CarrierwaveDirect version filename porting from CarrierWave fog











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So I've got 9000+ original images, each with 5-7 generated sizes, already stored on S3. Moving production to Heroku and one of the issues we have is timeout on large master images.



Started trying Carrierwave Direct gem to go straight to the S3 store and then process async, but ran into an issue with existing images disappearing as soon as I added the third include line to the base uploader:



class BaseUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
include CarrierWave::RMagick
include CarrierWave::ImageOptimizer
include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader

...
end


CarrierwaveDirect changes the filename format (here is the method: https://github.com/dwilkie/carrierwave_direct/blob/29caaa8d399968258299b57c84eac2e5e6fc4cf7/lib/carrierwave_direct/uploader.rb#L153)



The filenames are changed in this manner:



Orig carrierwave gen:
https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/full_003b_a1_back.png



CW Direct url gen:
https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/003b_a1_back_full.png



So the version name moves from the begining to the end of the uploaded filename. That actually makes sense, but I'm dealing with 2 years and 9k images :)



When I enable include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader in the BaseUploader it changes the manner in which urls are generated in the view, and therefore all images 404 (since they no longer exist)




  1. What is the best practice here? I'm saving to Fog, but since it's uploading to Heroku's /tmp, should I just move the processing to async?

  2. Can I revert the behavior by overriding that method or is that a no-go?

  3. Is there a way to easily rewrite the images filenames on S3 to the new format or is that a no-go?


Open to other solutions I'm not thinking about as well :)



The path is generated in base_uploader.rb:



def store_dir
"uploads/#{model.class.to_s.underscore}/#{mounted_as}/#{model.id}"
end


Rails 5.2.1, Ruby 2.5.2, Heroku-18 Standard 2x dyno (web) 1x dyno (worker). images.patchvault.org is the CNAME for a cloudfront CDN distro on the S3 bucket.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    So I've got 9000+ original images, each with 5-7 generated sizes, already stored on S3. Moving production to Heroku and one of the issues we have is timeout on large master images.



    Started trying Carrierwave Direct gem to go straight to the S3 store and then process async, but ran into an issue with existing images disappearing as soon as I added the third include line to the base uploader:



    class BaseUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
    include CarrierWave::RMagick
    include CarrierWave::ImageOptimizer
    include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader

    ...
    end


    CarrierwaveDirect changes the filename format (here is the method: https://github.com/dwilkie/carrierwave_direct/blob/29caaa8d399968258299b57c84eac2e5e6fc4cf7/lib/carrierwave_direct/uploader.rb#L153)



    The filenames are changed in this manner:



    Orig carrierwave gen:
    https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/full_003b_a1_back.png



    CW Direct url gen:
    https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/003b_a1_back_full.png



    So the version name moves from the begining to the end of the uploaded filename. That actually makes sense, but I'm dealing with 2 years and 9k images :)



    When I enable include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader in the BaseUploader it changes the manner in which urls are generated in the view, and therefore all images 404 (since they no longer exist)




    1. What is the best practice here? I'm saving to Fog, but since it's uploading to Heroku's /tmp, should I just move the processing to async?

    2. Can I revert the behavior by overriding that method or is that a no-go?

    3. Is there a way to easily rewrite the images filenames on S3 to the new format or is that a no-go?


    Open to other solutions I'm not thinking about as well :)



    The path is generated in base_uploader.rb:



    def store_dir
    "uploads/#{model.class.to_s.underscore}/#{mounted_as}/#{model.id}"
    end


    Rails 5.2.1, Ruby 2.5.2, Heroku-18 Standard 2x dyno (web) 1x dyno (worker). images.patchvault.org is the CNAME for a cloudfront CDN distro on the S3 bucket.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      So I've got 9000+ original images, each with 5-7 generated sizes, already stored on S3. Moving production to Heroku and one of the issues we have is timeout on large master images.



