index records with similar value in solr
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
i have three docs to be indexed into solr . sample of the 3 docs has been given below.
Doc 1:{ name:"alex" age:"25"}
Doc 2:{ name:"alex" age:"29"}
Doc 3:{ name:"benu" age:"29"}
Suggest me a way to index this.
apache tomcat solr solrj solrcloud
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
add a comment |
i have three docs to be indexed into solr . sample of the 3 docs has been given below.
Doc 1:{ name:"alex" age:"25"}
Doc 2:{ name:"alex" age:"29"}
Doc 3:{ name:"benu" age:"29"}
Suggest me a way to index this.
apache tomcat solr solrj solrcloud
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36
add a comment |
i have three docs to be indexed into solr . sample of the 3 docs has been given below.
Doc 1:{ name:"alex" age:"25"}
Doc 2:{ name:"alex" age:"29"}
Doc 3:{ name:"benu" age:"29"}
Suggest me a way to index this.
apache tomcat solr solrj solrcloud
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
i have three docs to be indexed into solr . sample of the 3 docs has been given below.
Doc 1:{ name:"alex" age:"25"}
Doc 2:{ name:"alex" age:"29"}
Doc 3:{ name:"benu" age:"29"}
Suggest me a way to index this.
apache tomcat solr solrj solrcloud
apache tomcat solr solrj solrcloud
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:20
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
276
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36
add a comment |
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
So if name is not unique, why is it the uniqueKey?
You have the option to give overwrite=false in the update request if you want to override the uniqueKey requirement for certain updates, but be aware that this will require that parameter to be present for any request that updates documents.
It's usually far better to assign a uniqueKey to each row (such as a uuid), or use an existing one (like the id of the row in the database).
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
add a comment |
In order to index the above 3 documents , i just removed the unique key( mentioned below) in the managed schema and it works perfectly.
<uniqueKey>name</uniqueKey>
In case if removing this throws a QueryElevate exception, remove the searchComponent named elevator in the solrconfig.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53336854%2findex-records-with-similar-value-in-solr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
So if name is not unique, why is it the uniqueKey?
You have the option to give overwrite=false in the update request if you want to override the uniqueKey requirement for certain updates, but be aware that this will require that parameter to be present for any request that updates documents.
It's usually far better to assign a uniqueKey to each row (such as a uuid), or use an existing one (like the id of the row in the database).
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
add a comment |
So if name is not unique, why is it the uniqueKey?
You have the option to give overwrite=false in the update request if you want to override the uniqueKey requirement for certain updates, but be aware that this will require that parameter to be present for any request that updates documents.
It's usually far better to assign a uniqueKey to each row (such as a uuid), or use an existing one (like the id of the row in the database).
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
add a comment |
So if name is not unique, why is it the uniqueKey?
You have the option to give overwrite=false in the update request if you want to override the uniqueKey requirement for certain updates, but be aware that this will require that parameter to be present for any request that updates documents.
It's usually far better to assign a uniqueKey to each row (such as a uuid), or use an existing one (like the id of the row in the database).
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
So if name is not unique, why is it the uniqueKey?
You have the option to give overwrite=false in the update request if you want to override the uniqueKey requirement for certain updates, but be aware that this will require that parameter to be present for any request that updates documents.
It's usually far better to assign a uniqueKey to each row (such as a uuid), or use an existing one (like the id of the row in the database).
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
answered Nov 19 '18 at 7:42
MatsLindhMatsLindh
26.1k32342
26.1k32342
add a comment |
add a comment |
In order to index the above 3 documents , i just removed the unique key( mentioned below) in the managed schema and it works perfectly.
<uniqueKey>name</uniqueKey>
In case if removing this throws a QueryElevate exception, remove the searchComponent named elevator in the solrconfig.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
add a comment |
In order to index the above 3 documents , i just removed the unique key( mentioned below) in the managed schema and it works perfectly.
<uniqueKey>name</uniqueKey>
In case if removing this throws a QueryElevate exception, remove the searchComponent named elevator in the solrconfig.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
add a comment |
In order to index the above 3 documents , i just removed the unique key( mentioned below) in the managed schema and it works perfectly.
<uniqueKey>name</uniqueKey>
In case if removing this throws a QueryElevate exception, remove the searchComponent named elevator in the solrconfig.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
In order to index the above 3 documents , i just removed the unique key( mentioned below) in the managed schema and it works perfectly.
<uniqueKey>name</uniqueKey>
In case if removing this throws a QueryElevate exception, remove the searchComponent named elevator in the solrconfig.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:37
UMA MAHESWARUMA MAHESWAR
276
276
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
add a comment |
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
@MatsLindh this approach worked for me Sir.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 5:39
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
But not having a uniqueKey will break many features in Solr. It's far from an ideal situation.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 9:11
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
@MatsLindh can you please quote some major disadvantages that we have if we remove the uniquekey feature in schema?
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 20 '18 at 11:21
1
1
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
You won't be able to use efficient deep pagination using cursorMarks, you won't be able to update an existing document, you won't be able to explicitly delete one document of a set of duplicates (where information is identical). Any operation that requires referencing one specific document will either be more complicated if the feature supports giving it a query (and at least one field differ between them), or impossible to retrieve. Some Streaming Expressions require a unique id for a document, etc. Add a unique key.
– MatsLindh
Nov 20 '18 at 12:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53336854%2findex-records-with-similar-value-in-solr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There are no special requirements to index this in Solr. What issue are you running into?
– MatsLindh
Nov 16 '18 at 20:14
@MatsLindh the unique key is "name" here . Since there are 2 names with the value as alex , only one is getting indexed.
– UMA MAHESWAR
Nov 19 '18 at 4:36