff" so you know exactly what changes you're making.
I don't know of a good way to get more concise log information. cvs log
with no arguments gives you a log for each file, not in chronological order. cvs log filename
gives you a log for a specified file, but doesn't relate it to other files that may have been modified at the same time. Personally, I might consider writing a Perl script that gathers the information printed by cvs log
and rearranges it for display, but that's probably more work than you're interested in doing.
There are tools to import CVS repositories into something more modern.
To back out a revision of a single file, use cvs admin -o
.
See the CVS documentation (info cvs
if you're on a Unix-like system) for details, or see this link.
Quoting from the manual:
`-oRANGE'
Deletes ("outdates") the revisions given by RANGE.
Note that this command can be quite dangerous unless you know
_exactly_ what you are doing (for example see the warnings below
about how the REV1:REV2 syntax is confusing).
If you are short on disc this option might help you. But think
twice before using it--there is no way short of restoring the
latest backup to undo this command! If you delete different
revisions than you planned, either due to carelessness or (heaven
forbid) a CVS bug, there is no opportunity to correct the error
before the revisions are deleted. It probably would be a good
idea to experiment on a copy of the repository first.
It then gives a number of ways to specify a revision, or a range of revisions, to delete.
As it says, this can be quite dangerous; it erases information from the repository, which is usually exactly what any revision control system tries to prevent.
If you don't need to change history like this, just grab a copy of the older version and check it in on top of the bad revision, as Dave M's answer suggests.
And you're right, CVS's emphasis is on individual files; more modern systems tend to emphasize the state of the entire repository.
So far, all of this only lets you process one file at a time.
But you could check out an entire module as of a specified date into a separate directory (cvs checkout -D date
), then copy the files over your current copy of the module, and check everything in. If you do this, be sure to do a "cvs diff" so you know exactly what changes you're making.
I don't know of a good way to get more concise log information. cvs log
with no arguments gives you a log for each file, not in chronological order. cvs log filename
gives you a log for a specified file, but doesn't relate it to other files that may have been modified at the same time. Personally, I might consider writing a Perl script that gathers the information printed by cvs log
and rearranges it for display, but that's probably more work than you're interested in doing.
There are tools to import CVS repositories into something more modern.
answered Feb 5 '12 at 23:40
Keith ThompsonKeith Thompson
194k26290484
194k26290484
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
1
1
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
Oh, I didn't know about deleting a subset of revisions. It does sound dangerous especially since I don't own the repository. Could be interesting to play with, though! Do you know if people use it much in practice?
– Fiona T
Feb 9 '12 at 20:59
add a comment |
Here are commands.
1) false commit happen
2) check its latest version.
cvs log file.txt
lets say 1.25 is the latest version due to false commit so we want to revert back to its older version 1.24.
3) So lets go ahead as below way.
cvs update -r 1.24 file.txt // checkout older version
cp file.txt old.txt // create backup
cvs update -A file.txt // again move to latest one
cp old.txt file.txt // replace old to at latest one.
cvs status file.txt // It will shows as locally modified.
cvs commit -m "Reverting false commit" file.txt
cvs log file.txt // new 1.26 will be created.
4) Just to ensure lets diff that 1.26 and 1.24 are the same one.
cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.24 file.txt
If all above steps are correct then diff will show no difference.
add a comment |
Here are commands.
1) false commit happen
2) check its latest version.
cvs log file.txt
lets say 1.25 is the latest version due to false commit so we want to revert back to its older version 1.24.
3) So lets go ahead as below way.
cvs update -r 1.24 file.txt // checkout older version
cp file.txt old.txt // create backup
cvs update -A file.txt // again move to latest one
cp old.txt file.txt // replace old to at latest one.
cvs status file.txt // It will shows as locally modified.
cvs commit -m "Reverting false commit" file.txt
cvs log file.txt // new 1.26 will be created.
4) Just to ensure lets diff that 1.26 and 1.24 are the same one.
cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.24 file.txt
If all above steps are correct then diff will show no difference.
add a comment |
Here are commands.
1) false commit happen
2) check its latest version.
cvs log file.txt
lets say 1.25 is the latest version due to false commit so we want to revert back to its older version 1.24.
3) So lets go ahead as below way.
cvs update -r 1.24 file.txt // checkout older version
cp file.txt old.txt // create backup
cvs update -A file.txt // again move to latest one
cp old.txt file.txt // replace old to at latest one.
cvs status file.txt // It will shows as locally modified.
cvs commit -m "Reverting false commit" file.txt
cvs log file.txt // new 1.26 will be created.
