Creating an Array of Objects - Inheriting from a Class Template and using Constructor in C++












2















So here's my template class declaration:



template <class elemType>
class listType


I have a constructor like this:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


With a protected member variable like this:



elemType *list;


This is to pass in objects of type stockType in my code. I inherited a class from this template class listType called stockListType and tried to make a constructor that would pass in the parameters to the already made constructor in listType with this:



stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const 
stockType &b, const stockType &c, const stockType &d, const
stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e) {

}


I'm not sure if I understand how to use class templates and constructors with class templates that I inherited a class from.



I tried making 5 objects of type stockType (inputting their information for their member variables using a file) and then trying to use the constructor of the inherited class with those objects in my main code:



stockListType object(obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4, obj5); 


But I keep getting an error when it tries to run.



EDIT:
The error I get is Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)



The child class header is:



#ifndef stockListTypeHeader_h
#define stockListTypeHeader_h

#include "listType Header.h"

class stockListType : public listType <class stockType>
{
public:
stockListType(const stockType &, const stockType &, const stockType &, const
stockType &, const stockType &);

void sortList();
void swap(stockType&, stockType&);

const void printList();

protected:
stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss;




};


#endif /* stockListTypeHeader_h */


And the .cpp file of the child class is:



#include <stdio.h>
#include "stockListTypeHeader.h"
#include "stockType.h"
#include <iostream>


void stockListType:: sortList(){
sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

for(int i =0; i<5; i++){
for(int j =0; j<5-i-1; j++) {
if (sortIndicesGainLoss[j].getStockSymbol() >
sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1].getStockSymbol()){
swap(sortIndicesGainLoss[j], sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1] );
}
}
}
}

void stockListType:: swap(stockType &xp, stockType &yp){
stockType temp = xp;
xp = yp;
yp = temp;

}

void const stockListType:: printList() {
for(int i=0; i<5; i++)
cout << sortIndicesGainLoss[i];

}

stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const stockType &b, const
stockType &c, const stockType &d, const stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e)
{

}


EDIT 3:



Thank you all for helping me, I figured out it was because I hadn't initialized list or my sortIndicesGainLoss.



Now I am getting an error under my sortList method. Does anybody have a clue as to why?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

    – Some programmer dude
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:38






  • 2





    "But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

    – Yksisarvinen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39






  • 1





    The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:45






  • 1





    You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:51






  • 1





    "I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:52
















2















So here's my template class declaration:



template <class elemType>
class listType


I have a constructor like this:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


With a protected member variable like this:



elemType *list;


This is to pass in objects of type stockType in my code. I inherited a class from this template class listType called stockListType and tried to make a constructor that would pass in the parameters to the already made constructor in listType with this:



stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const 
stockType &b, const stockType &c, const stockType &d, const
stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e) {

}


I'm not sure if I understand how to use class templates and constructors with class templates that I inherited a class from.



I tried making 5 objects of type stockType (inputting their information for their member variables using a file) and then trying to use the constructor of the inherited class with those objects in my main code:



stockListType object(obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4, obj5); 


But I keep getting an error when it tries to run.



EDIT:
The error I get is Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)



The child class header is:



#ifndef stockListTypeHeader_h
#define stockListTypeHeader_h

#include "listType Header.h"

class stockListType : public listType <class stockType>
{
public:
stockListType(const stockType &, const stockType &, const stockType &, const
stockType &, const stockType &);

void sortList();
void swap(stockType&, stockType&);

const void printList();

protected:
stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss;




};


#endif /* stockListTypeHeader_h */


And the .cpp file of the child class is:



#include <stdio.h>
#include "stockListTypeHeader.h"
#include "stockType.h"
#include <iostream>


void stockListType:: sortList(){
sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

for(int i =0; i<5; i++){
for(int j =0; j<5-i-1; j++) {
if (sortIndicesGainLoss[j].getStockSymbol() >
sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1].getStockSymbol()){
swap(sortIndicesGainLoss[j], sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1] );
}
}
}
}

void stockListType:: swap(stockType &xp, stockType &yp){
stockType temp = xp;
xp = yp;
yp = temp;

}

void const stockListType:: printList() {
for(int i=0; i<5; i++)
cout << sortIndicesGainLoss[i];

}

stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const stockType &b, const
stockType &c, const stockType &d, const stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e)
{

}


EDIT 3:



Thank you all for helping me, I figured out it was because I hadn't initialized list or my sortIndicesGainLoss.



Now I am getting an error under my sortList method. Does anybody have a clue as to why?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

    – Some programmer dude
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:38






  • 2





    "But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

    – Yksisarvinen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39






  • 1





    The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:45






  • 1





    You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:51






  • 1





    "I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:52














2












2








2








So here's my template class declaration:



template <class elemType>
class listType


I have a constructor like this:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


With a protected member variable like this:



elemType *list;


This is to pass in objects of type stockType in my code. I inherited a class from this template class listType called stockListType and tried to make a constructor that would pass in the parameters to the already made constructor in listType with this:



stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const 
stockType &b, const stockType &c, const stockType &d, const
stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e) {

}


I'm not sure if I understand how to use class templates and constructors with class templates that I inherited a class from.



I tried making 5 objects of type stockType (inputting their information for their member variables using a file) and then trying to use the constructor of the inherited class with those objects in my main code:



stockListType object(obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4, obj5); 


But I keep getting an error when it tries to run.



EDIT:
The error I get is Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)



The child class header is:



#ifndef stockListTypeHeader_h
#define stockListTypeHeader_h

#include "listType Header.h"

class stockListType : public listType <class stockType>
{
public:
stockListType(const stockType &, const stockType &, const stockType &, const
stockType &, const stockType &);

void sortList();
void swap(stockType&, stockType&);

const void printList();

protected:
stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss;




};


#endif /* stockListTypeHeader_h */


And the .cpp file of the child class is:



#include <stdio.h>
#include "stockListTypeHeader.h"
#include "stockType.h"
#include <iostream>


void stockListType:: sortList(){
sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

for(int i =0; i<5; i++){
for(int j =0; j<5-i-1; j++) {
if (sortIndicesGainLoss[j].getStockSymbol() >
sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1].getStockSymbol()){
swap(sortIndicesGainLoss[j], sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1] );
}
}
}
}

void stockListType:: swap(stockType &xp, stockType &yp){
stockType temp = xp;
xp = yp;
yp = temp;

}

void const stockListType:: printList() {
for(int i=0; i<5; i++)
cout << sortIndicesGainLoss[i];

}

stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const stockType &b, const
stockType &c, const stockType &d, const stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e)
{

}


EDIT 3:



Thank you all for helping me, I figured out it was because I hadn't initialized list or my sortIndicesGainLoss.



Now I am getting an error under my sortList method. Does anybody have a clue as to why?










share|improve this question
















So here's my template class declaration:



template <class elemType>
class listType


I have a constructor like this:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


With a protected member variable like this:



elemType *list;


This is to pass in objects of type stockType in my code. I inherited a class from this template class listType called stockListType and tried to make a constructor that would pass in the parameters to the already made constructor in listType with this:



stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const 
stockType &b, const stockType &c, const stockType &d, const
stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e) {

}


I'm not sure if I understand how to use class templates and constructors with class templates that I inherited a class from.



I tried making 5 objects of type stockType (inputting their information for their member variables using a file) and then trying to use the constructor of the inherited class with those objects in my main code:



stockListType object(obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4, obj5); 


But I keep getting an error when it tries to run.



EDIT:
The error I get is Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)



The child class header is:



#ifndef stockListTypeHeader_h
#define stockListTypeHeader_h

#include "listType Header.h"

class stockListType : public listType <class stockType>
{
public:
stockListType(const stockType &, const stockType &, const stockType &, const
stockType &, const stockType &);

void sortList();
void swap(stockType&, stockType&);

const void printList();

protected:
stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss;




};


#endif /* stockListTypeHeader_h */


And the .cpp file of the child class is:



#include <stdio.h>
#include "stockListTypeHeader.h"
#include "stockType.h"
#include <iostream>


void stockListType:: sortList(){
sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

for(int i =0; i<5; i++){
for(int j =0; j<5-i-1; j++) {
if (sortIndicesGainLoss[j].getStockSymbol() >
sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1].getStockSymbol()){
swap(sortIndicesGainLoss[j], sortIndicesGainLoss[j+1] );
}
}
}
}

void stockListType:: swap(stockType &xp, stockType &yp){
stockType temp = xp;
xp = yp;
yp = temp;

}

void const stockListType:: printList() {
for(int i=0; i<5; i++)
cout << sortIndicesGainLoss[i];

}

stockListType :: stockListType(const stockType &a, const stockType &b, const
stockType &c, const stockType &d, const stockType &e) : listType(a, b, c, d, e)
{

}


EDIT 3:



Thank you all for helping me, I figured out it was because I hadn't initialized list or my sortIndicesGainLoss.



Now I am getting an error under my sortList method. Does anybody have a clue as to why?







c++ class templates inheritance constructor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:30







Alexandra

















asked Nov 15 '18 at 8:34









AlexandraAlexandra

369




369








  • 3





    Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

    – Some programmer dude
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:38






  • 2





    "But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

    – Yksisarvinen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39






  • 1





    The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:45






  • 1





    You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:51






  • 1





    "I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:52














  • 3





    Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

    – Some programmer dude
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:38






  • 2





    "But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

    – Yksisarvinen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39






  • 1





    The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:45






  • 1





    You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:51






  • 1





    "I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

    – UnholySheep
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:52








3




3





Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

– Some programmer dude
Nov 15 '18 at 8:38





Please read about how to ask good questions, as well as this question checklist. And of course please try to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example to show us. Lastly please learn how to debug your programs.

– Some programmer dude
Nov 15 '18 at 8:38




2




2





"But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

– Yksisarvinen
Nov 15 '18 at 8:39





"But I keep getting an error when it tries to run." What error? Please edit the question to copy and paste full error message into it.

– Yksisarvinen
Nov 15 '18 at 8:39




1




1





The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 8:45





The error I get is : Thread 1: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) @Yksisarvinen

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 8:45




1




1





You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

– UnholySheep
Nov 15 '18 at 8:51





You have uninitialized pointers, they don't point to valid memory - dereferencing them like you do invokes undefined behavior. That has nothing to do with templates or inheritance. Also you should prefer std::vector over pointers for this

– UnholySheep
Nov 15 '18 at 8:51




1




1





"I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

– UnholySheep
Nov 15 '18 at 8:52





"I thought you could create a pointer and just assign its indexes to objects as you pleased" - Where did you learn that? It's completely wrong and any decent course or textbook should be explaining it

– UnholySheep
Nov 15 '18 at 8:52












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














elemType *list; is not initialized. I really think that's the problem right there. try initializing it in the constructor to something like



list = new elemType [5]; since you'll be using 5 elements.



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

this->list = new elemType [5];

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you, this is why it's not working.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:10











  • Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:18











  • so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:19



















2














The problem is, in the constructor of listType you are not allocating memory for the array list. If your class has a member of type * elemType, this would be a pointer to a elemType, but it does not mean it points to allocated memory.
A solution to your problem is to write the constructor of listType as follows:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &) : list(new elemType[5]) {

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


But then do not forget to deallocate list when your object gets destructed. You need a distructor inside the definition of the class list as:



virtual ~listType { delete list; }


The destructor should be virtual, see the discussion here



That said, rather than using C-style arrays, if the size of the array list is known at compile time, I would rather suggest to use the C++11 arrays. So, in the declaration of the class listType your protected member list should be declared as



std::array<elemType, 5> list;


Then you do not need anymore to allocate and deallocate "manually" the array list. Also, you need to #include <array>



As for the second error when sortIndicesGainLoss = list;: you do not need the member stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss. In fact, by calling the constructor of the base class listType, you have already initialized the array list of elemType, which, being protected, is accessible to stockListType. So to solve the problem:




  • Remove stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss from the declaration of stockListType


  • In the cpp file remove sortIndicesGainLoss = list;, and everywhere use the inherited member list instead of sortIndicesGainLoss







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:30











  • Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:31











  • @Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:37











  • @francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:42













  • @marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:47











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315269%2fcreating-an-array-of-objects-inheriting-from-a-class-template-and-using-constr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














elemType *list; is not initialized. I really think that's the problem right there. try initializing it in the constructor to something like



list = new elemType [5]; since you'll be using 5 elements.



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

this->list = new elemType [5];

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you, this is why it's not working.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:10











  • Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:18











  • so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:19
















2














elemType *list; is not initialized. I really think that's the problem right there. try initializing it in the constructor to something like



list = new elemType [5]; since you'll be using 5 elements.



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

this->list = new elemType [5];

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you, this is why it's not working.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:10











  • Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:18











  • so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:19














2












2








2







elemType *list; is not initialized. I really think that's the problem right there. try initializing it in the constructor to something like



list = new elemType [5]; since you'll be using 5 elements.



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

this->list = new elemType [5];

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}





share|improve this answer













elemType *list; is not initialized. I really think that's the problem right there. try initializing it in the constructor to something like



list = new elemType [5]; since you'll be using 5 elements.



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &){

this->list = new elemType [5];

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:05









marvinIsSaculmarvinIsSacul

53717




53717








  • 1





    Thank you, this is why it's not working.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:10











  • Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:18











  • so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:19














  • 1





    Thank you, this is why it's not working.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:10











  • Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











  • try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:18











  • so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:19








1




1





Thank you, this is why it's not working.

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:10





Thank you, this is why it's not working.

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:10













Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12





Now I'm getting an error around the point where I do: sortIndicesGainLoss = list;

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12













It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12





It says: Thread 1: breakpoint 1.1

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12













try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:18





try not using sortIndicesGainLoss. try removing sortIndicesGainLoss = list; and use list directly.

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:18













so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:19





so replace every instance of sortIndicesGainLoss with list

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:19













2














The problem is, in the constructor of listType you are not allocating memory for the array list. If your class has a member of type * elemType, this would be a pointer to a elemType, but it does not mean it points to allocated memory.
A solution to your problem is to write the constructor of listType as follows:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &) : list(new elemType[5]) {

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


But then do not forget to deallocate list when your object gets destructed. You need a distructor inside the definition of the class list as:



virtual ~listType { delete list; }


The destructor should be virtual, see the discussion here



That said, rather than using C-style arrays, if the size of the array list is known at compile time, I would rather suggest to use the C++11 arrays. So, in the declaration of the class listType your protected member list should be declared as



std::array<elemType, 5> list;


Then you do not need anymore to allocate and deallocate "manually" the array list. Also, you need to #include <array>



As for the second error when sortIndicesGainLoss = list;: you do not need the member stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss. In fact, by calling the constructor of the base class listType, you have already initialized the array list of elemType, which, being protected, is accessible to stockListType. So to solve the problem:




  • Remove stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss from the declaration of stockListType


  • In the cpp file remove sortIndicesGainLoss = list;, and everywhere use the inherited member list instead of sortIndicesGainLoss







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:30











  • Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:31











  • @Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:37











  • @francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:42













  • @marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:47
















2














The problem is, in the constructor of listType you are not allocating memory for the array list. If your class has a member of type * elemType, this would be a pointer to a elemType, but it does not mean it points to allocated memory.
A solution to your problem is to write the constructor of listType as follows:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &) : list(new elemType[5]) {

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


But then do not forget to deallocate list when your object gets destructed. You need a distructor inside the definition of the class list as:



virtual ~listType { delete list; }


The destructor should be virtual, see the discussion here



That said, rather than using C-style arrays, if the size of the array list is known at compile time, I would rather suggest to use the C++11 arrays. So, in the declaration of the class listType your protected member list should be declared as



std::array<elemType, 5> list;


Then you do not need anymore to allocate and deallocate "manually" the array list. Also, you need to #include <array>



As for the second error when sortIndicesGainLoss = list;: you do not need the member stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss. In fact, by calling the constructor of the base class listType, you have already initialized the array list of elemType, which, being protected, is accessible to stockListType. So to solve the problem:




  • Remove stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss from the declaration of stockListType


