A counter-example for the reversed direction of Casson-Gordon's theorem











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
3












For a knot $K$, let $Sigma_K$ be the double cyclic branched cover of a knot.



By the classical work of Casson and Gordon, we know that if $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_K$ bounds a rational homology ball.



Is there any well-known counter-example for the reversed direction?



EDIT More general statement is true due to the work of Casson & Gordon, just seen in ACP18.



For any prime $p$ and positive integer $r$, the $p^r$-fold cyclic branched cover of a knot $ K$, denoted by $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$, is a $mathbb Z_p$-homology sphere.



Theorem: If $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$ bounds $mathbb Z_p$-homology ball.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    3












    For a knot $K$, let $Sigma_K$ be the double cyclic branched cover of a knot.



    By the classical work of Casson and Gordon, we know that if $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_K$ bounds a rational homology ball.



    Is there any well-known counter-example for the reversed direction?



    EDIT More general statement is true due to the work of Casson & Gordon, just seen in ACP18.



    For any prime $p$ and positive integer $r$, the $p^r$-fold cyclic branched cover of a knot $ K$, denoted by $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$, is a $mathbb Z_p$-homology sphere.



    Theorem: If $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$ bounds $mathbb Z_p$-homology ball.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      3









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      3






      3





      For a knot $K$, let $Sigma_K$ be the double cyclic branched cover of a knot.



      By the classical work of Casson and Gordon, we know that if $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_K$ bounds a rational homology ball.



      Is there any well-known counter-example for the reversed direction?



      EDIT More general statement is true due to the work of Casson & Gordon, just seen in ACP18.



      For any prime $p$ and positive integer $r$, the $p^r$-fold cyclic branched cover of a knot $ K$, denoted by $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$, is a $mathbb Z_p$-homology sphere.



      Theorem: If $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$ bounds $mathbb Z_p$-homology ball.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      For a knot $K$, let $Sigma_K$ be the double cyclic branched cover of a knot.



      By the classical work of Casson and Gordon, we know that if $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_K$ bounds a rational homology ball.



      Is there any well-known counter-example for the reversed direction?



      EDIT More general statement is true due to the work of Casson & Gordon, just seen in ACP18.



      For any prime $p$ and positive integer $r$, the $p^r$-fold cyclic branched cover of a knot $ K$, denoted by $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$, is a $mathbb Z_p$-homology sphere.



      Theorem: If $K$ is smoothly slice, then $Sigma_{p^r}(K)$ bounds $mathbb Z_p$-homology ball.







      gt.geometric-topology






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 10 at 15:09





















      New contributor




      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 10 at 10:04









      ToposLogos

      1736




      1736




      New contributor




      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted










          Here's a particularly subtle counterexample, from the work of Kirk and Livingston (Topology Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 663--671, 1999). They show that the pretzel knots $J = P(-3,5,7,2)$ and $K = P(5,-3,7,2)$ are not concordant (even locally flat). These two knots are related by mutation (switch the first two pairs of twists in the standard picture of a pretzel knot). On the other hand, they have the same double branched cover, say $Sigma$, a certain Brieskorn sphere. (This is a general fact about mutations, but is clear in this setting.)



          Then the knot $J # -K$ is not slice, but its double branched cover $Sigma # -Sigma$ bounds an integer homology ball (in fact $(Sigma - text{int} B^3) times I$).



          There are many earlier examples in the literature for pairs of knots with the same double branched covers. Presumably it's not hard to check that for some of these, the knots are not concordant, using eg knot signatures. So one could construct many more examples. Likewise there are pairs of knots with the same n-fold branched covers (for a fixed $n$) and I'm sure you could construct counterexamples for those as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
            – ToposLogos
            Nov 10 at 16:56


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Probably, I found some more explicit examples:



          Akbulut and Larson recently showed in AL18 that family of Brieskorn spheres $Sigma(2,4n+1,12n+5)$ and $Sigma(3,3n+1,12n+5)$ bound rational homology ball.



          These Brieskorn spheres are respectively $2$- and $3$-fold cyclic branched cover of torus knots $T_{4n+1,12n+5}$ and $T_{3n+1,12n+5}$, which are not smoothly slice, for example due to Milnor slice genus proven by Kronheimer and Mrowka in KM93.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            ToposLogos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315004%2fa-counter-example-for-the-reversed-direction-of-casson-gordons-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            8
            down vote



            accepted










            Here's a particularly subtle counterexample, from the work of Kirk and Livingston (Topology Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 663--671, 1999). They show that the pretzel knots $J = P(-3,5,7,2)$ and $K = P(5,-3,7,2)$ are not concordant (even locally flat). These two knots are related by mutation (switch the first two pairs of twists in the standard picture of a pretzel knot). On the other hand, they have the same double branched cover, say $Sigma$, a certain Brieskorn sphere. (This is a general fact about mutations, but is clear in this setting.)



            Then the knot $J # -K$ is not slice, but its double branched cover $Sigma # -Sigma$ bounds an integer homology ball (in fact $(Sigma - text{int} B^3) times I$).



            There are many earlier examples in the literature for pairs of knots with the same double branched covers. Presumably it's not hard to check that for some of these, the knots are not concordant, using eg knot signatures. So one could construct many more examples. Likewise there are pairs of knots with the same n-fold branched covers (for a fixed $n$) and I'm sure you could construct counterexamples for those as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
              – ToposLogos
              Nov 10 at 16:56















            up vote
            8
            down vote



            accepted










            Here's a particularly subtle counterexample, from the work of Kirk and Livingston (Topology Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 663--671, 1999). They show that the pretzel knots $J = P(-3,5,7,2)$ and $K = P(5,-3,7,2)$ are not concordant (even locally flat). These two knots are related by mutation (switch the first two pairs of twists in the standard picture of a pretzel knot). On the other hand, they have the same double branched cover, say $Sigma$, a certain Brieskorn sphere. (This is a general fact about mutations, but is clear in this setting.)



            Then the knot $J # -K$ is not slice, but its double branched cover $Sigma # -Sigma$ bounds an integer homology ball (in fact $(Sigma - text{int} B^3) times I$).



            There are many earlier examples in the literature for pairs of knots with the same double branched covers. Presumably it's not hard to check that for some of these, the knots are not concordant, using eg knot signatures. So one could construct many more examples. Likewise there are pairs of knots with the same n-fold branched covers (for a fixed $n$) and I'm sure you could construct counterexamples for those as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
              – ToposLogos
              Nov 10 at 16:56













            up vote
            8
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            8
            down vote



            accepted






            Here's a particularly subtle counterexample, from the work of Kirk and Livingston (Topology Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 663--671, 1999). They show that the pretzel knots $J = P(-3,5,7,2)$ and $K = P(5,-3,7,2)$ are not concordant (even locally flat). These two knots are related by mutation (switch the first two pairs of twists in the standard picture of a pretzel knot). On the other hand, they have the same double branched cover, say $Sigma$, a certain Brieskorn sphere. (This is a general fact about mutations, but is clear in this setting.)



            Then the knot $J # -K$ is not slice, but its double branched cover $Sigma # -Sigma$ bounds an integer homology ball (in fact $(Sigma - text{int} B^3) times I$).



            There are many earlier examples in the literature for pairs of knots with the same double branched covers. Presumably it's not hard to check that for some of these, the knots are not concordant, using eg knot signatures. So one could construct many more examples. Likewise there are pairs of knots with the same n-fold branched covers (for a fixed $n$) and I'm sure you could construct counterexamples for those as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Here's a particularly subtle counterexample, from the work of Kirk and Livingston (Topology Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 663--671, 1999). They show that the pretzel knots $J = P(-3,5,7,2)$ and $K = P(5,-3,7,2)$ are not concordant (even locally flat). These two knots are related by mutation (switch the first two pairs of twists in the standard picture of a pretzel knot). On the other hand, they have the same double branched cover, say $Sigma$, a certain Brieskorn sphere. (This is a general fact about mutations, but is clear in this setting.)



            Then the knot $J # -K$ is not slice, but its double branched cover $Sigma # -Sigma$ bounds an integer homology ball (in fact $(Sigma - text{int} B^3) times I$).



            There are many earlier examples in the literature for pairs of knots with the same double branched covers. Presumably it's not hard to check that for some of these, the knots are not concordant, using eg knot signatures. So one could construct many more examples. Likewise there are pairs of knots with the same n-fold branched covers (for a fixed $n$) and I'm sure you could construct counterexamples for those as well.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 10 at 14:45









            Danny Ruberman

            10.6k3557




            10.6k3557












            • Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
              – ToposLogos
              Nov 10 at 16:56


















            • Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
              – ToposLogos
              Nov 10 at 16:56
















            Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
            – ToposLogos
            Nov 10 at 16:56




            Thanks a lot for your explanatory response, Professor Ruberman.
            – ToposLogos
            Nov 10 at 16:56










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Probably, I found some more explicit examples:



            Akbulut and Larson recently showed in AL18 that family of Brieskorn spheres $Sigma(2,4n+1,12n+5)$ and $Sigma(3,3n+1,12n+5)$ bound rational homology ball.



            These Brieskorn spheres are respectively $2$- and $3$-fold cyclic branched cover of torus knots $T_{4n+1,12n+5}$ and $T_{3n+1,12n+5}$, which are not smoothly slice, for example due to Milnor slice genus proven by Kronheimer and Mrowka in KM93.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Probably, I found some more explicit examples:



              Akbulut and Larson recently showed in AL18 that family of Brieskorn spheres $Sigma(2,4n+1,12n+5)$ and $Sigma(3,3n+1,12n+5)$ bound rational homology ball.



              These Brieskorn spheres are respectively $2$- and $3$-fold cyclic branched cover of torus knots $T_{4n+1,12n+5}$ and $T_{3n+1,12n+5}$, which are not smoothly slice, for example due to Milnor slice genus proven by Kronheimer and Mrowka in KM93.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              New contributor




              ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Probably, I found some more explicit examples:



                Akbulut and Larson recently showed in AL18 that family of Brieskorn spheres $Sigma(2,4n+1,12n+5)$ and $Sigma(3,3n+1,12n+5)$ bound rational homology ball.



                These Brieskorn spheres are respectively $2$- and $3$-fold cyclic branched cover of torus knots $T_{4n+1,12n+5}$ and $T_{3n+1,12n+5}$, which are not smoothly slice, for example due to Milnor slice genus proven by Kronheimer and Mrowka in KM93.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                Probably, I found some more explicit examples:



                Akbulut and Larson recently showed in AL18 that family of Brieskorn spheres $Sigma(2,4n+1,12n+5)$ and $Sigma(3,3n+1,12n+5)$ bound rational homology ball.



                These Brieskorn spheres are respectively $2$- and $3$-fold cyclic branched cover of torus knots $T_{4n+1,12n+5}$ and $T_{3n+1,12n+5}$, which are not smoothly slice, for example due to Milnor slice genus proven by Kronheimer and Mrowka in KM93.







                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 10 at 16:56





















                New contributor




                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered Nov 10 at 15:05









                ToposLogos

                1736




                1736




                New contributor




                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                ToposLogos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                    ToposLogos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    ToposLogos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    ToposLogos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    ToposLogos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315004%2fa-counter-example-for-the-reversed-direction-of-casson-gordons-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Florida Star v. B. J. F.

                    Danny Elfman

                    Retrieve a Users Dashboard in Tumblr with R and TumblR. Oauth Issues