4) Just to ensure lets diff that 1.26 and 1.24 are the same one.
cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.24 file.txt
If all above steps are correct then diff will show no difference.
Here are commands.
1) false commit happen
2) check its latest version.
cvs log file.txt
lets say 1.25 is the latest version due to false commit so we want to revert back to its older version 1.24.
3) So lets go ahead as below way.
cvs update -r 1.24 file.txt // checkout older version
cp file.txt old.txt // create backup
cvs update -A file.txt // again move to latest one
cp old.txt file.txt // replace old to at latest one.
cvs status file.txt // It will shows as locally modified.
cvs commit -m "Reverting false commit" file.txt
cvs log file.txt // new 1.26 will be created.
4) Just to ensure lets diff that 1.26 and 1.24 are the same one.
cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.24 file.txt
If all above steps are correct then diff will show no difference.
answered Dec 7 '16 at 6:43
Jeegar PatelJeegar Patel
14.1k34119179
14.1k34119179
add a comment |
add a comment |
With two -j options, CVS will merge in the changes between the two respective revisions.
Example:
If the file @file{foo.c} is based on revision 1.6 and you want to remove the changes made between 1.3 and 1.5, you might do:
$ cvs update -j1.5 -j1.3 foo.c # note the order...
add a comment |
With two -j options, CVS will merge in the changes between the two respective revisions.
Example:
If the file @file{foo.c} is based on revision 1.6 and you want to remove the changes made between 1.3 and 1.5, you might do:
$ cvs update -j1.5 -j1.3 foo.c # note the order...
add a comment |
With two -j options, CVS will merge in the changes between the two respective revisions.
Example:
If the file @file{foo.c} is based on revision 1.6 and you want to remove the changes made between 1.3 and 1.5, you might do:
$ cvs update -j1.5 -j1.3 foo.c # note the order...
With two -j options, CVS will merge in the changes between the two respective revisions.
Example:
If the file @file{foo.c} is based on revision 1.6 and you want to remove the changes made between 1.3 and 1.5, you might do:
$ cvs update -j1.5 -j1.3 foo.c # note the order...
edited Nov 16 '18 at 9:23
answered Apr 26 '17 at 10:25
Vijay ShettyVijay Shetty
583510
583510
add a comment |
add a comment |
As well as reverting by date you could revert by tag, if the set of files you want to go back to is tagged.
I had what I think is a similar situation and I did the following which affected the whole folder rather than file-by-file:
- cvs export the 'old version' by tag (or you could do it by date) into a new folder
- ensure the 'current version' is checked out, updated, and live
- copy the files from the old version into the folder with the current version
- commit the result with a suitable comment
This approach will need modification if any files have been added/removed between the old version and the current version.
The CVS history will show the reversion.
add a comment |
As well as reverting by date you could revert by tag, if the set of files you want to go back to is tagged.
I had what I think is a similar situation and I did the following which affected the whole folder rather than file-by-file:
- cvs export the 'old version' by tag (or you could do it by date) into a new folder
- ensure the 'current version' is checked out, updated, and live
- copy the files from the old version into the folder with the current version
- commit the result with a suitable comment
This approach will need modification if any files have been added/removed between the old version and the current version.
The CVS history will show the reversion.
add a comment |
As well as reverting by date you could revert by tag, if the set of files you want to go back to is tagged.
I had what I think is a similar situation and I did the following which affected the whole folder rather than file-by-file:
- cvs export the 'old version' by tag (or you could do it by date) into a new folder
- ensure the 'current version' is checked out, updated, and live
- copy the files from the old version into the folder with the current version
- commit the result with a suitable comment
This approach will need modification if any files have been added/removed between the old version and the current version.
The CVS history will show the reversion.
As well as reverting by date you could revert by tag, if the set of files you want to go back to is tagged.
I had what I think is a similar situation and I did the following which affected the whole folder rather than file-by-file:
- cvs export the 'old version' by tag (or you could do it by date) into a new folder
- ensure the 'current version' is checked out, updated, and live
- copy the files from the old version into the folder with the current version
- commit the result with a suitable comment
This approach will need modification if any files have been added/removed between the old version and the current version.
The CVS history will show the reversion.
answered Aug 20 '15 at 15:28
sparklewhiskerssparklewhiskers
696617
696617
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9153984%2fhow-to-revert-to-previous-commit-in-cvs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
+1. Good question. Welcome to SO.
– Joseph Quinsey
Feb 5 '12 at 23:23