Instancing the Application class in Unit Tests
I am attempting to write Unit Tests on an Android project, but have run into a roadblock with creating an instance of the Application class. The project uses Retrofit and LiveData with Android Architecture Components.
Currently, I am trying to test my AuthRepository 's login function, but I can't create an instance of the repository because it is dependent on a custom SharedPrefs class which is dependent on a Application class.
AuthRepository
@Singleton
class AuthRepository @Inject constructor(
val retrofitService: RetrofitService,
val sessionData: SharedPrefs
) {
fun login(username: String, password: String): LiveData<LoginResponse> {
return getCSRF().then {
if (it.result is GenericResponse.ErrorType) {
// Error Accepting Terms
val mutableLiveData = MutableLiveData<LoginResponse>()
mutableLiveData.value = LoginResponse(listOf(LoginResponse.ErrorType.Generic()))
mutableLiveData
}
else {
retrofitService.postLogin(LoginBody(username, password))
.map {
val res = LoginRemote.parseResponse(it.response)
return res
}
}
}
}
}
SharedPrefs
class SharedPrefs @Inject constructor(context: Application) {
private val sharedPrefs = context.getSharedPreferences("com.company.project.domain.PREFERENCE_FILE_KEY", Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
private val PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE = "sessionCookie"
// SharedPreference Variable Management
var sessionCookie: String
get() = sharedPrefs.getString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, "")
set(value) = saveString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, value)
}
With this set up this way, is it possible for me to run plain old UnitTests for my AuthRepository? Or is the dependency on Application going to force me to use Instrumentation Tests in order to test my AuthRepository?
unit-testing kotlin retrofit android-testing
add a comment |
I am attempting to write Unit Tests on an Android project, but have run into a roadblock with creating an instance of the Application class. The project uses Retrofit and LiveData with Android Architecture Components.
Currently, I am trying to test my AuthRepository 's login function, but I can't create an instance of the repository because it is dependent on a custom SharedPrefs class which is dependent on a Application class.
AuthRepository
@Singleton
class AuthRepository @Inject constructor(
val retrofitService: RetrofitService,
val sessionData: SharedPrefs
) {
fun login(username: String, password: String): LiveData<LoginResponse> {
return getCSRF().then {
if (it.result is GenericResponse.ErrorType) {
// Error Accepting Terms
val mutableLiveData = MutableLiveData<LoginResponse>()
mutableLiveData.value = LoginResponse(listOf(LoginResponse.ErrorType.Generic()))
mutableLiveData
}
else {
retrofitService.postLogin(LoginBody(username, password))
.map {
val res = LoginRemote.parseResponse(it.response)
return res
}
}
}
}
}
SharedPrefs
class SharedPrefs @Inject constructor(context: Application) {
private val sharedPrefs = context.getSharedPreferences("com.company.project.domain.PREFERENCE_FILE_KEY", Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
private val PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE = "sessionCookie"
// SharedPreference Variable Management
var sessionCookie: String
get() = sharedPrefs.getString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, "")
set(value) = saveString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, value)
}
With this set up this way, is it possible for me to run plain old UnitTests for my AuthRepository? Or is the dependency on Application going to force me to use Instrumentation Tests in order to test my AuthRepository?
unit-testing kotlin retrofit android-testing
add a comment |
I am attempting to write Unit Tests on an Android project, but have run into a roadblock with creating an instance of the Application class. The project uses Retrofit and LiveData with Android Architecture Components.
Currently, I am trying to test my AuthRepository 's login function, but I can't create an instance of the repository because it is dependent on a custom SharedPrefs class which is dependent on a Application class.
AuthRepository
@Singleton
class AuthRepository @Inject constructor(
val retrofitService: RetrofitService,
val sessionData: SharedPrefs
) {
fun login(username: String, password: String): LiveData<LoginResponse> {
return getCSRF().then {
if (it.result is GenericResponse.ErrorType) {
// Error Accepting Terms
val mutableLiveData = MutableLiveData<LoginResponse>()
mutableLiveData.value = LoginResponse(listOf(LoginResponse.ErrorType.Generic()))
mutableLiveData
}
else {
retrofitService.postLogin(LoginBody(username, password))
.map {
val res = LoginRemote.parseResponse(it.response)
return res
}
}
}
}
}
SharedPrefs
class SharedPrefs @Inject constructor(context: Application) {
private val sharedPrefs = context.getSharedPreferences("com.company.project.domain.PREFERENCE_FILE_KEY", Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
private val PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE = "sessionCookie"
// SharedPreference Variable Management
var sessionCookie: String
get() = sharedPrefs.getString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, "")
set(value) = saveString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, value)
}
With this set up this way, is it possible for me to run plain old UnitTests for my AuthRepository? Or is the dependency on Application going to force me to use Instrumentation Tests in order to test my AuthRepository?
