Defining relative routing in Angular











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Update



I changed forRoot with forChild according to the answers.



So, basically I have to issues, let this be a submodule,



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
ARoutingModule,
BModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class AModule { }


and



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
BRoutingModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class BModule { }


So AModule is being imported by the root module and both modules, AModule and BModule shall define their own routes, something like



// ./A/A-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'A',//<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A
component: AComponent
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class ARoutingModule { }


and in SubSub I have



// ./A/B/B-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'B', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A/B
component: BComponent,

]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class BRoutingModule { }


Is this possible? When using a path printing, I can get the sub-routes, but not the subsub routes (i.e. B). And can I define the routes in B without knowing the path before that? so define B without knowing A



www.site.com/something/else


define routes for else without knowing something?



Here is a stackblitz example, main works, but the Subs don't...










share|improve this question
























  • RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
    – Sachin Gupta
    Nov 10 at 16:56















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Update



I changed forRoot with forChild according to the answers.



So, basically I have to issues, let this be a submodule,



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
ARoutingModule,
BModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class AModule { }


and



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
BRoutingModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class BModule { }


So AModule is being imported by the root module and both modules, AModule and BModule shall define their own routes, something like



// ./A/A-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'A',//<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A
component: AComponent
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class ARoutingModule { }


and in SubSub I have



// ./A/B/B-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'B', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A/B
component: BComponent,

]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class BRoutingModule { }


Is this possible? When using a path printing, I can get the sub-routes, but not the subsub routes (i.e. B). And can I define the routes in B without knowing the path before that? so define B without knowing A



www.site.com/something/else


define routes for else without knowing something?



Here is a stackblitz example, main works, but the Subs don't...










share|improve this question
























  • RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
    – Sachin Gupta
    Nov 10 at 16:56













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Update



I changed forRoot with forChild according to the answers.



So, basically I have to issues, let this be a submodule,



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
ARoutingModule,
BModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class AModule { }


and



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
BRoutingModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class BModule { }


So AModule is being imported by the root module and both modules, AModule and BModule shall define their own routes, something like



// ./A/A-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'A',//<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A
component: AComponent
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class ARoutingModule { }


and in SubSub I have



// ./A/B/B-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'B', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A/B
component: BComponent,

]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class BRoutingModule { }


Is this possible? When using a path printing, I can get the sub-routes, but not the subsub routes (i.e. B). And can I define the routes in B without knowing the path before that? so define B without knowing A



www.site.com/something/else


define routes for else without knowing something?



Here is a stackblitz example, main works, but the Subs don't...










share|improve this question















Update



I changed forRoot with forChild according to the answers.



So, basically I have to issues, let this be a submodule,



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
ARoutingModule,
BModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class AModule { }


and



@NgModule({
imports: [
CommonModule,
BRoutingModule
],
declarations: [AppsComponent, ...],
exports: [
AppsComponent, ...
]
})
export class BModule { }


So AModule is being imported by the root module and both modules, AModule and BModule shall define their own routes, something like



// ./A/A-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'A',//<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A
component: AComponent
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class ARoutingModule { }


and in SubSub I have



// ./A/B/B-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'B', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/A/B
component: BComponent,

]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)],
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class BRoutingModule { }


Is this possible? When using a path printing, I can get the sub-routes, but not the subsub routes (i.e. B). And can I define the routes in B without knowing the path before that? so define B without knowing A



www.site.com/something/else


define routes for else without knowing something?



Here is a stackblitz example, main works, but the Subs don't...







angular typescript routes






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 10 at 17:52

























asked Nov 10 at 16:26









rst

1,536728




1,536728












  • RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
    – Sachin Gupta
    Nov 10 at 16:56


















  • RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
    – Sachin Gupta
    Nov 10 at 16:56
















RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
– Sachin Gupta
Nov 10 at 16:56




RouterModule.forRoot() is used for routing only in the root module of the application. For using routes in other modules, use RouterModule.forChild()
– Sachin Gupta
Nov 10 at 16:56












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are a few things that you'll have to fix to make it work properly.




  1. You'll have to add an opening route for your SubModule which will be a Lazy Loaded Module. You'll do this in your main-routing.module.ts file




const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'main',
component: MainComponent,
children: [{
path: 'sub',
loadChildren: './sub/sub.module#SubModule'
}]
}
];



  1. You'll then create a module named SubModule and the SubRoutingModule will act as a routing module for this SubModule. You'll declare your Sub1Component and Sub2Component here:




import { Sub1Component, Sub2Component } from './sub.component';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { Routes, RouterModule } from '@angular/router';

import { SubRoutingModule } from './sub-routing.module';

@NgModule({
declarations: [Sub1Component, Sub2Component],
imports: [SubRoutingModule]
})
export class SubModule { }


So now your routes will change to :



<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub1">Sub1</a> | 
<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub2">Sub2</a>


Here's an Updated StackBlitz for your ref.






share|improve this answer























  • I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:18










  • There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 17:19










  • Stackblitz example in the op.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:53










  • @rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 18:51


















up vote
1
down vote













Change forRoot to forChild in SubSubRoutingModule



// ./Sub/subsub/SubSub-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'subsub', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/sub/subsub
component: SubSubComponent,
]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], //<-- change here
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class SubSubRoutingModule { }





share|improve this answer





















  • That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:15










  • You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 17:46










  • I have added a stackblitz example
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:52






  • 1




    Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 18:04










  • That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 19:16











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240971%2fdefining-relative-routing-in-angular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are a few things that you'll have to fix to make it work properly.




  1. You'll have to add an opening route for your SubModule which will be a Lazy Loaded Module. You'll do this in your main-routing.module.ts file




const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'main',
component: MainComponent,
children: [{
path: 'sub',
loadChildren: './sub/sub.module#SubModule'
}]
}
];



  1. You'll then create a module named SubModule and the SubRoutingModule will act as a routing module for this SubModule. You'll declare your Sub1Component and Sub2Component here:




import { Sub1Component, Sub2Component } from './sub.component';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { Routes, RouterModule } from '@angular/router';

import { SubRoutingModule } from './sub-routing.module';

@NgModule({
declarations: [Sub1Component, Sub2Component],
imports: [SubRoutingModule]
})
export class SubModule { }


So now your routes will change to :



<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub1">Sub1</a> | 
<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub2">Sub2</a>


Here's an Updated StackBlitz for your ref.






share|improve this answer























  • I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:18










  • There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 17:19










  • Stackblitz example in the op.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:53










  • @rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 18:51















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are a few things that you'll have to fix to make it work properly.




  1. You'll have to add an opening route for your SubModule which will be a Lazy Loaded Module. You'll do this in your main-routing.module.ts file




const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'main',
component: MainComponent,
children: [{
path: 'sub',
loadChildren: './sub/sub.module#SubModule'
}]
}
];



  1. You'll then create a module named SubModule and the SubRoutingModule will act as a routing module for this SubModule. You'll declare your Sub1Component and Sub2Component here:




import { Sub1Component, Sub2Component } from './sub.component';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { Routes, RouterModule } from '@angular/router';

import { SubRoutingModule } from './sub-routing.module';

@NgModule({
declarations: [Sub1Component, Sub2Component],
imports: [SubRoutingModule]
})
export class SubModule { }


So now your routes will change to :



<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub1">Sub1</a> | 
<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub2">Sub2</a>


Here's an Updated StackBlitz for your ref.






share|improve this answer























  • I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:18










  • There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 17:19










  • Stackblitz example in the op.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:53










  • @rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 18:51













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






There are a few things that you'll have to fix to make it work properly.




  1. You'll have to add an opening route for your SubModule which will be a Lazy Loaded Module. You'll do this in your main-routing.module.ts file




const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'main',
component: MainComponent,
children: [{
path: 'sub',
loadChildren: './sub/sub.module#SubModule'
}]
}
];



  1. You'll then create a module named SubModule and the SubRoutingModule will act as a routing module for this SubModule. You'll declare your Sub1Component and Sub2Component here:




import { Sub1Component, Sub2Component } from './sub.component';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { Routes, RouterModule } from '@angular/router';

import { SubRoutingModule } from './sub-routing.module';

@NgModule({
declarations: [Sub1Component, Sub2Component],
imports: [SubRoutingModule]
})
export class SubModule { }


So now your routes will change to :



<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub1">Sub1</a> | 
<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub2">Sub2</a>


Here's an Updated StackBlitz for your ref.






share|improve this answer














There are a few things that you'll have to fix to make it work properly.




  1. You'll have to add an opening route for your SubModule which will be a Lazy Loaded Module. You'll do this in your main-routing.module.ts file




const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'main',
component: MainComponent,
children: [{
path: 'sub',
loadChildren: './sub/sub.module#SubModule'
}]
}
];



  1. You'll then create a module named SubModule and the SubRoutingModule will act as a routing module for this SubModule. You'll declare your Sub1Component and Sub2Component here:




import { Sub1Component, Sub2Component } from './sub.component';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { Routes, RouterModule } from '@angular/router';

import { SubRoutingModule } from './sub-routing.module';

@NgModule({
declarations: [Sub1Component, Sub2Component],
imports: [SubRoutingModule]
})
export class SubModule { }


So now your routes will change to :



<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub1">Sub1</a> | 
<a routerLink="/main/sub/sub2">Sub2</a>


Here's an Updated StackBlitz for your ref.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 10 at 18:51

























answered Nov 10 at 16:29









SiddAjmera

9,65821037




9,65821037












  • I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:18










  • There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 17:19










  • Stackblitz example in the op.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:53










  • @rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 18:51


















  • I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:18










  • There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 17:19










  • Stackblitz example in the op.
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:53










  • @rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
    – SiddAjmera
    Nov 10 at 18:51
















I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:18




I need to have multiple routing files at different locations.
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:18












There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
– SiddAjmera
Nov 10 at 17:19




There's a serious architectural issue with your Current Implementation. Can you please share a more concrete example of your modules and probably a minimal stackblitz sample replicating your issue?
– SiddAjmera
Nov 10 at 17:19












Stackblitz example in the op.
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:53




Stackblitz example in the op.
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:53












@rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
– SiddAjmera
Nov 10 at 18:51




@rst, please go through my updated answer. Hopefully this should help you achieve what you're trying to.
– SiddAjmera
Nov 10 at 18:51












up vote
1
down vote













Change forRoot to forChild in SubSubRoutingModule



// ./Sub/subsub/SubSub-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'subsub', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/sub/subsub
component: SubSubComponent,
]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], //<-- change here
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class SubSubRoutingModule { }





share|improve this answer





















  • That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:15










  • You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 17:46










  • I have added a stackblitz example
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:52






  • 1




    Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 18:04










  • That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 19:16















up vote
1
down vote













Change forRoot to forChild in SubSubRoutingModule



// ./Sub/subsub/SubSub-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'subsub', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/sub/subsub
component: SubSubComponent,
]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], //<-- change here
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class SubSubRoutingModule { }





share|improve this answer





















  • That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:15










  • You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 17:46










  • I have added a stackblitz example
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:52






  • 1




    Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 18:04










  • That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 19:16













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Change forRoot to forChild in SubSubRoutingModule



// ./Sub/subsub/SubSub-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'subsub', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/sub/subsub
component: SubSubComponent,
]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], //<-- change here
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class SubSubRoutingModule { }





share|improve this answer












Change forRoot to forChild in SubSubRoutingModule



// ./Sub/subsub/SubSub-Routing.module.ts
const routes: Routes = [
{
path: 'subsub', //<-- this shall route to www.site.com/sub/subsub
component: SubSubComponent,
]
}
];

@NgModule({
imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], //<-- change here
exports: [RouterModule],
declarations:
})
export class SubSubRoutingModule { }






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 10 at 16:37









Sunil Singh

5,4421625




5,4421625












  • That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:15










  • You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 17:46










  • I have added a stackblitz example
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:52






  • 1




    Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 18:04










  • That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 19:16


















  • That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:15










  • You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 17:46










  • I have added a stackblitz example
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 17:52






  • 1




    Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
    – Sunil Singh
    Nov 10 at 18:04










  • That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
    – rst
    Nov 10 at 19:16
















That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:15




That works, but SubSub (I changed it in the OP to A and B, thought that was more clearer) get routet to the root, i.e. /subsub instead of /Sub/subsub
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:15












You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
– Sunil Singh
Nov 10 at 17:46




You should implement with Lazy Module. Look at this demo for reference stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hcerdo
– Sunil Singh
Nov 10 at 17:46












I have added a stackblitz example
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:52




I have added a stackblitz example
– rst
Nov 10 at 17:52




1




1




Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
– Sunil Singh
Nov 10 at 18:04




Here is the modified version of your demo stackblitz.com/edit/angular-3mjttd
– Sunil Singh
Nov 10 at 18:04












That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
– rst
Nov 10 at 19:16




That's exactly what I was Looking for! Excellent
– rst
Nov 10 at 19:16


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240971%2fdefining-relative-routing-in-angular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Lugert, Oklahoma