Bypass post-receive hook git
Is there a way how to explicitly bypass firing the post-receive hook? Meaning after pushing commit the post-receive hook won't run.
git push githooks
add a comment |
Is there a way how to explicitly bypass firing the post-receive hook? Meaning after pushing commit the post-receive hook won't run.
git push githooks
add a comment |
Is there a way how to explicitly bypass firing the post-receive hook? Meaning after pushing commit the post-receive hook won't run.
git push githooks
Is there a way how to explicitly bypass firing the post-receive hook? Meaning after pushing commit the post-receive hook won't run.
git push githooks
git push githooks
edited Apr 2 '14 at 10:01
user3350906
asked Apr 2 '14 at 9:45
user3350906user3350906
11519
11519
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It doesn't seem to be possible with git alone on the receiving (server -side) end: you need to customize your hook in order to allow that case (skip) to occur.
This differ from local hooks, that you can skip (for some of them).
See for example hooks in "Skip processing of Git revisions in post-receive hook that have already been previously processed" (which is about partialy skipping some commits, but the idea is similar)
add a comment |
It is quite possible to skip post-receive
hook with use of push-options
.
To make is happen you need three ingredients:
1)
According to man githooks
, post-receive section:
The number of push options given on the command line of git push --push-option=... can be read from the environment variable GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT, and the options themselves are found in GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_1,... If it is negotiated to not use the push options phase, the environment variables will not be set. If the client selects to use push options, but doesn’t transmit any, the count variable will be set to zero, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=0.
So you can prepare your post-receive
hook script like this:
if [ "x${GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT}" = "x0" ] ; then
exec /usr/share/buildbot/contrib/git_buildbot.py --master=172.16.1.1:8989 --auth="***" --category=yaal --project=yaal --repository=yaal "${@}"
fi
2)
According to git-config-receiveadvertisePushOptions:
When set to true, git-receive-pack will advertise the push options capability to its clients. False by default.
So you need to add this configuration on your remote like so:
git config receive.advertisePushOptions true
Or edit your project.git/config manually.
3)
For pushes that you do not want for your post-receive hook to fire simply add dummy push option, like so:
git push -o blah
Using $GIT_PUSH_OPTION_(n)
you can make your pushes even more sophisticated.
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f22807520%2fbypass-post-receive-hook-git%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It doesn't seem to be possible with git alone on the receiving (server -side) end: you need to customize your hook in order to allow that case (skip) to occur.
This differ from local hooks, that you can skip (for some of them).
See for example hooks in "Skip processing of Git revisions in post-receive hook that have already been previously processed" (which is about partialy skipping some commits, but the idea is similar)
add a comment |
It doesn't seem to be possible with git alone on the receiving (server -side) end: you need to customize your hook in order to allow that case (skip) to occur.
This differ from local hooks, that you can skip (for some of them).
See for example hooks in "Skip processing of Git revisions in post-receive hook that have already been previously processed" (which is about partialy skipping some commits, but the idea is similar)
add a comment |
It doesn't seem to be possible with git alone on the receiving (server -side) end: you need to customize your hook in order to allow that case (skip) to occur.
This differ from local hooks, that you can skip (for some of them).
See for example hooks in "Skip processing of Git revisions in post-receive hook that have already been previously processed" (which is about partialy skipping some commits, but the idea is similar)
It doesn't seem to be possible with git alone on the receiving (server -side) end: you need to customize your hook in order to allow that case (skip) to occur.
This differ from local hooks, that you can skip (for some of them).
See for example hooks in "Skip processing of Git revisions in post-receive hook that have already been previously processed" (which is about partialy skipping some commits, but the idea is similar)
edited May 23 '17 at 10:31
Community♦
11
11
answered Apr 2 '14 at 11:15
VonCVonC
851k30127123273
851k30127123273
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is quite possible to skip post-receive
hook with use of push-options
.
To make is happen you need three ingredients:
1)
According to man githooks
, post-receive section:
The number of push options given on the command line of git push --push-option=... can be read from the environment variable GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT, and the options themselves are found in GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_1,... If it is negotiated to not use the push options phase, the environment variables will not be set. If the client selects to use push options, but doesn’t transmit any, the count variable will be set to zero, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=0.
So you can prepare your post-receive
hook script like this:
if [ "x${GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT}" = "x0" ] ; then
exec /usr/share/buildbot/contrib/git_buildbot.py --master=172.16.1.1:8989 --auth="***" --category=yaal --project=yaal --repository=yaal "${@}"
fi
2)
According to git-config-receiveadvertisePushOptions:
When set to true, git-receive-pack will advertise the push options capability to its clients. False by default.