      Started trying Carrierwave Direct gem to go straight to the S3 store and then process async, but ran into an issue with existing images disappearing as soon as I added the third include line to the base uploader:



      class BaseUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
      include CarrierWave::RMagick
      include CarrierWave::ImageOptimizer
      include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader

      ...
      end


      CarrierwaveDirect changes the filename format (here is the method: https://github.com/dwilkie/carrierwave_direct/blob/29caaa8d399968258299b57c84eac2e5e6fc4cf7/lib/carrierwave_direct/uploader.rb#L153)



      The filenames are changed in this manner:



      Orig carrierwave gen:
      https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/full_003b_a1_back.png



      CW Direct url gen:
      https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/003b_a1_back_full.png



      So the version name moves from the begining to the end of the uploaded filename. That actually makes sense, but I'm dealing with 2 years and 9k images :)



      When I enable include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader in the BaseUploader it changes the manner in which urls are generated in the view, and therefore all images 404 (since they no longer exist)




      1. What is the best practice here? I'm saving to Fog, but since it's uploading to Heroku's /tmp, should I just move the processing to async?

      2. Can I revert the behavior by overriding that method or is that a no-go?

      3. Is there a way to easily rewrite the images filenames on S3 to the new format or is that a no-go?


      Open to other solutions I'm not thinking about as well :)



      The path is generated in base_uploader.rb:



      def store_dir
      "uploads/#{model.class.to_s.underscore}/#{mounted_as}/#{model.id}"
      end


      Rails 5.2.1, Ruby 2.5.2, Heroku-18 Standard 2x dyno (web) 1x dyno (worker). images.patchvault.org is the CNAME for a cloudfront CDN distro on the S3 bucket.










      share|improve this question















      So I've got 9000+ original images, each with 5-7 generated sizes, already stored on S3. Moving production to Heroku and one of the issues we have is timeout on large master images.



      Started trying Carrierwave Direct gem to go straight to the S3 store and then process async, but ran into an issue with existing images disappearing as soon as I added the third include line to the base uploader:



      class BaseUploader < CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
      include CarrierWave::RMagick
      include CarrierWave::ImageOptimizer
      include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader

      ...
      end


      CarrierwaveDirect changes the filename format (here is the method: https://github.com/dwilkie/carrierwave_direct/blob/29caaa8d399968258299b57c84eac2e5e6fc4cf7/lib/carrierwave_direct/uploader.rb#L153)



      The filenames are changed in this manner:



      Orig carrierwave gen:
      https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/full_003b_a1_back.png



      CW Direct url gen:
      https://images.patchvault.org/uploads/issue/imageback/629/003b_a1_back_full.png



      So the version name moves from the begining to the end of the uploaded filename. That actually makes sense, but I'm dealing with 2 years and 9k images :)



      When I enable include CarrierWaveDirect::Uploader in the BaseUploader it changes the manner in which urls are generated in the view, and therefore all images 404 (since they no longer exist)




      1. What is the best practice here? I'm saving to Fog, but since it's uploading to Heroku's /tmp, should I just move the processing to async?

      2. Can I revert the behavior by overriding that method or is that a no-go?

      3. Is there a way to easily rewrite the images filenames on S3 to the new format or is that a no-go?


      Open to other solutions I'm not thinking about as well :)



      The path is generated in base_uploader.rb:



      def store_dir
      "uploads/#{model.class.to_s.underscore}/#{mounted_as}/#{model.id}"
      end


      Rails 5.2.1, Ruby 2.5.2, Heroku-18 Standard 2x dyno (web) 1x dyno (worker). images.patchvault.org is the CNAME for a cloudfront CDN distro on the S3 bucket.







      ruby-on-rails amazon-s3 carrierwave carrierwave-direct






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago

























      asked Nov 10 at 13:40









      John Athayde

      311110




      311110





























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239549%2fcarrierwavedirect-version-filename-porting-from-carrierwave-fog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest





































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239549%2fcarrierwavedirect-version-filename-porting-from-carrierwave-fog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest




















































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Florida Star v. B. J. F.

          Error while running script in elastic search , gateway timeout

          Adding quotations to stringified JSON object values