Find total physical memory on computer, .NET core 2.1, c#, Ubuntu
How do I find the total available physical memory on a computer specifically running Ubuntu and .NET core? Most solutions work only on full .NET and the following .NET core code snippet --
ManagementClass mc = new ManagementClass ("Win32_ComputerSystem");
ManagementObjectCollection moc = mc.GetInstances();
foreach (ManagementObject item in moc)
m1 = Convert.ToUInt64(item.Properties["TotalPhysicalMemory"].Value);
works properly on Windows but returns 0 on non-Windows systems.
c# linux .net-core
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
add a comment |
How do I find the total available physical memory on a computer specifically running Ubuntu and .NET core? Most solutions work only on full .NET and the following .NET core code snippet --
ManagementClass mc = new ManagementClass ("Win32_ComputerSystem");
ManagementObjectCollection moc = mc.GetInstances();
foreach (ManagementObject item in moc)
m1 = Convert.ToUInt64(item.Properties["TotalPhysicalMemory"].Value);
works properly on Windows but returns 0 on non-Windows systems.
c# linux .net-core
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
WMI(Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.
– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
add a comment |
How do I find the total available physical memory on a computer specifically running Ubuntu and .NET core? Most solutions work only on full .NET and the following .NET core code snippet --
ManagementClass mc = new ManagementClass ("Win32_ComputerSystem");
ManagementObjectCollection moc = mc.GetInstances();
foreach (ManagementObject item in moc)
m1 = Convert.ToUInt64(item.Properties["TotalPhysicalMemory"].Value);
works properly on Windows but returns 0 on non-Windows systems.
c# linux .net-core
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
How do I find the total available physical memory on a computer specifically running Ubuntu and .NET core? Most solutions work only on full .NET and the following .NET core code snippet --
ManagementClass mc = new ManagementClass ("Win32_ComputerSystem");
ManagementObjectCollection moc = mc.GetInstances();
foreach (ManagementObject item in moc)
m1 = Convert.ToUInt64(item.Properties["TotalPhysicalMemory"].Value);
works properly on Windows but returns 0 on non-Windows systems.
c# linux .net-core
c# linux .net-core
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
asked Nov 12 '18 at 20:12
lhslhs
132
132
WMI(Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.
– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
add a comment |
WMI(Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.
– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Currently you can't get Hardware information on all Platforms, this is also mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/22660
I think since .NET Core 2.1 you can use Process class to get process memory, as mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/26669
As an alternative, on Linux you could always access HW and OS information from files in /proc, for memory there is /proc/meminfo
There you get MemTotal, MemFree and a lot of other information.
However this approach requires some file parsing.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269407%2ffind-total-physical-memory-on-computer-net-core-2-1-c-ubuntu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Currently you can't get Hardware information on all Platforms, this is also mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/22660
I think since .NET Core 2.1 you can use Process class to get process memory, as mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/26669
As an alternative, on Linux you could always access HW and OS information from files in /proc, for memory there is /proc/meminfo
There you get MemTotal, MemFree and a lot of other information.
However this approach requires some file parsing.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
add a comment |
Currently you can't get Hardware information on all Platforms, this is also mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/22660
I think since .NET Core 2.1 you can use Process class to get process memory, as mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/26669
As an alternative, on Linux you could always access HW and OS information from files in /proc, for memory there is /proc/meminfo
There you get MemTotal, MemFree and a lot of other information.
However this approach requires some file parsing.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
add a comment |
Currently you can't get Hardware information on all Platforms, this is also mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/22660
I think since .NET Core 2.1 you can use Process class to get process memory, as mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/26669
As an alternative, on Linux you could always access HW and OS information from files in /proc, for memory there is /proc/meminfo
There you get MemTotal, MemFree and a lot of other information.
However this approach requires some file parsing.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
Currently you can't get Hardware information on all Platforms, this is also mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/22660
I think since .NET Core 2.1 you can use Process class to get process memory, as mentioned in this issue: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/26669
As an alternative, on Linux you could always access HW and OS information from files in /proc, for memory there is /proc/meminfo
There you get MemTotal, MemFree and a lot of other information.
However this approach requires some file parsing.
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
answered Nov 12 '18 at 20:55
hiiruhiiru
415
415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269407%2ffind-total-physical-memory-on-computer-net-core-2-1-c-ubuntu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
WMI(Windows Management Instrumentation) queries are available in Windows only (a similar CIM implementation is at an early stage in some Linux distributions). You are calling a stub.– Jimi
Nov 12 '18 at 20:55