  • In the cpp file remove sortIndicesGainLoss = list;, and everywhere use the inherited member list instead of sortIndicesGainLoss







share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:30











  • Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:31











  • @Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:37











  • @francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:42













  • @marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:47














2












2








2







The problem is, in the constructor of listType you are not allocating memory for the array list. If your class has a member of type * elemType, this would be a pointer to a elemType, but it does not mean it points to allocated memory.
A solution to your problem is to write the constructor of listType as follows:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &) : list(new elemType[5]) {

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


But then do not forget to deallocate list when your object gets destructed. You need a distructor inside the definition of the class list as:



virtual ~listType { delete list; }


The destructor should be virtual, see the discussion here



That said, rather than using C-style arrays, if the size of the array list is known at compile time, I would rather suggest to use the C++11 arrays. So, in the declaration of the class listType your protected member list should be declared as



std::array<elemType, 5> list;


Then you do not need anymore to allocate and deallocate "manually" the array list. Also, you need to #include <array>



As for the second error when sortIndicesGainLoss = list;: you do not need the member stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss. In fact, by calling the constructor of the base class listType, you have already initialized the array list of elemType, which, being protected, is accessible to stockListType. So to solve the problem:




  • Remove stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss from the declaration of stockListType


  • In the cpp file remove sortIndicesGainLoss = list;, and everywhere use the inherited member list instead of sortIndicesGainLoss







share|improve this answer















The problem is, in the constructor of listType you are not allocating memory for the array list. If your class has a member of type * elemType, this would be a pointer to a elemType, but it does not mean it points to allocated memory.
A solution to your problem is to write the constructor of listType as follows:



listType(const elemType &, const elemType &, const elemType &, 
const elemType &, const elemType &) : list(new elemType[5]) {

list[0] = a;
list[1] = b;
list[2] = c;
list[3] = d;
list[4] = e;

}


But then do not forget to deallocate list when your object gets destructed. You need a distructor inside the definition of the class list as:



virtual ~listType { delete list; }


The destructor should be virtual, see the discussion here



That said, rather than using C-style arrays, if the size of the array list is known at compile time, I would rather suggest to use the C++11 arrays. So, in the declaration of the class listType your protected member list should be declared as



std::array<elemType, 5> list;


Then you do not need anymore to allocate and deallocate "manually" the array list. Also, you need to #include <array>



As for the second error when sortIndicesGainLoss = list;: you do not need the member stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss. In fact, by calling the constructor of the base class listType, you have already initialized the array list of elemType, which, being protected, is accessible to stockListType. So to solve the problem:




  • Remove stockType *sortIndicesGainLoss from the declaration of stockListType


  • In the cpp file remove sortIndicesGainLoss = list;, and everywhere use the inherited member list instead of sortIndicesGainLoss








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 15 '18 at 10:38

























answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:23









francescofrancesco

9201212




9201212













  • Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:30











  • Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:31











  • @Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:37











  • @francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:42













  • @marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:47



















  • Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:30











  • Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

    – Alexandra
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:31











  • @Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:37











  • @francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

    – marvinIsSacul
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:42













  • @marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

    – francesco
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:47

















Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:30





Thank you so much. This really helps. So when I use a C++11 array, I do not need to use delete anymore? I will have to use that from now on.

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:30













Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:31





Also, now I am getting an error under my sortList() method. Do you happen to know why?

– Alexandra
Nov 15 '18 at 9:31













@Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

– francesco
Nov 15 '18 at 9:37





@Alexandra: If you declare list as a C++11 you do not need to use delete. You should think it like a normal variable, which gets automatically deleted when it exits the scope. For the error in sortList() please check first my updated answer.

– francesco
Nov 15 '18 at 9:37













@francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:42







@francesco I seriousy don't understand why you and others are throwing the kid with the std library. Because I think the kid wants to learn the language first (hence he creates his own algorithms), not the libraries. He'll get to learn them as time goes on.

– marvinIsSacul
Nov 15 '18 at 9:42















@marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

– francesco
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47





@marvinIsSacul I think I have proposed both to "manually" use arrays and a self-defined swap, or to use the std library....

– francesco
Nov 15 '18 at 9:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315269%2fcreating-an-array-of-objects-inheriting-from-a-class-template-and-using-constr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Lugert, Oklahoma