kendo DataSource method pushUpdate doesn't support field parsing
What I'm trying to say is that push methods are made for changing items without making them 'dirty' so them won't be synchronized since they are changed by somebody else, you are just receiving updates. But at the same time pushUpdate method uses kendo.data.Model.prototype.accept method which does not parse values before applying and originally looks like this:
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(data[field], field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
I'm wondering if it is correct to extend Model with your own accept method?
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
value = that._parse(field, value); //added
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(value, field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
Seems it works (at least date fields looks like date object instead of strings), but kendo is too large to take all details into account
javascript kendo-datasource
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
add a comment |
What I'm trying to say is that push methods are made for changing items without making them 'dirty' so them won't be synchronized since they are changed by somebody else, you are just receiving updates. But at the same time pushUpdate method uses kendo.data.Model.prototype.accept method which does not parse values before applying and originally looks like this:
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(data[field], field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
I'm wondering if it is correct to extend Model with your own accept method?
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
value = that._parse(field, value); //added
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(value, field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
Seems it works (at least date fields looks like date object instead of strings), but kendo is too large to take all details into account
javascript kendo-datasource
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
add a comment |
What I'm trying to say is that push methods are made for changing items without making them 'dirty' so them won't be synchronized since they are changed by somebody else, you are just receiving updates. But at the same time pushUpdate method uses kendo.data.Model.prototype.accept method which does not parse values before applying and originally looks like this:
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(data[field], field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
I'm wondering if it is correct to extend Model with your own accept method?
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
value = that._parse(field, value); //added
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(value, field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
Seems it works (at least date fields looks like date object instead of strings), but kendo is too large to take all details into account
javascript kendo-datasource
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
What I'm trying to say is that push methods are made for changing items without making them 'dirty' so them won't be synchronized since they are changed by somebody else, you are just receiving updates. But at the same time pushUpdate method uses kendo.data.Model.prototype.accept method which does not parse values before applying and originally looks like this:
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(data[field], field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
I'm wondering if it is correct to extend Model with your own accept method?
accept: function (data) {
var that = this, parent = function () {
return that;
}, field;
for (field in data) {
var value = data[field];
value = that._parse(field, value); //added
if (field.charAt(0) != '_') {
value = that.wrap(value, field, parent);
}
that._set(field, value);
}
if (that.idField) {
that.id = that.get(that.idField);
}
that.dirty = false;
}
Seems it works (at least date fields looks like date object instead of strings), but kendo is too large to take all details into account
javascript kendo-datasource
javascript kendo-datasource
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:59
Pavel K
17613
17613
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263736%2fkendo-datasource-method-pushupdate-doesnt-support-field-parsing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53263736%2fkendo-datasource-method-pushupdate-doesnt-support-field-parsing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
