angularJs and jasmine performance issues
I have been tasked with performance enhancement across our entire angularjs app, filled with controllers, services, components and more, all unit tested with jasmine.
One of the performance issues I see is DOM node size, which seems are a result of a ton of methods and vars being added to the scope object so that it can be properly tested against in unit tests.
Is there away around this issue, aside from just throwing everything in a service, or is that the recommended pattern?
I definitely notice a performance enhancement when removing items from DOM so i feel like this definitely needs to be addressed.
angularjs performance unit-testing jasmine
add a comment |
I have been tasked with performance enhancement across our entire angularjs app, filled with controllers, services, components and more, all unit tested with jasmine.
One of the performance issues I see is DOM node size, which seems are a result of a ton of methods and vars being added to the scope object so that it can be properly tested against in unit tests.
Is there away around this issue, aside from just throwing everything in a service, or is that the recommended pattern?
I definitely notice a performance enhancement when removing items from DOM so i feel like this definitely needs to be addressed.
angularjs performance unit-testing jasmine
add a comment |
I have been tasked with performance enhancement across our entire angularjs app, filled with controllers, services, components and more, all unit tested with jasmine.
One of the performance issues I see is DOM node size, which seems are a result of a ton of methods and vars being added to the scope object so that it can be properly tested against in unit tests.
Is there away around this issue, aside from just throwing everything in a service, or is that the recommended pattern?
I definitely notice a performance enhancement when removing items from DOM so i feel like this definitely needs to be addressed.
angularjs performance unit-testing jasmine
I have been tasked with performance enhancement across our entire angularjs app, filled with controllers, services, components and more, all unit tested with jasmine.
One of the performance issues I see is DOM node size, which seems are a result of a ton of methods and vars being added to the scope object so that it can be properly tested against in unit tests.
Is there away around this issue, aside from just throwing everything in a service, or is that the recommended pattern?
I definitely notice a performance enhancement when removing items from DOM so i feel like this definitely needs to be addressed.
angularjs performance unit-testing jasmine
angularjs performance unit-testing jasmine
asked Nov 14 '18 at 2:31
efsnickefsnick
668
668
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292359%2fangularjs-and-jasmine-performance-issues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292359%2fangularjs-and-jasmine-performance-issues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown