UglifyJS throws unexpected token: keyword (const) with node_modules





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







28















A small project I started make use a node module (installed via npm) that declares const variables. Running and testing this project is well, but browserify fails when UglifyJS is executed.




Unexpected token: keyword (const)




Here is a generic Gulp file that I have successfully been using for a few other past projects without this issue (i.e. without that particular node module).



gulpfile.js



'use strict';

const browserify = require('browserify');
const gulp = require('gulp');
const source = require('vinyl-source-stream');
const derequire = require('gulp-derequire');
const buffer = require('vinyl-buffer');
const uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
const sourcemaps = require('gulp-sourcemaps');
const gutil = require('gulp-util');
const path = require('path');
const pkg = require('./package');
const upperCamelCase = require('uppercamelcase');

const SRC_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.main);
const DIST_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.browser);

const INPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.main);
const OUTPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.browser);

const MODULE_NAME = upperCamelCase(pkg.name);


gulp.task('default', () => {
// set up the browserify instance on a task basis
var b = browserify({
entries: INPUT_FILE,
basedir: SRC_PATH,
transform: ['babelify'],
standalone: MODULE_NAME,
debug: true
});

return b.bundle()
.pipe(source(OUTPUT_FILE))
.pipe(buffer())
.pipe(derequire())
.pipe(sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true}))
.pipe(uglify())
.on('error', gutil.log)
.pipe(sourcemaps.write('.'))
.pipe(gulp.dest(DIST_PATH))
;
});


I have tried fixing this by replace all const to var in that npm-installed module, and everything is fine. So I do not understand the failure.



What's wrong with const? Unless someone uses IE10, all major browsers support this syntax.



Is there a way to fix this without requiring a change to that node module?



Update



I have temporarily (or permanently) replaced UglifyJS with Butternut and seem to work.










share|improve this question

























  • Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:03











  • I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:05











  • Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:06











  • @this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:10











  • It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

    – James
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:15


















28















A small project I started make use a node module (installed via npm) that declares const variables. Running and testing this project is well, but browserify fails when UglifyJS is executed.




Unexpected token: keyword (const)




Here is a generic Gulp file that I have successfully been using for a few other past projects without this issue (i.e. without that particular node module).



gulpfile.js



'use strict';

const browserify = require('browserify');
const gulp = require('gulp');
const source = require('vinyl-source-stream');
const derequire = require('gulp-derequire');
const buffer = require('vinyl-buffer');
const uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
const sourcemaps = require('gulp-sourcemaps');
const gutil = require('gulp-util');
const path = require('path');
const pkg = require('./package');
const upperCamelCase = require('uppercamelcase');

const SRC_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.main);
const DIST_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.browser);

const INPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.main);
const OUTPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.browser);

const MODULE_NAME = upperCamelCase(pkg.name);


gulp.task('default', () => {
// set up the browserify instance on a task basis
var b = browserify({
entries: INPUT_FILE,
basedir: SRC_PATH,
transform: ['babelify'],
standalone: MODULE_NAME,
debug: true
});

return b.bundle()
.pipe(source(OUTPUT_FILE))
.pipe(buffer())
.pipe(derequire())
.pipe(sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true}))
.pipe(uglify())
.on('error', gutil.log)
.pipe(sourcemaps.write('.'))
.pipe(gulp.dest(DIST_PATH))
;
});


I have tried fixing this by replace all const to var in that npm-installed module, and everything is fine. So I do not understand the failure.



What's wrong with const? Unless someone uses IE10, all major browsers support this syntax.



Is there a way to fix this without requiring a change to that node module?



Update



I have temporarily (or permanently) replaced UglifyJS with Butternut and seem to work.










share|improve this question

























  • Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:03











  • I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:05











  • Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:06











  • @this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:10











  • It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

    – James
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:15














28












28








28


4






A small project I started make use a node module (installed via npm) that declares const variables. Running and testing this project is well, but browserify fails when UglifyJS is executed.




Unexpected token: keyword (const)




Here is a generic Gulp file that I have successfully been using for a few other past projects without this issue (i.e. without that particular node module).



gulpfile.js



'use strict';

const browserify = require('browserify');
const gulp = require('gulp');
const source = require('vinyl-source-stream');
const derequire = require('gulp-derequire');
const buffer = require('vinyl-buffer');
const uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
const sourcemaps = require('gulp-sourcemaps');
const gutil = require('gulp-util');
const path = require('path');
const pkg = require('./package');
const upperCamelCase = require('uppercamelcase');

const SRC_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.main);
const DIST_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.browser);

const INPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.main);
const OUTPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.browser);

const MODULE_NAME = upperCamelCase(pkg.name);


gulp.task('default', () => {
// set up the browserify instance on a task basis
var b = browserify({
entries: INPUT_FILE,
basedir: SRC_PATH,
transform: ['babelify'],
standalone: MODULE_NAME,
debug: true
});

return b.bundle()
.pipe(source(OUTPUT_FILE))
.pipe(buffer())
.pipe(derequire())
.pipe(sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true}))
.pipe(uglify())
.on('error', gutil.log)
.pipe(sourcemaps.write('.'))
.pipe(gulp.dest(DIST_PATH))
;
});


I have tried fixing this by replace all const to var in that npm-installed module, and everything is fine. So I do not understand the failure.



What's wrong with const? Unless someone uses IE10, all major browsers support this syntax.



Is there a way to fix this without requiring a change to that node module?



Update



I have temporarily (or permanently) replaced UglifyJS with Butternut and seem to work.










share|improve this question
















A small project I started make use a node module (installed via npm) that declares const variables. Running and testing this project is well, but browserify fails when UglifyJS is executed.




Unexpected token: keyword (const)




Here is a generic Gulp file that I have successfully been using for a few other past projects without this issue (i.e. without that particular node module).



gulpfile.js



'use strict';

const browserify = require('browserify');
const gulp = require('gulp');
const source = require('vinyl-source-stream');
const derequire = require('gulp-derequire');
const buffer = require('vinyl-buffer');
const uglify = require('gulp-uglify');
const sourcemaps = require('gulp-sourcemaps');
const gutil = require('gulp-util');
const path = require('path');
const pkg = require('./package');
const upperCamelCase = require('uppercamelcase');

const SRC_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.main);
const DIST_PATH = path.dirname(pkg.browser);

const INPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.main);
const OUTPUT_FILE = path.basename(pkg.browser);

const MODULE_NAME = upperCamelCase(pkg.name);


gulp.task('default', () => {
// set up the browserify instance on a task basis
var b = browserify({
entries: INPUT_FILE,
basedir: SRC_PATH,
transform: ['babelify'],
standalone: MODULE_NAME,
debug: true
});

return b.bundle()
.pipe(source(OUTPUT_FILE))
.pipe(buffer())
.pipe(derequire())
.pipe(sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true}))
.pipe(uglify())
.on('error', gutil.log)
.pipe(sourcemaps.write('.'))
.pipe(gulp.dest(DIST_PATH))
;
});


I have tried fixing this by replace all const to var in that npm-installed module, and everything is fine. So I do not understand the failure.



What's wrong with const? Unless someone uses IE10, all major browsers support this syntax.



Is there a way to fix this without requiring a change to that node module?



Update



I have temporarily (or permanently) replaced UglifyJS with Butternut and seem to work.







javascript npm gulp babeljs uglifyjs2






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 '17 at 16:50







Yanick Rochon

















asked Nov 22 '17 at 16:01









Yanick RochonYanick Rochon

34.8k2091160




34.8k2091160













  • Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:03











  • I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:05











  • Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:06











  • @this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:10











  • It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

    – James
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:15



















  • Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:03











  • I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:05











  • Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

    – laurent
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:06











  • @this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

    – Yanick Rochon
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:10











  • It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

    – James
    Nov 22 '17 at 16:15

















Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

– laurent
Nov 22 '17 at 16:03





Isn't it a problem with the node version? Don't you need like node 8+ to have const available? (not sure when it was actually introduced)

– laurent
Nov 22 '17 at 16:03













I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

– Yanick Rochon
Nov 22 '17 at 16:05





I have been using const since v4. And I am currently using 8.9.1 LTS.

– Yanick Rochon
Nov 22 '17 at 16:05













Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

– laurent
Nov 22 '17 at 16:06





Ok that's strange then. What's the error message you are seeing?

– laurent
Nov 22 '17 at 16:06













@this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

– Yanick Rochon
Nov 22 '17 at 16:10





@this.lau_ the same error message as in the title, but I added it in the question as well for clarity.

– Yanick Rochon
Nov 22 '17 at 16:10













It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

– James
Nov 22 '17 at 16:15





It doesn't necessarily have to be about the 'const'. It could be one of the modules that you're requiring.

– James
Nov 22 '17 at 16:15












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















24














November 2018 update :



Use terser-webpack-plugin for ES6 (webpack@5 will use this plugin for uglification)



npm install terser-webpack-plugin --save-dev


Then define in your plugins array



const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin')

new TerserPlugin({
parallel: true,
terserOptions: {
ecma: 6,
},
}),


Source






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

    – Rafa
    Nov 19 '18 at 16:48



















16














UglifyJS does not support es6. const is an es6 declaration, so it throws an error.



What is weird is that the package you use does not transpile its files to es5 to be used anywhere.



If you want to still use UglifyJS (to re-use the configuration for example) use the ES6+ compatible version, uglify-es. (Warning: uglify-es is now abandoned.)



And as Ser mentionned, you should now use terser-webpack-plugin.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

    – ChrisR
    Nov 22 '17 at 17:08



















0














Use uglify-es-webpack-plugin is better



    const UglifyEsPlugin = require('uglify-es-webpack-plugin')



module.exports = {
plugins: [
new UglifyEsPlugin({
compress:{
drop_console: true
}
}),
]
}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

    – ChrisR
    Jan 17 at 15:55



















0














I have replaced UglifyJS with YUI Compressor JS inside the GUI of PHPStorm.. It works now.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f47439067%2fuglifyjs-throws-unexpected-token-keyword-const-with-node-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24














    November 2018 update :



    Use terser-webpack-plugin for ES6 (webpack@5 will use this plugin for uglification)



    npm install terser-webpack-plugin --save-dev


    Then define in your plugins array



    const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin')

    new TerserPlugin({
    parallel: true,
    terserOptions: {
    ecma: 6,
    },
    }),


    Source






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

      – Rafa
      Nov 19 '18 at 16:48
















    24














    November 2018 update :



    Use terser-webpack-plugin for ES6 (webpack@5 will use this plugin for uglification)



    npm install terser-webpack-plugin --save-dev


    Then define in your plugins array



    const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin')

    new TerserPlugin({
    parallel: true,
    terserOptions: {
    ecma: 6,
    },
    }),


    Source






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

      – Rafa
      Nov 19 '18 at 16:48














    24












    24








    24







    November 2018 update :



    Use terser-webpack-plugin for ES6 (webpack@5 will use this plugin for uglification)



    npm install terser-webpack-plugin --save-dev


    Then define in your plugins array



    const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin')

    new TerserPlugin({
    parallel: true,
    terserOptions: {
    ecma: 6,
    },
    }),


    Source






    share|improve this answer















    November 2018 update :



    Use terser-webpack-plugin for ES6 (webpack@5 will use this plugin for uglification)



    npm install terser-webpack-plugin --save-dev


    Then define in your plugins array



    const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin')

    new TerserPlugin({
    parallel: true,
    terserOptions: {
    ecma: 6,
    },
    }),


    Source







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 20 '18 at 10:24

























    answered Nov 16 '18 at 10:32









    SerSer

    1,128923




    1,128923








    • 1





      Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

      – Rafa
      Nov 19 '18 at 16:48














    • 1





      Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

      – Rafa
      Nov 19 '18 at 16:48








    1




    1





    Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

    – Rafa
    Nov 19 '18 at 16:48





    Maybe you should suggest npm install --save-dev terser-webpack-plugin.

    – Rafa
    Nov 19 '18 at 16:48













    16














    UglifyJS does not support es6. const is an es6 declaration, so it throws an error.



    What is weird is that the package you use does not transpile its files to es5 to be used anywhere.



    If you want to still use UglifyJS (to re-use the configuration for example) use the ES6+ compatible version, uglify-es. (Warning: uglify-es is now abandoned.)



    And as Ser mentionned, you should now use terser-webpack-plugin.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

      – ChrisR
      Nov 22 '17 at 17:08
















    16














    UglifyJS does not support es6. const is an es6 declaration, so it throws an error.



    What is weird is that the package you use does not transpile its files to es5 to be used anywhere.



    If you want to still use UglifyJS (to re-use the configuration for example) use the ES6+ compatible version, uglify-es. (Warning: uglify-es is now abandoned.)



    And as Ser mentionned, you should now use terser-webpack-plugin.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

      – ChrisR
      Nov 22 '17 at 17:08














    16












    16








    16







    UglifyJS does not support es6. const is an es6 declaration, so it throws an error.



    What is weird is that the package you use does not transpile its files to es5 to be used anywhere.



    If you want to still use UglifyJS (to re-use the configuration for example) use the ES6+ compatible version, uglify-es. (Warning: uglify-es is now abandoned.)



    And as Ser mentionned, you should now use terser-webpack-plugin.






    share|improve this answer















    UglifyJS does not support es6. const is an es6 declaration, so it throws an error.



    What is weird is that the package you use does not transpile its files to es5 to be used anywhere.



    If you want to still use UglifyJS (to re-use the configuration for example) use the ES6+ compatible version, uglify-es. (Warning: uglify-es is now abandoned.)



    And as Ser mentionned, you should now use terser-webpack-plugin.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 19 '18 at 10:20

























    answered Nov 22 '17 at 17:05









    ChrisRChrisR

    2,2541517




    2,2541517








    • 2





      You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

      – ChrisR
      Nov 22 '17 at 17:08














    • 2





      You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

      – ChrisR
      Nov 22 '17 at 17:08








    2




    2





    You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

    – ChrisR
    Nov 22 '17 at 17:08





    You can also replace gulp-uglifyby gulp-uglify-es: npmjs.com/package/gulp-uglify-es

    – ChrisR
    Nov 22 '17 at 17:08











    0














    Use uglify-es-webpack-plugin is better



        const UglifyEsPlugin = require('uglify-es-webpack-plugin')



    module.exports = {
    plugins: [
    new UglifyEsPlugin({
    compress:{
    drop_console: true
    }
    }),
    ]
    }





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

      – ChrisR
      Jan 17 at 15:55
















    0














    Use uglify-es-webpack-plugin is better



        const UglifyEsPlugin = require('uglify-es-webpack-plugin')



    module.exports = {
    plugins: [
    new UglifyEsPlugin({
    compress:{
    drop_console: true
    }
    }),
    ]
    }





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

      – ChrisR
      Jan 17 at 15:55














    0












    0








    0







    Use uglify-es-webpack-plugin is better



        const UglifyEsPlugin = require('uglify-es-webpack-plugin')



    module.exports = {
    plugins: [
    new UglifyEsPlugin({
    compress:{
    drop_console: true
    }
    }),
    ]
    }





    share|improve this answer













    Use uglify-es-webpack-plugin is better



        const UglifyEsPlugin = require('uglify-es-webpack-plugin')



    module.exports = {
    plugins: [
    new UglifyEsPlugin({
    compress:{
    drop_console: true
    }
    }),
    ]
    }






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 14 at 17:37









    NEO ViSiONNEO ViSiON

    1




    1








    • 1





      This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

      – ChrisR
      Jan 17 at 15:55














    • 1





      This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

      – ChrisR
      Jan 17 at 15:55








    1




    1





    This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

    – ChrisR
    Jan 17 at 15:55





    This is an opinion, please elaborate on why it is better.

    – ChrisR
    Jan 17 at 15:55











    0














    I have replaced UglifyJS with YUI Compressor JS inside the GUI of PHPStorm.. It works now.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      I have replaced UglifyJS with YUI Compressor JS inside the GUI of PHPStorm.. It works now.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        I have replaced UglifyJS with YUI Compressor JS inside the GUI of PHPStorm.. It works now.






        share|improve this answer















        I have replaced UglifyJS with YUI Compressor JS inside the GUI of PHPStorm.. It works now.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 13 at 10:28









        Azik Abdullah

        6,6651264112




        6,6651264112










        answered Mar 13 at 10:09









        SjoerdSjoerd

        419




        419






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f47439067%2fuglifyjs-throws-unexpected-token-keyword-const-with-node-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Florida Star v. B. J. F.

            Danny Elfman

            Retrieve a Users Dashboard in Tumblr with R and TumblR. Oauth Issues