unit-testing kotlin retrofit android-testing
I am attempting to write Unit Tests on an Android project, but have run into a roadblock with creating an instance of the Application class. The project uses Retrofit and LiveData with Android Architecture Components.
Currently, I am trying to test my AuthRepository 's login function, but I can't create an instance of the repository because it is dependent on a custom SharedPrefs class which is dependent on a Application class.
AuthRepository
@Singleton
class AuthRepository @Inject constructor(
val retrofitService: RetrofitService,
val sessionData: SharedPrefs
) {
fun login(username: String, password: String): LiveData<LoginResponse> {
return getCSRF().then {
if (it.result is GenericResponse.ErrorType) {
// Error Accepting Terms
val mutableLiveData = MutableLiveData<LoginResponse>()
mutableLiveData.value = LoginResponse(listOf(LoginResponse.ErrorType.Generic()))
mutableLiveData
}
else {
retrofitService.postLogin(LoginBody(username, password))
.map {
val res = LoginRemote.parseResponse(it.response)
return res
}
}
}
}
}
SharedPrefs
class SharedPrefs @Inject constructor(context: Application) {
private val sharedPrefs = context.getSharedPreferences("com.company.project.domain.PREFERENCE_FILE_KEY", Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
private val PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE = "sessionCookie"
// SharedPreference Variable Management
var sessionCookie: String
get() = sharedPrefs.getString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, "")
set(value) = saveString(PREF_KEY_SESSION_COOKIE, value)
}
With this set up this way, is it possible for me to run plain old UnitTests for my AuthRepository? Or is the dependency on Application going to force me to use Instrumentation Tests in order to test my AuthRepository?
unit-testing kotlin retrofit android-testing
unit-testing kotlin retrofit android-testing
asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:28
BlondeSwanBlondeSwan
1319
1319
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1.You can mock Application
class using Mockito:
@Mock private lateinit var context: Application
@Before fun setupTasksViewModel() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this)
}
or mock
SharedPrefs
object
@Mock private lateinit var prefs: SharedPrefs
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how toobserve
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324936%2finstancing-the-application-class-in-unit-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1.You can mock Application
class using Mockito:
@Mock private lateinit var context: Application
@Before fun setupTasksViewModel() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this)
}
or mock
SharedPrefs
object
@Mock private lateinit var prefs: SharedPrefs
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how toobserve
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
|
show 3 more comments
1.You can mock Application
class using Mockito:
@Mock private lateinit var context: Application
@Before fun setupTasksViewModel() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this)
}
or mock
SharedPrefs
object
@Mock private lateinit var prefs: SharedPrefs
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how toobserve
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
|
show 3 more comments
1.You can mock Application
class using Mockito:
@Mock private lateinit var context: Application
@Before fun setupTasksViewModel() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this)
}
or mock
SharedPrefs
object
@Mock private lateinit var prefs: SharedPrefs
1.You can mock Application
class using Mockito:
@Mock private lateinit var context: Application
@Before fun setupTasksViewModel() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this)
}
or mock
SharedPrefs
object
@Mock private lateinit var prefs: SharedPrefs
answered Nov 15 '18 at 17:34
SergeySergey
4,21421835
4,21421835
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how toobserve
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how toobserve
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how to
observe
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
Thanks! Since you have been able to answer a lot of my questions, would you mind if we started a private chat? Now that I have that, I need to figure out how to
observe
the response which requires an instance of LifeCycleOwner– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 17:48
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
sure, lets figure out that together
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 17:54
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
Great, what's the best way to open a chat?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:01
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I thought you know :)
– Sergey
Nov 15 '18 at 18:10
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
I was going to contact you through your linked in profile, but it's not valid?
– BlondeSwan
Nov 15 '18 at 18:12
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324936%2finstancing-the-application-class-in-unit-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown