Literal '_' in prolog?
Is there a way to unify to the quoted atom '_' as the literal underscore? Or does Prolog still treat this as the anonymous variable? I cannot for the life of me get a functor(['_']) to fire even if I type that exact phrase into the prolog prompt.
This is part of a larger program where I'm taking a string input as a list of ASCII codes, then to a list of atoms, and finally trying to do some list processing on that. I'm currently using the combo of read_line_to_codes/2, name/2 atom_chars/2. to obtain that list of atoms.
Please excuse any improper terminology; I'm new to Prolog.
prolog
add a comment |
Is there a way to unify to the quoted atom '_' as the literal underscore? Or does Prolog still treat this as the anonymous variable? I cannot for the life of me get a functor(['_']) to fire even if I type that exact phrase into the prolog prompt.
This is part of a larger program where I'm taking a string input as a list of ASCII codes, then to a list of atoms, and finally trying to do some list processing on that. I'm currently using the combo of read_line_to_codes/2, name/2 atom_chars/2. to obtain that list of atoms.
Please excuse any improper terminology; I'm new to Prolog.
prolog
1
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
1
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:atom_codes('_', C).results inC = [95].atom_chars/2just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.
– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33
add a comment |
Is there a way to unify to the quoted atom '_' as the literal underscore? Or does Prolog still treat this as the anonymous variable? I cannot for the life of me get a functor(['_']) to fire even if I type that exact phrase into the prolog prompt.
This is part of a larger program where I'm taking a string input as a list of ASCII codes, then to a list of atoms, and finally trying to do some list processing on that. I'm currently using the combo of read_line_to_codes/2, name/2 atom_chars/2. to obtain that list of atoms.
Please excuse any improper terminology; I'm new to Prolog.
prolog
Is there a way to unify to the quoted atom '_' as the literal underscore? Or does Prolog still treat this as the anonymous variable? I cannot for the life of me get a functor(['_']) to fire even if I type that exact phrase into the prolog prompt.
This is part of a larger program where I'm taking a string input as a list of ASCII codes, then to a list of atoms, and finally trying to do some list processing on that. I'm currently using the combo of read_line_to_codes/2, name/2 atom_chars/2. to obtain that list of atoms.
Please excuse any improper terminology; I'm new to Prolog.
prolog
prolog
edited Nov 18 '18 at 21:42
false
10.4k773151
10.4k773151
asked Nov 16 '18 at 3:52
BrandonBrandon
165
165
1
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
1
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:atom_codes('_', C).results inC = [95].atom_chars/2just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.
– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33
add a comment |
1
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
1
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:atom_codes('_', C).results inC = [95].atom_chars/2just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.
– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33
1
1
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
1
1
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:
atom_codes('_', C). results in C = [95]. atom_chars/2 just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:
atom_codes('_', C). results in C = [95]. atom_chars/2 just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53331176%2fliteral-in-prolog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53331176%2fliteral-in-prolog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
That is a literal underscore. However, you're reading codes, not chars, so you probably want 95 instead.
– Daniel Lyons
Nov 16 '18 at 6:39
1
To underscore (no pun intended) what Daniel said:
atom_codes('_', C).results inC = [95].atom_chars/2just breaks an atom up into a list of single-character atoms, not atom character codes.– lurker
Nov 16 '18 at 14:33