So you need to add this configuration on your remote like so:
git config receive.advertisePushOptions true
Or edit your project.git/config manually.
3)
For pushes that you do not want for your post-receive hook to fire simply add dummy push option, like so:
git push -o blah
Using $GIT_PUSH_OPTION_(n)
you can make your pushes even more sophisticated.
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
add a comment |
It is quite possible to skip post-receive
hook with use of push-options
.
To make is happen you need three ingredients:
1)
According to man githooks
, post-receive section:
The number of push options given on the command line of git push --push-option=... can be read from the environment variable GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT, and the options themselves are found in GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_1,... If it is negotiated to not use the push options phase, the environment variables will not be set. If the client selects to use push options, but doesn’t transmit any, the count variable will be set to zero, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=0.
So you can prepare your post-receive
hook script like this:
if [ "x${GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT}" = "x0" ] ; then
exec /usr/share/buildbot/contrib/git_buildbot.py --master=172.16.1.1:8989 --auth="***" --category=yaal --project=yaal --repository=yaal "${@}"
fi
2)
According to git-config-receiveadvertisePushOptions:
When set to true, git-receive-pack will advertise the push options capability to its clients. False by default.
So you need to add this configuration on your remote like so:
git config receive.advertisePushOptions true
Or edit your project.git/config manually.
3)
For pushes that you do not want for your post-receive hook to fire simply add dummy push option, like so:
git push -o blah
Using $GIT_PUSH_OPTION_(n)
you can make your pushes even more sophisticated.
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
add a comment |
It is quite possible to skip post-receive
hook with use of push-options
.
To make is happen you need three ingredients:
1)
According to man githooks
, post-receive section:
The number of push options given on the command line of git push --push-option=... can be read from the environment variable GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT, and the options themselves are found in GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_1,... If it is negotiated to not use the push options phase, the environment variables will not be set. If the client selects to use push options, but doesn’t transmit any, the count variable will be set to zero, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=0.
So you can prepare your post-receive
hook script like this:
if [ "x${GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT}" = "x0" ] ; then
exec /usr/share/buildbot/contrib/git_buildbot.py --master=172.16.1.1:8989 --auth="***" --category=yaal --project=yaal --repository=yaal "${@}"
fi
2)
According to git-config-receiveadvertisePushOptions:
When set to true, git-receive-pack will advertise the push options capability to its clients. False by default.
So you need to add this configuration on your remote like so:
git config receive.advertisePushOptions true
Or edit your project.git/config manually.
3)
For pushes that you do not want for your post-receive hook to fire simply add dummy push option, like so:
git push -o blah
Using $GIT_PUSH_OPTION_(n)
you can make your pushes even more sophisticated.
It is quite possible to skip post-receive
hook with use of push-options
.
To make is happen you need three ingredients:
1)
According to man githooks
, post-receive section:
The number of push options given on the command line of git push --push-option=... can be read from the environment variable GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT, and the options themselves are found in GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_1,... If it is negotiated to not use the push options phase, the environment variables will not be set. If the client selects to use push options, but doesn’t transmit any, the count variable will be set to zero, GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=0.
So you can prepare your post-receive
hook script like this:
if [ "x${GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT}" = "x0" ] ; then
exec /usr/share/buildbot/contrib/git_buildbot.py --master=172.16.1.1:8989 --auth="***" --category=yaal --project=yaal --repository=yaal "${@}"
fi
2)
According to git-config-receiveadvertisePushOptions:
When set to true, git-receive-pack will advertise the push options capability to its clients. False by default.
So you need to add this configuration on your remote like so:
git config receive.advertisePushOptions true
Or edit your project.git/config manually.
3)
For pushes that you do not want for your post-receive hook to fire simply add dummy push option, like so:
git push -o blah
Using $GIT_PUSH_OPTION_(n)
you can make your pushes even more sophisticated.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 5:49
AmokHuginnssonAmokHuginnsson
1,01298
1,01298
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
add a comment |
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
1
1
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
Interesting. +1. This comes from github.com/git/git/commit/…, Git v2.10.0-rc0, July 2016, 2 years after my own answer. I mentioned it here: stackoverflow.com/a/38770670/6309
– VonC
Nov 16 '18 at 5:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f22807520%2fbypass-post-receive-hook-git%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown