Subprocess STDOUT is not Live












0















After looking through pretty much all relevant articles and trying everything, I can't make this work, so many thanks in advance for taking a look.



I wrote the following code to activate second script from the first script:



proc = subprocess.Popen(['python', path_calculator + 
'calculator.py'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
for line in proc.stdout:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line)
sys.stdout.buffer.flush()
line = str(line)
line = line[2:]
line = line[:-3]


The point of this code is to get the live output of the 'calculator' in the first script, because other scripts are depending on that output.
The code does provide the correct output, but only when the 'calculator' finishes. It then outputs all data in one go. That's not sufficient. I need the output the moment it comes out of the 'calculator'.



Funny thing is that it actually works on my mac, but I can't get it to work on Windows.
** A few hours later now, I found out that it's not my Mac that it works on, but it's Pycharm (which I use on my mac) that it works on. If I run it in the terminal on my mac it doesn't work either.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question

























  • Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

    – Canh
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:38











  • Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

    – Koen
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:26











  • Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

    – Matt Messersmith
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:43
















0















After looking through pretty much all relevant articles and trying everything, I can't make this work, so many thanks in advance for taking a look.



I wrote the following code to activate second script from the first script:



proc = subprocess.Popen(['python', path_calculator + 
'calculator.py'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
for line in proc.stdout:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line)
sys.stdout.buffer.flush()
line = str(line)
line = line[2:]
line = line[:-3]


The point of this code is to get the live output of the 'calculator' in the first script, because other scripts are depending on that output.
The code does provide the correct output, but only when the 'calculator' finishes. It then outputs all data in one go. That's not sufficient. I need the output the moment it comes out of the 'calculator'.



Funny thing is that it actually works on my mac, but I can't get it to work on Windows.
** A few hours later now, I found out that it's not my Mac that it works on, but it's Pycharm (which I use on my mac) that it works on. If I run it in the terminal on my mac it doesn't work either.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question

























  • Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

    – Canh
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:38











  • Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

    – Koen
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:26











  • Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

    – Matt Messersmith
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:43














0












0








0








After looking through pretty much all relevant articles and trying everything, I can't make this work, so many thanks in advance for taking a look.



I wrote the following code to activate second script from the first script:



proc = subprocess.Popen(['python', path_calculator + 
'calculator.py'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
for line in proc.stdout:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line)
sys.stdout.buffer.flush()
line = str(line)
line = line[2:]
line = line[:-3]


The point of this code is to get the live output of the 'calculator' in the first script, because other scripts are depending on that output.
The code does provide the correct output, but only when the 'calculator' finishes. It then outputs all data in one go. That's not sufficient. I need the output the moment it comes out of the 'calculator'.



Funny thing is that it actually works on my mac, but I can't get it to work on Windows.
** A few hours later now, I found out that it's not my Mac that it works on, but it's Pycharm (which I use on my mac) that it works on. If I run it in the terminal on my mac it doesn't work either.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question
















After looking through pretty much all relevant articles and trying everything, I can't make this work, so many thanks in advance for taking a look.



I wrote the following code to activate second script from the first script:



proc = subprocess.Popen(['python', path_calculator + 
'calculator.py'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
for line in proc.stdout:
sys.stdout.buffer.write(line)
sys.stdout.buffer.flush()
line = str(line)
line = line[2:]
line = line[:-3]


The point of this code is to get the live output of the 'calculator' in the first script, because other scripts are depending on that output.
The code does provide the correct output, but only when the 'calculator' finishes. It then outputs all data in one go. That's not sufficient. I need the output the moment it comes out of the 'calculator'.



Funny thing is that it actually works on my mac, but I can't get it to work on Windows.
** A few hours later now, I found out that it's not my Mac that it works on, but it's Pycharm (which I use on my mac) that it works on. If I run it in the terminal on my mac it doesn't work either.



Any suggestions?







python-3.x subprocess stdout






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 21:35







Koen

















asked Nov 15 '18 at 16:29









KoenKoen

11




11













  • Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

    – Canh
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:38











  • Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

    – Koen
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:26











  • Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

    – Matt Messersmith
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:43



















  • Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

    – Canh
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:38











  • Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

    – Koen
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:26











  • Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

    – Matt Messersmith
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:43

















Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

– Canh
Nov 15 '18 at 16:38





Because u said it worked on mac but not Windows, I think you should change path_calculator + 'calculator.py' into os.path.join(path_calculator, 'calculator.py')

– Canh
Nov 15 '18 at 16:38













Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

– Koen
Nov 15 '18 at 17:26





Thanks for replying. After a day of programming, I was not so clear in explaining the problem. I edited the explanation. Hope that clears up!

– Koen
Nov 15 '18 at 17:26













Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

– Matt Messersmith
Nov 15 '18 at 21:43





Possible duplicate of Constantly print Subprocess output while process is running

– Matt Messersmith
Nov 15 '18 at 21:43












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323889%2fsubprocess-stdout-is-not-live%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323889%2fsubprocess-stdout-is-not-live%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Florida Star v. B. J. F.

Danny Elfman

Retrieve a Users Dashboard in Tumblr with R and TumblR. Oauth Issues